Channel
@bsd_1_2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002389411279 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bsd_1_2 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bsd_1_2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 4 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 4 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 5 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
14 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 35.7% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 35.7% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 14.3% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2025 to 17 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠*️⃣ 💮🔤 🔠🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🔠🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌸💋 С светлым праздником вас, Осаму Дазай! Очень сильно извиняюсь если опоздал (( От лица администрации желаем вам всего самого наилучшего. Чтобы дни были именно такими какие должны быть на ваш взгляд! Главное будьте здоровы и находитесь только там где чувствуете себя супер! Бесконечное спасибо за то что вы с нами, надеямся что это не последнее ваше день рождение с wine clud. 🤍🤍🤍🤍
💘1🔥1
✨🤩🤩🤩⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🔤🔤🔤 — Не ждали??? Да не ждали. Поль Верлен отметил что вы у нас любите Бинго и всякие тестики! И мы решили провести вам такого рода 🪡🧦🎂🌲🪟🍉🐮🎂🪡🧑🦰!! 🤍🤍🤍 ☺️🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬🎚️: 1. Вы можете написать о любом участнике он/она 10/10 , но.... Обязательно когда пишем негативное ниже написать положительное. 2. Можно написать и о себе. 3. Можно написать о нескольких участниках. Время интерактива : с 15 июля 18.50 д…
❤1
Видео от Верлена
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT68X71bq/
💓Здᴩᴀʙᴄᴛʙуй, ʍᴏй ʍиᴧый дᴩуᴦ, ᴋᴀᴋ ᴛы ᴄᴇбя чуʙᴄᴛʙуᴇɯь?) нᴇ бᴏиɯьᴄя, чᴛᴏ ᴛʙᴏй нᴏʙый ɜнᴀᴋᴏʍый нᴇ ᴏбычный чᴇᴧᴏʙᴇᴋ.. хᴇхᴇ, нᴇ бᴏйᴄя, я ᴨᴩᴏᴄᴛᴏ ɯучу! Иᴄᴨуᴦᴀᴧᴄя? Ꮋу ччᴛᴏ wine club ᴛᴇᴨᴇᴩь ʍы ᴄ ᴛᴏбᴏй ᴄʙяɜᴀны ᴄᴀʍᴏй ᴋᴩᴏʙью и ᴨᴧᴏᴛью, ни чᴛᴏ нᴀᴄ нᴇ ᴩᴀɜᴧучиᴛ.. ᴛᴀᴋ ʙᴇдь? Ꭼᴄᴧи ᴛы ʍᴇня бᴩᴏᴄиɯь, ᴛᴏ бᴏйᴄя ᴨᴏᴄᴧᴇдᴄᴛʙий.. ɯучу! Ꮚучу! Инɸᴏ-@info_bsd_Roleyplay_flood Ꮧᴀйɸ-@bsd_1_2
У нас с вами заключён первый союз. - с - 𝐄𝐱𝐪𝐮†𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫 Надеюсь, на то что обе стороны получат выгоду от Союза.
❤1🍓1🔥1
Внимание у нас есть некоторые изменения в проекте "wine cloud" 1. Убрали как обязательный пункт в анкете личный канал. 2. Информация : день рождения, часовой пояс и канал в одном. 3. Поправлен пост о соролах, внесён с саморолами и теми кто ещё не определился/ждёт кого-то конкретного. 4. Правила и сюжет открываются с помощью тыка в навигаторе без баннера и места в инфо. В виде телеграф. 5. Норма и чистка под ним …
❤3🔥3💋1💘1
⬇️ 🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🎀⭐🎀 Я знаю, что прошлая игра вам довольно понравилась, и это не может не радовать! ^^ Итак. Правила игры на сегодня. Представим что мы с вами оказались в бесконечном поезде. Что-то вроде аномалии, многие друг друга не знают, или знают о других очень мало. Чтобы выжить мы с вами должны закрепить знания друг о друге и не дать существам из вне нас обмануть. Сначало отвечаем на вопросы и предполагаем …
Наша игра оконченна. На голосование был выбран - Гоголь и он был мирным. Победили предатели. Мори и Коё. Умерли так два предателя - Поль и Чуя. Остальные были мирными изначально.
В медпункте был убит Шибусава
Элис находилась в медпункте недалеко от Шибусавы. Её убили. Возможно Шибу видел кто это сделал.
В ходе голосования, был выбран Артюр Рембо! Как оказалось позднее он не был предателем. Зато убитый Поль Верлен, был предателем. Погибших 3. Чуя, Поль, Рембо
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @bsd_1_2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,385,118 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᴾᵒˢᵗᶦᶰᵍ"ᴡɪɴᴇ ᴄʟᴜᴅ,,🥤” (@bsd_1_2), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bsd_1_2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.