Channel
@btcchina
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,676subscribers
-62 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002041526192 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @btcchina |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/btcchina |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 3,676 | -55 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 3,731 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 3,738 | first reading |
71 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 71 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 71 (7 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 312 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
摩根大通：美欧企业盈利超预期，Q2财报季表现强劲 比特币中国消息，8 月 8 日，摩根大通表示，第二季度财报季已进入尾声，目前美国和欧洲约 80%-85% 的企业已公布业绩，整体盈利表现明显强于预期。 数据显示，美国和欧洲均出现大规模 EPS（每股收益）超预期情况，超过市场预期的企业比例较此前显著提升。尽管企业进入财报季前市场估值和盈利预期已处于较高水平，但标普 500 指数成分股综合 EPS 仍持续上调，盈利展望下调企业比例已降至 2021 年以来最低水平。 从地区来看，美国和欧洲企业盈利同比增速分别达到 25% 和 23%，均超过市场一致预期；收入同比增长分别达到 14% 和 10%，显示企业营收增长依然稳健。 行业方面，摩根大通指出，能源行业是推动两大地区盈利增长的重要因素之一，主要受地缘冲突推动能源价格上涨影响。此外，金融行业以及科技行业也对整体盈利增长贡献显著。 ✔比特币中国 @btcchina 讯息。
⚡️本周美国现货比特币ETF净流入8.653亿美元，比特币同期上涨3.18% 比特币中国消息，8 月 8 日，据 Farside 监测，本周美国现货比特币 ETF 净流入 8.653 亿美元，连续五个交易日强劲流入。比特币同期上涨 3.18%，加密市场整体回暖。 ✔比特币中国 @btcchina 讯息。
⚡️X平台推出原创内容奖励计划，9月起取代原收入分成机制 比特币中国消息，8 月 8 日，X（原 Twitter）宣布推出「原创内容奖励计划」，旨在奖励能够提供原创观点、专业分析、新闻报道、创意内容及评论的创作者。 X 表示，自即日起将停止接受新的收入分成计划（Revenue Sharing）申请。现有收入分成用户可继续获得收益至 2026 年 9 月 7 日，并将在 8 月 14 日、8 月 28 日以及 9 月 11 日前后收到最后三次付款。 从 9 月 8 日起，符合条件的现有创作者可申请加入新的原创内容奖励计划。新计划将根据原创内容产生的「有效曝光」（来自 X Premium 用户首页信息流、帖子至少 50% 可见）进行收益分配，首笔新计划付款预计于 8 月 28 日发放。 申请资格包括：年满 18 岁、账号状态良好、订阅 X Premium 或 Premium+、拥有至少 500 名认证粉丝，以及过去 90 天…
摩根大通：强劲财报未能推动美股上涨，市场更关注资本开支与预期压力 比特币中国消息，8 月 8 日，摩根大通表示，尽管美股企业盈利季整体表现强劲，但股价对业绩超预期的反应仍相对疲软，甚至部分科技公司在公布亮眼财报后出现股价下跌。 摩根大通认为，这一现象主要由多重因素共同推动，包括市场此前对企业盈利已经形成较高预期，投资者在科技行业持仓过于集中，以及市场关注重点逐渐从短期业绩转向企业未来资本开支计划。 尤其是在科技板块，投资者正在重新评估企业在 AI 基础设施等领域的大规模投入能否带来长期回报，单纯的盈利超预期已不足以支撑股价进一步上涨。 ✔比特币中国 @btcchina 讯息。
⚡️XRP Ledger拟推出隐私转账功能，瞄准超5.3亿美元机构级代币化资产市场 比特币中国消息，8 月 8 日，XRP Ledger（XRPL）最新软件版本 3.3.0 引入多项升级提案，其中「Confidential Transfers（机密转账）」功能旨在为机构用户提供更高隐私保护，支持对代币余额和转账金额进行加密，同时保留账户及代币类型可见性。 该功能主要面向 XRPL 上的多用途代币（Multi-Purpose Tokens，MPT），目标应用场景包括基金、债券等代币化金融资产。通过零知识证明等加密技术，网络可验证交易有效性，但无需公开具体金额。 据 CoinDesk 报道，XRPL 目前已有约 13.8 亿美元链上现实世界资产（RWA），其中包括约 8.457 亿美元 RLUSD。除 RLUSD 外，XRPL 上还有超过 5.3 亿美元的代币化资产，涉及 Ondo、VERT Capital、Archax 及法…
🔍 链上侦探 | 40倍做空比特币巨鲸现已浮亏超71万美元，爆仓价65,306美元 比特币中国消息，8 月 8 日，据 TradingBeats（原 Hyperinsight）监测，某巨鲸以 64,213 美元入场价，40 倍做空 930 枚比特币，现已浮亏 71.09 万美元，最新爆仓价 65,306 美元。 ✔比特币中国 @btcchina 讯息。
Serenity：白宫加码关键矿产投资是重要政策转向，仍需扩大资金规模 比特币中国消息，8 月 8 日，Serenity 发文表示，白宫终于开始加大对关键矿产和材料领域的投资力度，这是一个「令人惊喜」的政策动作，有助于推动美国关键供应链建设。 在上市公司方面，FEAM 获得 800 万美元资金支持，主要用于硼材料开发；HREE 获得 480 万美元资金支持，聚焦磁性稀土材料。此外，美国政府还向私营企业投入资金，包括向 Niron Magnetics 投资 1.5 亿美元，以及向 Standard Bauxite 投资 8500 万美元。 Serenity 认为，对于美国政府而言，这些资金规模只是「零花钱」，但却能够撬动大量下游产业应用，对降低关键材料供应链风险具有重要意义。 不过，他表示，目前的投入规模仍不足以完全解决供应链问题，未来需要进一步增加资金支持，加速关键矿产项目落地并降低产业链发展风险。 Serenity …
分析：韩国PCB厂商Q2业绩爆发，AI服务器与SOCAMM将成为下一轮增长引擎 比特币中国消息，8 月 8 日，Citrini 分析师 Jukan 表示，韩国 PCB/封装基板厂商有望延续 Q2 强劲表现，Q3 盈利预期进一步改善。 以大德电子为例，公司 Q2 营收达到 4,010 亿韩元，同比增长 63%；营业利润 703 亿韩元，同比暴增 3,599%。Simmtech 同期营收 5,146 亿韩元，同比增长 51%；营业利润 629 亿韩元，同比增长 1,035%。TLB 营收 882 亿韩元，同比增长 38%；营业利润 128 亿韩元，同比增长 86%。 Jukan 指出，大德电子的核心优势在于 AI 数据中心所需的 FC-BGA、FC-CSP 半导体封装基板以及多层 PCB（MLB）；Simmtech 则聚焦封装基板和存储模块 PCB；TLB 主要供应服务器 DDR5 及企业级 SSD 相关 PCB 产品。 他…
⚡️本周热点回顾：非农爆冷、美联储加息预期降温，霍尔木兹重启框架，AI产业迎估值考验 比特币中国消息，8 月 8 日，本周全球市场迎来多重重磅事件。美国 7 月非农就业人数意外减少 2.3 万人，远低于市场预期增加 8 万人，且 5 月、6 月就业数据合计下修 10.3 万人，推动市场大幅降低美联储加息预期，9 月加息概率由约 58% 降至 44%。美元指数连续第二周下跌，黄金受避险及降息预期推动周涨超 7%，白银涨超 10%，美股三大指数本周均上涨。 中东局势方面，据报道伊朗与阿曼已就霍尔木兹海峡重新开放达成临时框架，协议预计持续 60 天，但仍需伊朗批准，美伊双方对海峡控制权仍存分歧。能源市场经历剧烈波动，油价先因局势缓和预期下跌，随后因供应风险反弹。 市场热点方面，宇树科技科创板 IPO 定价 150.8 元/股，对应发行市值约 610 亿元，网下申购倍数达到 2618 倍；SpaceX 上市后首份财报显示二季度营收…
🔍 链上侦探 | 某巨鲸从 Coinbase Prime 提出3万枚 ETH，价值约5721万美元 比特币中国消息，8 月 8 日，据 Onchain Lens 监测，一名巨鲸从 Coinbase Prime 提出 30,000 枚 ETH，价值约 5721 万美元。 数据显示，该巨鲸随后将资金分散至 3 个新创建的钱包地址，分别为： 0x53242ee9951DA20d5C6CF587D9753042249E23D4、 0x7A71F135F23F4a84b7658788541F6a22a75644e6、 0x40187986A4228e2dd1f3E319d5716d81250528a5。 ✔比特币中国 @btcchina 讯息。
⚡️昨日美国现货以太坊ETF净流入4960万美元，连续四个交易日流入 比特币中国消息，8 月 8 日，据 Farside 监测，昨日美国现货以太坊 ETF 净流入 4960 万美元，已连续四个交易日实现净流入。 ✔比特币中国 @btcchina 讯息。
⚡️华尔街锐评非农：这份报告「极其可怕」！ 比特币中国消息，8 月 8 日，就在市场严阵以待美联储后续政策路径之际，昨日公布的美国 7 月非农就业报告犹如一记重锤，打破了此前经济强劲增长的幻象。数据显示，7 月美国经济不仅未能实现预期中的 8 万个职位增长，反而大幅缩减了 2.3 万个工作岗位。这一令人大跌眼镜的数字，配合 5 月和 6 月共计 10.3 万人的下修缺口，瞬间点燃了华尔街对劳动力市场转冷的担忧。 分析人士对这份「糟糕」报告的解读存在分歧。凯投宏观高级经济学家托马斯·瑞安（Thomas Ryan）直言，尽管目前的疲软尚未在更广泛的指标中体现，但足以让美联储官员重新审视劳动力市场的健康状况，并降低其在短期内进一步紧缩货币政策的意愿。 ClearBridge Investments 经济与市场策略主管杰夫·舒尔茨（Jeff Schulze）同样认为，这种季节性波动通常会在秋季逆转，底层的就业创造力其实依然维持着微…
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @btcchina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 823,734 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@btcchina named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“比特币中国” (@btcchina), 3,676 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/btcchina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.