Channel
@btchaoge
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
104subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001841867668 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @btchaoge |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 15 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/btchaoge |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 104 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 105 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 105 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 60.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2023 to 7 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
https://t.me/BitgetYaoSir
昨日以太多單獲利，BTC多未進場。
多空比 BTC多234746空323440 ETH多223448空145748 持倉資金 529M 大餅重空頭情緒，以太重多頭情緒，很少見的情緒十分不一致，現在想想大餅的30625還是十分離譜的一件事，在我的認知里，只有以太坊的波動極高於大餅，很少有大餅的波動高於以太。原因還是深熊場內資金實在太少了，莊家簡直是可以胡作非為，盯住一個超級大戶就可以亂搞。牛市的時候莊家是沒有能力短時間去來回30%去操盤大餅的。A股也拉的稀碎。短期內還是會震蕩吧，看大餅的情緒可能還會上去再打一次壓力位，然後以太的反應大概率還是半死不活，然後在一起下來，至於大方向上還是下，純粹就看是大餅帶以太，還是以太帶大餅的行為了。 還是那個觀點，牛市在12月來，還有一個半月的時間，兄弟們，這一個半月不管狗莊怎麼洗，怎麼離譜，都請你一定要頂住，堅持下來就是發財的牛市，現在的市場行為明顯是去槓桿，勸退高倍的行為，市場會獎勵堅定的信仰者，但不是現在。 點位 下方…
大家早上好 週末波動比較小，但兩天都有獲利。 短期內多空的力量相對還是比較均衡。 今日先觀望有機會再給策略
👍1
ETH主力首次護盤，中綫拿空暫不接多
昨晚公佈了美國的CPI數據，本以為會借助數據下跌一波，但沒想到行情比預期的要弱，日內震蕩在26900-26550區間內，多空的力量都比較均衡，臨近週末盤面短期內將維持震蕩。上方阻力27000-27500，下方支撐2650-26000; 以太方面，在觸及1520附近後快速反抽至1550附近，目前報於1540附近。我們多單也有獲利一波，空單等待進場; 日內關注： BTC：27000-27500壓力，支撐26500-26000 ETH：1550-1580壓力，支撐1500-1460
👍1
BTC 方向: 空 進場：26800-26950 止盈: 26550-26600 止損：27150-27200 （思路僅供參考）
BTC今日分析 昨日形成小幅度的反彈之後受阻回落，能看得出價格是明顯的回抽後繼續下跌，並且是跌破27000才出現的下跌說明現在該通道已經被確認有效跌破，所以大概率這一輪的反彈行情已經結束，後續的走勢價格可能會不斷的降低，形成新的空頭趨勢。 今日關注： 壓力位：27200-27700 支撑位：26300-25800
品種：unfi 方向：空 點位：7.58-7.81 止盈：7.0-6.7 止損：7.90
🚀市場瘋幣盤點：ssv 短時支撐📈 13-13.3 短時極強支撐 📈 11.5-11.8 短時強壓力📉14.8-15.1
Tom老師直播公開教學課 主題：未來3年市場格局與資產佈局 時間：10月11日19:00-20:00 地址： Coinget
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @btchaoge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“比特幣豪哥” (@btchaoge), 104 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/btchaoge.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.