Channel
@bshook6
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,679subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003943623387 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bshook6 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bshook6 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 2,679 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:11 | 2,685 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 2,687 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,357 |
| Reactions total | 41 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
41 reactions across 14 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 41 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
◻️欧易钱包 马年福利季已达到！ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 豪礼相送！⚡️ 🤥 欧易空投钱包【疯狂送钱中】 发送了一个空投红包🤑 🪙总金额: 35000 USDT💰 剩余:1762/1888 🥇 533.52(10:22:29) 💰 - 无畏无 🥈 433.10(10:22:31) 💰 - SoujiT... 🥉 421.34(10:22:32) 💰 - 顾北 ✨ 350.54(10:23:13) 💰 - AKS ✨ 331.49(10:23:27) 💰 - 四季（好大哥... ✨ 325.27(10:23:05) 💰 - 小泽 ⭐️ 297.25(10:23:15) 💰 - （阿骏）地址... ⭐️ 284.25(10:23:26) 💰 - 阿成 ⭐️ 274.96(10:23:25) 💰 - 伊总💋
Signed 辛巴
小宇最新频道 https://t.me/xynbNBx
👍1
Signed 冰释 源头查档/ 封禁
❗️❗️soso搜索资源群 🥰 🥰🥰🥰 ✅频道主推荐 TG最全soso资源搜索群🔍 🥰加入即可搜索🥰 https://t.me/+H90cuCmBz38zMjEx https://t.me/+V_GTlzQIjVY4NDhk https://t.me/+y9aA26qr19c0YWRh 免费开户 千元红包 免费数据号 公益内核 破解美化 免费看篇 八卦吃瓜 抖音热搜…… 点击下方按钮加入🌐
👍1
Signed 辛巴
有什么正式注入带追踪的？ 发一下频道
👍3
Signed 冰释 源头查档
📱📱抖音代发视频👏👏 🟢视频素材，稳定结账🟢 🟢视频素材，稳定结账🟢 📱📱一个视频 📱📱单以上📱📱 📱📱单以上📱📱 75-80收抖音固定团 📱做单认准：@qizhawwg 双向进交流群@我 https://t.me/+uZnIcQQuokQ3NTAx 主频道 https://t.me/dyfashiping 支持 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
空空你这个傻子掉了，能不能就别七⑧叫了
👍2
Signed 冰冰
3年老项目无需做多的介绍
👍5
Signed 冰封
居然还在做加速
👍4
Signed 冰释 源头查档
冰封国体内置福利永久卡已上架仅需5元 https://918.oioix.cn/links/82FD7C96 优先购买使用最低价格体验 4.6.3开始更新国体先抢先得数量有限
👍3
Signed 冰封
没完全打死
👍3
Signed 冰冰
要打就得打死
👍5
Signed 冰释 源头查档/ 封禁
我是说裸奔不配防🤓
👍1
Signed 冰冰
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bshook6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
里面是放追踪还是自瞄
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
想要啥
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 506,198 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“冰释加速范围” (@bshook6), 2,679 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bshook6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.