Выпуск №028 КОНТРОЛЬ БЕЗ APPROVE Почему на боевом сервере coding-агент в CLI работает в YOLO, а человек всё равно остаётся в процессе — только не на каждой кнопке, а на порогах, где ошибка необратима.

Channel
Evgenii Brenzovich
@brenzovich_ai
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
179subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003419914304 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @brenzovich_ai |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/brenzovich_ai |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 17:01 | 179 | +2 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 177 | +3 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 174 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 173 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 172 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 172 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 36s
- Average length
- 48s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 15 | 55.6% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 18.5% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 14.8% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Зачем мы в будущем нужны будем роботам на ИИ, если они будут умнее нас, а мы потребители их ресурсов? Если люди вытесняют остальные виды, почему более эволюционный вид не решит вытеснить людей?
ОБНОВЛЕНО Hysteria2 - пока стабильна. + добавлен отдельный скрипт установки, если у вас уже был 3x-ui https://ai.arckep.ru/vpn/
Ждем грок 4.6 сегодня. С клода уже около месяца как ушел. Кими для исследований и анализа, грок для работы.
Выпуск №027 УПРАВЛЕНЧЕСКИЙ УЧЁТ В статье обзор модуля. _ Не совсем типичное. Выложил в opensource пока урезанную версию моей системы учета с прогнозированием. Подойдёт для личных финансов и МСП. Можно развернуть у себя или бесплатно попробовать. У меня половина затрат там автоматизирована - тянется по api из разных систем, в том числе расчетные счета в банках. Позже расширим функционал и автоматизацию подключения…
🔥3
70% населения Америки противники ИИ.
😱4
Есть управленцы из малого и среднего бизнеса?
- Да75%
- Нет25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Одни стали умнее, а вторые резко тупее Раньше внимание убивал думскроллинг и в маркетинге все боролись с этой проблемой - выделяли основное, убирали второстепенное, старались зацепить за пару секунд. Начиналось все с 6 секунд, а через пару лет исследования показывали уже 3 секунды на внимание. С появлением ИИ появилась новая группа тупых, невнимательных и поверхностных. Во-первых, люди научились пересылать друг-др…
💯1
Добавили генерацию карточек к Ozon Улучшили соблюдение охранных зон для WB и Ozon
🔥1
У Тинькова вышло новое интервью на дожде. В целом, ничего нового. Но сказал, что они готовы брать себе в Plata людей уезжающих из России, если они специалисты высокого уровня. Тренд на хантинг специлистов и инженеров из России в других странах кажется еще никуда не ушел.
Выпуск №026 ЛОКАЛЬ ИЛИ ПРОВАЙДЕР Сколько токенов расходуют обычный пользователь и разработчик, во сколько обойдётся облако на 100 и 1000 человек, какие модели действительно разворачивают у себя — и почему попытка «поднять всё дома» на общем сервере почти никогда не экономит деньги.
К вопросу вымирания многих Saas Раньше мы покупали управленческие программы для учёта, сегодня на ИИ строим за пару часов полноценные системы доходов/расходов и прогнозирования.
🔥2💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @brenzovich_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Есть управленцы из малого и среднего бизнеса?
- Да75%
- Нет25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Evgenii Brenzovich” (@brenzovich_ai), 179 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brenzovich_ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.