So no better time to lockin than now
๐ฅ7โค2๐พ2๐2

Channel
@broxcalls
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Cite this entry
12,120subscribers
-120 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002136396591 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @broxcalls |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/broxcalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 12,120 | -13 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 12,133 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 12,147 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 12,146 | -12 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 12,158 | -11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 12,169 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 12,174 | -16 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 12,190 | -13 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 12,203 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 12,211 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 12,214 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:41 | 12,223 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 12,229 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 12,236 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 12,240 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 12,240 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 10 February 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (10 February 2026 โ 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19,955 |
| Reactions total | 323 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 23 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
691 reactions across 28 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 279 | 40.4% | |
| ๐ฅ | 208 | 30.1% | |
| ๐ญ | 40 | 5.79% | |
| ๐ | 19 | 2.75% | |
| ๐คฃ | 16 | 2.32% | |
| ๐ | 15 | 2.17% | |
| โก | 14 | 2.03% | |
| ๐ | 14 | 2.03% | |
| ๐ | 13 | 1.88% | |
| ๐ | 13 | 1.88% | |
| ๐ฏ | 12 | 1.74% | |
| ๐ | 11 | 1.59% | |
| ๐ฑ | 7 | 1.01% | |
| ๐จโ๐ป | 5 | 0.724% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 0.579% | |
| ๐ฉ | 4 | 0.579% | |
| โ | 3 | 0.434% | |
| ๐ญ | 3 | 0.434% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 0.434% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 0.289% | |
| 5 further kinds | 6 | 0.868% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 691reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
So no better time to lockin than now
๐ฅ7โค2๐พ2๐2
And if we are not bottomed here? Great then you have a few more months to adapt to this market during chop before we resume the bull.
โค11๐ญ3๐1
this is the monthly BTC Log chart. Imo it looks very similar bottom action wise feels like everyone got frontran on "buying the dip in october" but that's not even the point I am trying to make there. You know how many months we went up only after the bottom? 30 MONTHS even if we only do half this time you have 15 months of way easier market than the last 1.5 years
๐6โค3๐2
if we are truly bottomed already on BTC then this would have been the shortest and least painful bear market ever. last cycles we spend minimum 150+ days with -60% on BTC during bear this time we had 0 days, the difference is insane. Does that mean we get an even crazier bull or a weaker one? Hard to say, but I think we have a high chance that those social trading apps are gonna make crypto trading "cool" again anโฆ
โค12๐2
https://x.com/ohbrox/status/2091218604624588857?s=20
๐คฎ1๐ฆ1๐ด1
How are the votes 50/50 wtf Social trading apps will be a must this cycle. You will miss out on so much information if you are not using them. Best ones are Fomo and Pump App right now. You can follow me on both: Fomo: brox Pump: brox And here you can register in both if you havenโt Fomo & Pump Pump has lower fees, but fomo has better UI imo and lots of more users, I recommend just getting both and follow the โฆ
๐13๐คฃ7โค4๐ฉ4
Its like its own funnel of information 2017-2021 we mainly got info from Reddit / 4chan 2021-2025 we mainly got info from X, tik tok, etc 2026 you will get all the info you need on fomo / pump app
โ3๐คฃ2๐2โค1
Are you using Fomo?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
We were so early to fomo last year, that stats werenโt event tracked back then. Seriously if you are not using it you are playing crypto on hard mode this cycle ngl
๐ฏ8๐ญ2
what just happened lmao
๐ญ14๐ฑ7๐จโ๐ป3๐คฃ1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Definitely nailed the timing This week is about to be one of the best one we had on majors since years. Onchain still kinda dry but gonna quicky heat up imo, raise your targets and ceiling ๐ซก
โค22
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @broxcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Are you using Fomo?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 10 February 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โBrox Calls ๐พโ (@broxcalls), 12,120 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/broxcalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.