Ne faites pas confiance au numéro +226 52632114 +226 545887 87 +226 75812496 qui se fait passer pour un vendeur de USDT, BTC et autres cryptomonnaies. Il s’agit d’une arnaque qui vous demande de lui envoyer de l’argent ou de lui communiquer vos identifiants de compte. Vous risquez de perdre vos fonds ou de vous faire voler vos données. Il a déjà fait plusieurs victime il utilise les Groupes WhatsApp et Telegram Part…

Channel
BTMM French Class
@btmmfrench
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,627subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001378013099 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @btmmfrench |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/btmmfrench |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 1,627 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 1,630 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 1,633 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 1,635 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 1,634 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 1,635 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:40 | 1,634 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 1,633 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
https://t.me/BTMMCred_Fx
LES 4 CONCEPTS EN 50 EMA BOUNCE TRADES AVEC TIMING
nous pouvons voir que l'entrée à 200 EMA rebond est également une chasse à la liquidité (LH) (lignes pointillées jaunes montrées)
nous pouvons voir que l'entrée à 200 EMA rebond est également une chasse à la liquidité (LH) (lignes pointillées jaunes montrées)
nous pouvons voir dans le commerce 200 EMA Bounce qu'il y avait aussi un bloc d'ordre (OB) (représenté par le rectangle bleu)
nous pouvons voir que l'entrée à 200 EMA rebond est également une chasse à la liquidité (LH) (lignes pointillées jaunes montrées)
nous pouvons voir que l'entrée à 200 EMA rebond est également une chasse à la liquidité (LH) (lignes pointillées jaunes montrées)
nous pouvons voir dans le commerce 200 EMA Bounce qu'il y avait aussi un Breaker Block (BB) (représenté par le rectangle bleu)
nous pouvons voir dans le commerce 200 EMA Bounce qu'il y avait aussi un bloc d'ordre (OB) (représenté par le rectangle bleu)
nous pouvons voir dans le commerce 200 EMA Bounce qu'il y avait aussi un bloc d'ordre (OB) (représenté par le rectangle bleu)
nous pouvons voir que le premier échange de 200 rebonds était également Liquidity Hunt (LH) (représenté par des lignes pointillées jaunes) et le deuxième échange de 200 rebonds était un retour de prix au bloc de commande (OB) (représenté par le rectangle bleu)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @btmmfrench. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 339,543 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BTMM French Class” (@btmmfrench), 1,627 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/btmmfrench.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.