Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Bros GEM call 🧠

@bros_call

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

1,435subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001555991286
TypeChannel
Username@bros_call
CreatedBetween 1 July 2021 and 31 January 2023β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bros_call

Growth

1,4351,4381,436.57 August 2026 β€” 1,438 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 1,438 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 1,435 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,435–1,438 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:511,435-3
7 Aug 2026, 19:471,438no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:161,438first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 November 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
7.77%
avg views Γ· 1,435 subscribers
Avg views / post
112
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.24%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held20 (25 November 2025 – 16 July 2026)
Views total223
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

55 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀2647.3%
🀯1527.3%
πŸ‘712.7%
πŸ”₯35.45%
πŸ‘23.64%
πŸ€”23.64%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 01:46 UTC117 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Gamble 0x8bb617e7768db28800df7fe3329192910702068b https://x.com/TheRHRunner

❀3🀯1

13 Jul 2026, 03:22 UTC149 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$HOODBIRD New Buy! πŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’Ž πŸ’΅ 0.247 ETH ($442.77) πŸ‘€ Tx | Hash πŸ“ˆ +30.0% position πŸ“Š MC: $375.08K πŸ“’ Ads: Bridge in & Bridge Out , Acess : https://robinbridge.xyz/ βœ…

🀯2

13 Jul 2026, 03:21 UTC130 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Gambler 140k https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xa55d34c2ec5b296c8667b27761ac3d4750c5336b https://t.me/Hood_Bird

❀1

1 Jun 2026, 13:43 UTC270 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Hi Bob, Its Vitalik. Buy! 🟒🟒🟒🟒🟒🟒🟒🟒🟒🟒🟒 πŸ”€ Spent $195.71 (0.099 ETH) πŸ”€ Got 862,546 BOB πŸ‘€ Buyer / TX πŸͺ™ New Holder πŸ’Έ Market Cap $91,867 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending ⏺ #11 On ETH Trending πŸ”₯

1 Jun 2026, 13:34 UTC210 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Gamble on eth https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xBc9D3d80A22A06aeF99fBD5BB577F0092E8DFb06 https://t.me/HiBobItsVitalik

🀯2❀1

25 May 2026, 23:08 UTC227 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

2,5x from call. 250k ath , now 178k Chart locking good πŸš€πŸš€πŸš€

🀯3❀1

25 May 2026, 11:19 UTC231 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Gambler on sol https://dexscreener.com/solana/gejxwcgw9tt7olqqcpnysazvsb6uy9c9jqct9aezbmxg https://x.com/werldkupsol?s=21

🀯3πŸ‘1

22 May 2026, 12:36 UTC247 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Vitalien Buterin Buy! πŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’ŽπŸ’Ž πŸ’΅ 0.089 ETH ($189.98) πŸͺ™ 19,673,987 VITALIEN πŸ”· 0x79c3…0321 | Txn βœ… New Holder πŸ”Ό Market Cap $10,314 πŸ“Š Chart πŸ¦„ Trade πŸ”Ή Trending 🟒 Trending πŸ₯‡ @ETHTRENDING

πŸ€”2

22 May 2026, 12:29 UTC213 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Vitalien Buterin $VITALIEN πŸ‘½ Every chain has memes. ETH has an alien founder. In January 2022, Vitalik Buterin asked the internet for the craziest and most unhinged criticisms about him, and one viral reply said he β€œlooks like an alien crackhead.” Although the original tweet later disappeared from X, the screenshot and meme spread across crypto communities and became one of the origins of the legendary Vitalik Alie…

πŸ‘5❀4πŸ”₯3🀯2πŸ‘1

25 Mar 2026, 23:02 UTC351 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

6x from call. 130k to 800k ath πŸš€πŸš€

❀1

25 Mar 2026, 16:32 UTC339 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

3x now, 130k to 415k πŸš€πŸš€

❀1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bros_call. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œBros GEM call πŸ§ β€ (@bros_call), 1,435 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bros_call.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.