Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 319–346 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Sept 2026, 00:58
341
-2
4 Sept 2026, 20:58
343
+1
28 Aug 2026, 14:08
342
+5
22 Aug 2026, 12:32
337
+12
14 Aug 2026, 05:57
325
+3
8 Aug 2026, 07:31
322
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:13
322
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
222 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
85
38.3%
custom 5389038097860144794
35
15.8%
😁
30
13.5%
🎉
21
9.46%
😢
19
8.56%
💅
14
6.31%
custom 5192758015123532289
5
2.25%
custom 5188674033800978216
4
1.80%
custom 5456149049214249060
4
1.80%
custom 5456161246921369330
2
0.901%
🫡
2
0.901%
custom 5251637073244338321
1
0.45%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А если бы вы пошли на курсы бровиста , какая бы причина у вас была?
Я бы хотел(а) доп заработок а может и основной в последующем43%
Я бы хотел(а) делать себе и другим людям красивые брови43%
Я бы хотел( а) иметь такое хобби13%
Мне было бы просто интересно попробовать, без конкретных ожиданий13%
Мне хотелось бы попасть в какое-либо сообщество в целом , например в бьюти, например брови0%
Мне бы хотелось освоить ремесло руками с быстрым результатом до/после и быстрым дофамином 🤭22%
Мне нужна подстраховка от основной работы9%
Я в декрете и я бы обучилась , чтобы не сойти с ума9%
Свой вариант ( в комментах)0%
The shares total 152%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Девчат , Москва, нужна еще одна модель на брови ко мне.
Занятость час , это бесплатно ❤️
9.08 в 11:00
Важно:
- Вы старше 18 лет
- у Вас нет аллергии на воск
- Вы не проходите курс ретинола
- Вы согласны на съемку и публикацию материалов с Вами.
Пишите @browissimi
Ребят , график на август доступен к бронированию
Выбрать время онлайн
Важно: 22го августа я отлучусь на пару недель ( ложусь на пластику лица, кому интересно за этим наблюдать , велком в мой инст ) но перед началом осени успеем наделать вам красивых бровей 🥰
Клиентских дней не очень много, очень жду встречи.
Для связи лично , пишите - @browissimi ❤️
Брови в Москве. Брови Москва
Ну считаю гештальт с отпуском в Спб официально закрытым!
Проорать песни в Poison всю ночь - ✅
Встретить рассвет у залива - ✅
Завтра последний клиентский день и с чистой совестью в Москву 🥳
Плотно прошли две рабочие недели в СПб , но у меня есть подсолнух, хлеб , конфеты , ягоды , кофе , мазь от шеи , нимесил и куча чаевых 💅
Спасибо кошечки ! Чувствую себя баловнем 🥰
❤27
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @browissimi_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А если бы вы пошли на курсы бровиста , какая бы причина у вас была?
Я бы хотел(а) доп заработок а может и основной в последующем43%
Я бы хотел(а) делать себе и другим людям красивые брови43%
Я бы хотел( а) иметь такое хобби13%
Мне было бы просто интересно попробовать, без конкретных ожиданий13%
Мне хотелось бы попасть в какое-либо сообщество в целом , например в бьюти, например брови0%
Мне бы хотелось освоить ремесло руками с быстрым результатом до/после и быстрым дофамином 🤭22%
Мне нужна подстраховка от основной работы9%
Я в декрете и я бы обучилась , чтобы не сойти с ума9%
Свой вариант ( в комментах)0%
The shares total 152%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Browissimi.” (@browissimi_channel), 341 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/browissimi_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
