Channel
@btcmtofficial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,171subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001219945078 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @btcmtofficial |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/btcmtofficial |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 2,171 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:11 | 2,176 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 2,181 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 2,181 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 31 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (31 March 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 216 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
50 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5316740771632659023 | 16 | 32.0% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 30.0% | |
| custom 5314534799120025205 | 7 | 14.0% | |
| custom 5314271736668112233 | 3 | 6.00% | |
| custom 5316525546526489434 | 3 | 6.00% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 6.00% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 4.00% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.00% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @btcmtofficial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 March 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The most overlooked asset in the Bitcoin ecosystem isn't Bitcoin. It's hashrate. Hashrate represents real-world investment. Every increase means someone purchased new ASICs, secured energy contracts, built infrastructure and committed capital for years. You can't fake hashrate. It's one of the purest indicators of long-term confidence in Bitcoin. That's why professional investors don't just watch price. They w…
When people think about Bitcoin, they usually picture charts, wallets or price movements. What they rarely picture is the infrastructure behind it. Massive mining facilities. Specialized ASIC hardware. Power management. Cooling systems. Engineers keeping operations running around the clock. Bitcoin isn’t only a digital asset. It’s also one of the largest industrial networks built around a decentralized protocol. …
Minto Monthly Report | June June was another month of steady progress for Minto and another important chapter for the Bitcoin mining industry. While the market remained volatile, Bitcoin continued to do what it has always done -producing a new block approximately every 10 minutes, secured by one of the world's most powerful decentralized computing networks. Here's what shaped the industry this month. Bitcoin Mini…
Think about real estate. Some people buy apartments because they expect prices to rise. Others invest in income-generating properties because they value cash flow and long-term infrastructure. Bitcoin creates a similar choice. Owning BTC gives you direct exposure to the asset. Owning mining exposure means participating in the infrastructure that powers the network itself. Different strategies, different risk pr…
Traditional markets have opening bells, holidays and trading hours. Bitcoin has none of that. It doesn’t pause on weekends. It doesn’t close for public holidays. It doesn’t wait for central banks. Roughly every ten minutes, another block is added to the chain, no matter what’s happening in the world. Behind that consistency is a global network of miners working 24/7 to secure the protocol. It’s one of the few fi…
Minto Monthly Report | May May was another productive month for Minto and an important one for the Bitcoin mining industry as a whole. While markets continued to react to macroeconomic uncertainty and shifting investor sentiment, one thing remained constant: the Bitcoin network kept producing a new block roughly every 10 minutes, secured by one of the world's largest decentralized computing infrastructures. Bitcoi…
When people compare Bitcoin to gold, they usually stop at one idea: both are scarce assets. But there’s another comparison that often gets overlooked. With gold, investors have always had two choices: - own the metal itself; - own the companies that mine it. Bitcoin follows a surprisingly similar pattern. You can hold BTC as a long-term store of value, or you can gain exposure to the infrastructure that secures …
🌚 Our April report is live. Take a look 📝
custom 53145347991200252053custom 53167407716326590232❤1
🍕 On May 22, 2010, Laszlo Hanyecz became the first person to spend Bitcoin when it still meant almost nothing. The first Bitcoin transaction. The first person who simply believed in the idea behind it. Happy Bitcoin Pizza Day🎊
custom 53165255465264894343custom 53167407716326590233custom 53145347991200252052
💚 Minto’s hashrate reached 600 PH/s 🚀 At the same time, we maintained AEE at 24 W/TH and CEE at 21.5 W/TH. Reaching the 600,000 TH/s milestone confirms the effectiveness of the strategy supported by the community through VOTE#13 and earlier governance votes. 📈The growth of our computing power accelerates the expansion of Minto’s Bitcoin reserve, which in turn allows us to allocate even more capital toward purchasing…
custom 53167407716326590232custom 53145347991200252051
This is what you look like when you mine Bitcoin 😸
😁3❤2custom 53167407716326590232custom 53142717366681122331
📈May 2026 confirms the trend. The market is increasingly concentrating around Bitcoin. Strong strategies in this cycle are no longer built around trying to guess the “next coin,” but around the assets connected to Bitcoin itself and the efficiency of its production. 🌟That’s why long-term players: — hold BTC as a core strategic asset; — build exposure to hashrate; — focus on long-term efficiency rather than hype. …
custom 53167407716326590233👍1custom 53145347991200252051
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @btcmtofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 461,962 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Minto” (@btcmtofficial), 2,171 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/btcmtofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.