Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

bridge of words

@bridgeofwords

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

231subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002080960828
TypeChannel
Username@bridgeofwords
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/bridgeofwords

Growth

2316 Aug 2026, 04:32 — 231 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:47 — 231 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 04:327 Aug 2026, 02:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 230–232 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:47231no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:32231first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 16 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.3%
avg views ÷ 231 subscribers
Avg views / post
107
1 post measured
Reaction rate
15.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held10 (16 May 20261 August 2026)
Views total107
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
318
Videos
18
Links
72

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

153 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53212517328339914383623.5%
custom 53056605248081330083422.2%
custom 54607709322409599452516.3%
custom 54722078589195509032113.7%
custom 51951545596300621192013.1%
custom 5391346324954163409138.50%
custom 546102910272513561721.31%
custom 547218170256873752321.31%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC107 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

august is here, let’s enjoy it together!! 🫤 we’ll have a reading session with discussion and sharing good books recs, and a picnic as a great way to sum up summer moments and memories come join us!! 🏷️ tickets

custom 54722078589195509039custom 51951545596300621196custom 54721817025687375232

12 Jul 2026, 05:18 UTC223 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

and special thanks to @tanyamvlw for capturing our meeting in such a cozy way 🤍

custom 532125173283399143811custom 54607709322409599455custom 54722078589195509033custom 54610291027251356171

12 Jul 2026, 05:14 UTC177 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

thank you soooooo much for joining our walking-sketching-speaking club yesterday, it was so wholesome to see all of your artworks 🤩

custom 532125173283399143815

29 Jun 2026, 11:48 UTC250 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

всем приветик!! 🤩 план на июль готов — две встречи-наблюдения с последующими обсуждениями, будем замечать (и даже рисовать!) тени, а ещё искать разные предметы определенного цвета на коротких прогулках в городе приходите и приводите с собой друзей, вместе веселее 🤩 билетики тут

custom 54607709322409599457custom 54722078589195509034custom 53212517328339914382

19 Jun 2026, 11:48 UTC250 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

всем привет! 🤩 мы активно планируем новые форматы на июль (и уже полюбившиеся тоже планируем - пикник будет!) а пока хотим спросить how’s your summer been so far? 🤝 скидывайте фото прикольных моментов в комментарии, полюбуемся вместе (а от нас - фото с поездки в красноярск!) 🤩

custom 53212517328339914388custom 54607709322409599457custom 51951545596300621193

8 Jun 2026, 07:01 UTC269 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌷

custom 51951545596300621199custom 54607709322409599456custom 54722078589195509035

7 Jun 2026, 05:30 UTC205 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

напоминание: встречаемся на games night уже сегодня! 🎲

custom 53913463249541634098

1 Jun 2026, 06:34 UTC296 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

happy 1st day of summer!! 🍧 собираемся на games night в карте мира 7 июня! билетики тут приходите играть, болтать и веселиться p.s. наши пикники планируем на каждый летний месяц, анонсы будут чуть ближе к событиям, stay tuned 🧺

custom 53056605248081330088custom 53913463249541634095custom 51951545596300621192custom 54610291027251356171

16 May 2026, 11:17 UTC267 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53056605248081330089

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @bridgeofwords. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 7,203 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“bridge of words” (@bridgeofwords), 231 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bridgeofwords.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.