Channel
@btcpulsecom
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry
8,046subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003928893631 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @btcpulsecom |
| Description | Bitcoin, Ethereum and digital asset news — clear market updates, crypto trends, price moves, regulation, ETFs and blockchain analysis |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/btcpulsecom |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
1.3 average views per post against 8,046 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.016%. Across the 8,336 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 3.55% and 20.0%, with a median of 9.27%.
| Window | 30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 55 of 55 published in the window (55 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 72 |
| Mature posts only | 0.017% over 47 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 8,046 measured 11 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:eng · 8,336 channels · p10 1.18% · p25 3.55% · p50 9.27% · p75 20.0% · p90 36.6% |
| Position in cohort | 0.084th percentile · 1/500 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | English · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 8,046 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 8,053 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:29 | 8,053 | first reading |
55 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 55 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 72 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
LMAX: Stablecoins and Tokenization Are Fixing Crypto’s Settlement Bottleneck LMAX Group’s Jenna Wright argues crypto markets break less from scarce capital than from liquidity stuck in slow settlement cycles, making stablecoins and tokenization critical infrastructure.
Russia Moves to Restrict Retail Crypto Trading to Bitcoin, Ether and USDT Russia's central bank will limit retail crypto trading to bitcoin, ether and USDT starting September 1, with a 300,000-ruble annual cap for non-qualified investors.
Metaplanet Moves 3,881 BTC Between Wallets as Bitcoin Holds $63,600 Metaplanet moved 3,881 Bitcoin worth approximately $247 million between its own wallets, confirming it wasn't a sale despite a $1.4 billion paper loss, as Bitcoin traded at $63,600.
CFTC Orders Kalshi to Continue Offering Prediction Markets in New York Despite State Lawsuit The CFTC has directed Kalshi to maintain its prediction market operations in New York, overriding a state lawsuit that sought to block sports-related event contracts.
The9 Investee Nanyang Biologics Moves Toward Nasdaq Listing with $1.5 Billion Valuation The9's Singapore-based investee Nanyang Biologics secures SEC clearance for its Nasdaq listing plans, with The9 set to hold a 15–16% stake in the combined $1.5 billion company.
Bitcoin Stuck in Narrow Range as ETF Inflows Offset Selling—CPI Data Could Spark a Move Bitcoin remains trapped between $62,000 and $66,000 as steady ETF buying is offset by miner selling; Wednesday’s CPI report may provide the catalyst for a breakout.
Live Updates: Bitcoin Falls to $63,500; CoreWeave Surges 9% as AI Backlog Tops $100B Bitcoin retreats to $63,500 as AI enthusiasm sends CoreWeave 9% higher, with its backlog topping $100 billion, while markets await a crucial U.S. inflation report.
Three Democratic Women Could Shape Crypto's Future if Congress Flips in 2027 If crypto legislation returns to Congress next session, Democratic Representatives Maxine Waters and Shontel Brown are poised to chair key committees with a skeptical view of digital assets.
Bitcoin-Backed Lending Enters Its Institutional Era Two Prime is facilitating institutional loans backed by bitcoin, allowing public companies to fund acquisitions and capital expenditures, marking a new phase for crypto-collateralized lending.
Coinbase Picks Abu Dhabi for Global Tokenized Asset Push After Securing Regulatory Approval Coinbase has received regulatory approval to offer tokenized securities from Abu Dhabi, marking a significant step in the exchange's global expansion into real-world asset tokenization.
SEC Sets Meeting to Propose ‘Reg Crypto’ to Support Digital Asset Offerings The SEC is set to vote on proposing a new “Reg Crypto” framework aimed at clarifying rules for digital asset offerings, signaling a pivotal shift toward regulatory certainty.
BTCPay Server Offers $190K Bounty After Lightning Node Exploit Drains Bitcoin Payments BTCPay Server is offering a bounty of up to 3 BTC (roughly $190,000) for information leading to the return of stolen bitcoin after a vulnerability allowed attackers to drain merchant Lightning wallets.
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @btcpulsecom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BTC-Pulse” (@btcpulsecom), 8,046 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/btcpulsecom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.