Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Bruno Le Maire

@brunolemaire

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,483subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001562859788
TypeChannel
Username@brunolemaire
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/brunolemaire

Growth

1,4831,4881,485.57 August 2026 — 1,488 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,488 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,487 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,483 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,482–1,489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 11:581,483-4
11 Aug 2026, 02:281,487-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:161,488no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:041,488first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.3%
avg views ÷ 1,483 subscribers
Avg views / post
687
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held20 (7 October 202526 July 2026)
Views total687
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

526 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23444.5%
👍15128.7%
🥰366.84%
🐳173.23%
😢173.23%
👏142.66%
❤‍🔥112.09%
🙏91.71%
🔥61.14%
🤩61.14%
🏆50.951%
👎50.951%
💯40.76%
🤬40.76%
🕊30.57%
🎃20.38%
😐10.19%
🤔10.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 526reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 October 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC687 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ma singularité est claire : je veux changer de système, pas réformer le système ! Il est temps de construire #UneAutreFrance. Partagez le post et lisez l'interview.

14👍8👏4🤬1

16 Jun 2026, 21:14 UTC≈1,360 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Quelle victoire de nos Bleus ! 🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷 Premier pas vers la troisième étoile ! ⭐️⭐️⭐️ Bien joué malgré tout au Sénégal ! 🇸🇳

9🥰9🏆5👍3🤩3👎2🤬2🎃1

15 Jun 2026, 07:08 UTC≈1,120 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Un père ou une mère sait dans ses tripes quand quelque chose ne va pas chez son enfant. Dans notre pays, la parole des enfants n’est pas suffisamment écoutée. Tout comme la douleur indicible des parents. C'est révoltant !

👍15❤‍🔥61🕊1

10 Jun 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,180 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

La justice ne protège plus ses enfants. Ma tribune dans Le Figaro.

👍11🎃1🐳1

8 Jun 2026, 16:56 UTC958 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

SCAF : l'échec franco-allemand du jour doit préparer le sursaut européen de demain. Partagez ma publication.

😢7👍32🐳1🤔1

6 Jun 2026, 10:12 UTC805 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Avec Bernadette Chirac, la France perd une femme de devoir et de droiture. Sa discrétion cachait un engagement sans faille pour les autres. Son caractère, une considération pour toutes et tous. Elle aura beaucoup aimé la France, son histoire, ses territoires. Elle aura beaucoup aimé les Français. À Claude, à Frédéric et à toute leur famille, j’adresse mes pensées les plus affectueuses.

😢10🙏4🐳2👍1

4 Jun 2026, 09:22 UTC≈1,170 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

L'Europe n'a pas besoin de plus de technocrates, elle a besoin de plus d'ambition. L'union Franco-Allemande peut-être un facteur de liberté et de puissance pour l'Europe du XXIe siècle. Lire la tribune que j'ai l'honneur de signer avec Christoph Heusgen ! Et la partager 😉

17👏3❤‍🔥1

1 Jun 2026, 06:30 UTC811 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Choose France est le résultat d’un modèle qui marche. Alors : stop ou encore ? Je dis : encore, mais en passant la démultipliée. A partager !

👍14❤‍🔥2🔥2🕊21

28 May 2026, 14:42 UTC984 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ma conviction : la France et l'Europe doivent livrer la bataille de l'innovation avec des armes nouvelles pour espérer pouvoir défendre leur propre vision de l'IA. Celle du pape Léon XIV. Pas celle de Palantir. Je vous recommande deux lectures essentielles.

10👍7

26 May 2026, 14:43 UTC766 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

À demain, 8h10, sur France 2 !

👍11🥰6👏5

25 May 2026, 07:01 UTC697 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"C’est criminel d’avoir retiré cette réforme des retraites" Suite de mon intervention hier sur Franceinfo ! https://x.com/franceinfo/status/2058608411005063336?s=46

7👍3🥰3👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @brunolemaire. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 916,711 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bruno Le Maire” (@brunolemaire), 1,483 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brunolemaire.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.