Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 64 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 218–227 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Oct 2026, 21:59
219
-2
1 Oct 2026, 15:20
221
-1
16 Sept 2026, 17:40
222
-1
9 Sept 2026, 12:17
223
-1
31 Aug 2026, 07:13
224
-2
24 Aug 2026, 07:04
226
+1
8 Aug 2026, 10:20
225
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:50
225
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
50s
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
203 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
75
36.9%
🔥
75
36.9%
👍
49
24.1%
🙏
4
1.97%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А зачем им вообще эта оптимизация?
Честно? Этот вопрос мы слышим постоянно. Как от собственников, так и от тех, кто наблюдает со стороны. И мы всегда отвечаем на него одинаково.
Оптимизация - это не про то, чтобы сократить бюджет и не про то, чтобы «урезать» команду. Оптимизация - это про то, чтобы перестать терять деньги там, где вы их даже не замечаете.
Представьте, что бизнес - это большая труба. Вода течёт, вс…
Продукт, который меняет бизнес изнутри
«Архитектор систем» — это не консалтинг. Это не обучение. Это трансформация
Когда собственник бизнеса приходит ко мне, он чаще всего говорит примерно так:
«У нас всё есть, но всё работает через раз. Я устал контролировать. Где дыра?»
И я знаю ответ. Потому что за 80 проектов в разных бизнесах я видела эту дыру 80 раз.
«Архитектор систем» — это моя индивидуальная авторская про…
Выдуманная боль рынка - убийца стартапов. И как её проверить
Сегодня была на закрытой встрече Unicorn Lab Оскара Хартманна. Там прозвучал вопрос: «Какая самая главная проблема у стартапов?»
И ответ ментора Вячеслава Озерова был таким точным:
«Выдуманная боль рынка. 90% стартапов не взлетают, потому что они придумали проблему, которой у клиента нет»
И сейчас, в эпоху ИИ, эта проблема стала ещё острее. Многие действ…
Спойлер: а вы знали, сколько компаний в регионе с выручкой более 1 млрд. руб., а сколько с выручкой более 50 млн.руб.? В исследовании я анализирую вообще рынок Краснодарского края, консалтинг это был лишь повод. Но получилось более 20 страниц 😱
Я подготовила исследование консалтингового рынка. Интересно вам будет прочитать, если выложу здесь?
Да57%
Конечно да71%
Нет0%
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @bsdoc24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Я подготовила исследование консалтингового рынка. Интересно вам будет прочитать, если выложу здесь?
Да57%
Конечно да71%
Нет0%
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Стратегический актив” (@bsdoc24), 219 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bsdoc24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.