4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,450–1,456 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 03:24
1,451
-3
11 Aug 2026, 02:52
1,454
-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:01
1,455
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:44
1,455
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 23 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
33s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
146 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
61
41.8%
👍
41
28.1%
🔥
24
16.4%
😁
13
8.90%
🤯
5
3.42%
custom 5866369239740320716
2
1.37%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 September 2025 to 27 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @brokerqb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 September 2025 to 27 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💵 Новый стейбл USAT, как забрать на MEXC +$50
На MEXC запустили временную акцию в разделе Сбережения.
Что дают по факту:
- Стейкинг USAT на 30 дней
- До 200 USAT — 300% годовых (Это ≈ $50 чистыми за месяц с одного аккаунта)
- На суммы свыше 200 USAT — 20% годовых
Важно:
• USAT — долларовый стейбл, привязка 1:1
USAT (или USA₮) — это новый долларовый стейблкоин от компании Tether, официально запущенный 27 января…
🎁 Аукцион подарков — как это работает
⚙️ Общие правила
- Всего в аукционе разыгрывается 1000 подарков.
- Аукцион разделён на 50 раундов.
- В каждом раунде выдаётся 20 подарков (20 × 50 = 1000).
💰 Ставки
- Минимальная ставка для участия уже начинается от 8000 звёзд.
- Чтобы попасть в топ-20 текущего раунда, ставка должна быть от 200 000 звёзд и выше.
⏱️ Длительность раундов
- Первый раунд длится 1 час.
- Все след…
💵 Статистика по кошелькам OpenSea (PRE TGE Season 2)
Ну что, друзья, если сравнивать с прошлым сезоном: тогда у нас участвовало 390 тысяч кошельков, а в этом — всего 204 тысячи. Почти вдвое меньше участников принимают участие во втором сезоне.
Скорее всего, дело в том, что многие, кто рассчитывал на сундуки Wood, Iron, Steel просто решили скипнуть.
Но даже если взглянуть на сундук Titanium — тот самый, за который …
Monad - есть ли еще шанс получить AirDrop?
1️⃣ Еще 9 октября во время AMA у ThreadGuy директор по развитию Monad (Intern) заявил, что классического чекера с клеймом не будет.
Вместо него будет ограничено во времени окно, во время действия которого для получения токенов нужно будет выполнить определенные действия. Если пропустили или не успели – дроп пролетает мимо.
Так вот к чему я веду - мало кто обратил внимание…
💵 OpenSea — GG (открываем сундуки за 1 сезон)
От 1 до 3 включительно — дают (понюхать бебру) только бейдж.
Начиная с 4 уровня, уже идёт небольшая насыпка крипты. Если смотреть по чатам, то видно, что по тому, что раздали, это покрыло от силы ~35% затрат на комиссии. И то — это только покрывает сезон с сундуками, не говоря уже про первый и второй вояж.
Расчёты затрат для фарма:
(Указанно сколько на выбор нужно сдел…
💵 Новости по OpenSea
OpenSea сообщили, что открыть сундуки можно будет примерно через пару дней — после того, как они подведут итоги. Параллельно уже запущен второй сезон.
Жду, что насыпят за первый. Если хотя бы 50% комиссий, потраченных во время второго вояжа и первого сезона сундуков, отобьются — буду дальше крутить.
Если же нет, приостановлю активность и просто подожду дропа токена $SEA.
РОЗДАЛИ ВСЕМ, КРОМЕ ТЕСТНЕТЧИКОВ
Вот для чего они вводили фулл-аксесс?
Для чего все эти коллекции?
Все эти NFT, которые они раздавали в X?
В итоге оказалось, что всем плевать на активность комьюнити.
По сути, тестнетеров просто подогревали ради метрик.
А дроп получили те, у кого в сети Monad могло не быть ни одной транзакции -
зато на кошельке лежала NFT из топовой коллекции либо был большой деп в DeFi протоколах.
…
MONAD чекер: https://claim.monad.xyz/
Пока что даже подключиться к чекеру не получается — сайт дико виснет.
Снимок был сделан 30 сентября.
Из вот ЭТОЙ статьи известно, что дроп получат только 230 500 кошельков, и главными критериями была активность в других сетях и проектах, помимо Monad.
Жду, пока сайт раздуплится, и дам фидбэк, что у меня получилось.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @brokerqb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 839,993 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BROKER💰” (@brokerqb), 1,451 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brokerqb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.