Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Brox Calls ๐Ÿ‘พ

Channel

Brox Calls ๐Ÿ‘พ

@broxcalls

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Cite this entry

12,120subscribers

-120 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ€“31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002136396591
TypeChannel
Username@broxcalls
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/broxcalls

Growth

12,12012,24012,1807 August 2026 โ€” 12,240 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 12,240 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 12,236 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 12,229 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 12,223 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 12,214 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 12,211 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 12,203 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 12,190 subscribers15 August 2026 โ€” 12,174 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 12,169 subscribers18 August 2026 โ€” 12,158 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 12,146 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 12,147 subscribers21 August 2026 โ€” 12,133 subscribers22 August 2026 โ€” 12,120 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 15 days, net -120. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 12,102โ€“12,258 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 16:3512,120-13
21 Aug 2026, 08:2612,133-14
20 Aug 2026, 11:2212,147+1
19 Aug 2026, 08:0812,146-12
18 Aug 2026, 08:1212,158-11
17 Aug 2026, 11:2512,169-5
15 Aug 2026, 19:2412,174-16
14 Aug 2026, 11:3712,190-13
13 Aug 2026, 05:1812,203-8
12 Aug 2026, 03:0712,211-3
11 Aug 2026, 01:2512,214-9
10 Aug 2026, 02:4112,223-6
9 Aug 2026, 05:0212,229-7
8 Aug 2026, 07:4512,236-4
7 Aug 2026, 12:3112,240no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:2412,240first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
11.8%
avg views รท 12,120 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,430
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.87%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held30 (10 February 2026 โ€“ 22 August 2026)
Views total19,955
Reactions total323
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
โ‰ˆ1,010
Videos
โ‰ˆ20
Links
โ‰ˆ466

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

691 reactions across 28 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค27940.4%
๐Ÿ”ฅ20830.1%
๐Ÿ˜ญ405.79%
๐Ÿ†’192.75%
๐Ÿคฃ162.32%
๐Ÿ‘152.17%
โšก142.03%
๐Ÿ™142.03%
๐Ÿ‘Ž131.88%
๐Ÿ‘131.88%
๐Ÿ’ฏ121.74%
๐Ÿ’…111.59%
๐Ÿ˜ฑ71.01%
๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป50.724%
๐Ÿ’‹40.579%
๐Ÿ’ฉ40.579%
โœ30.434%
๐ŸŒญ30.434%
๐Ÿ˜30.434%
๐ŸŒ20.289%
5 further kinds60.868%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 691reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTCโ‰ˆ1,800 views13 reactionsread 23 August 2026

So no better time to lockin than now

๐Ÿ”ฅ7โค2๐Ÿพ2๐Ÿ’‹2

22 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTCโ‰ˆ1,810 views15 reactionsread 23 August 2026

And if we are not bottomed here? Great then you have a few more months to adapt to this market during chop before we resume the bull.

โค11๐ŸŒญ3๐Ÿ˜1

22 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTCโ‰ˆ1,070 views11 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

this is the monthly BTC Log chart. Imo it looks very similar bottom action wise feels like everyone got frontran on "buying the dip in october" but that's not even the point I am trying to make there. You know how many months we went up only after the bottom? 30 MONTHS even if we only do half this time you have 15 months of way easier market than the last 1.5 years

๐Ÿ‘6โค3๐ŸŒ2

22 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTCโ‰ˆ1,030 views14 reactionsread 23 August 2026

if we are truly bottomed already on BTC then this would have been the shortest and least painful bear market ever. last cycles we spend minimum 150+ days with -60% on BTC during bear this time we had 0 days, the difference is insane. Does that mean we get an even crazier bull or a weaker one? Hard to say, but I think we have a high chance that those social trading apps are gonna make crypto trading "cool" again anโ€ฆ

โค12๐Ÿ’‹2

22 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC975 views3 reactionsread 23 August 2026

https://x.com/ohbrox/status/2091218604624588857?s=20

๐Ÿคฎ1๐Ÿฆ„1๐Ÿ˜ด1

22 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTCโ‰ˆ1,070 views28 reactionsread 23 August 2026

How are the votes 50/50 wtf Social trading apps will be a must this cycle. You will miss out on so much information if you are not using them. Best ones are Fomo and Pump App right now. You can follow me on both: Fomo: brox Pump: brox And here you can register in both if you havenโ€™t Fomo & Pump Pump has lower fees, but fomo has better UI imo and lots of more users, I recommend just getting both and follow the โ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘Ž13๐Ÿคฃ7โค4๐Ÿ’ฉ4

22 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTCโ‰ˆ1,080 views8 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Its like its own funnel of information 2017-2021 we mainly got info from Reddit / 4chan 2021-2025 we mainly got info from X, tik tok, etc 2026 you will get all the info you need on fomo / pump app

โœ3๐Ÿคฃ2๐Ÿ˜2โค1

22 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTCโ‰ˆ1,120 viewsread 23 August 2026
Poll

Are you using Fomo?

  1. Yes49%
  2. No52%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTCโ‰ˆ1,190 views10 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

We were so early to fomo last year, that stats werenโ€™t event tracked back then. Seriously if you are not using it you are playing crypto on hard mode this cycle ngl

๐Ÿ’ฏ8๐Ÿ˜ญ2

22 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTCโ‰ˆ1,590 views25 reactionsread 23 August 2026

what just happened lmao

๐Ÿ˜ญ14๐Ÿ˜ฑ7๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป3๐Ÿคฃ1

22 Aug 2026, 03:22 UTCโ‰ˆ1,630 views22 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Definitely nailed the timing This week is about to be one of the best one we had on majors since years. Onchain still kinda dry but gonna quicky heat up imo, raise your targets and ceiling ๐Ÿซก

โค22

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @broxcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTCAnonymous Poll276 voters

Are you using Fomo?

  1. Yes49%
  2. No52%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œBrox Calls ๐Ÿ‘พโ€ (@broxcalls), 12,120 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/broxcalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.