https://twitter.com/TheBraunii/status/1780797334785265721?t=U_GgFipL94nbAklUOG5uTw&s=19
❤1
Signed TheBrauni

Channel
@braunicryptoscanal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
13subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001644275494 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @braunicryptoscanal |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/braunicryptoscanal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 13 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 14 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 14 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2024 to 18 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://twitter.com/TheBraunii/status/1780797334785265721?t=U_GgFipL94nbAklUOG5uTw&s=19
❤1
Signed TheBrauni
https://twitter.com/TheBraunii/status/1780027171936846153?t=W9qLprpTjuogSlyYX0XW4w&s=19 play now in 250K, Fill your pockets but with caution we have 83.4% in favor according to my analysis time will determine if they will continue to rise lowering those odds.
Signed TheBrauni
https://twitter.com/TheBraunii/status/1779203646791594394?t=LABWAFHYgcO5vwvHyASWzw&s=19 There are big people interested in this I told you so, in the meantime we carried a 2X (600k > 1.3M) since my call currently Marketcap at 1.3M Follow the smart money.
Signed TheBrauni
https://twitter.com/TheBraunii/status/1778974167716495837?t=zhsEULgIhvTRnNcdAL4zNQ&s=19 check this thread, actually Marketcap is 600k 👀 ath on 5.5m+
Signed TheBrauni
$DSB Be smart don't get carried away by emotions we are in an accumulation market feeling it is easy to determine that the reason why the project is not going up is because nothing is going up there are periods and cycles just keep doing what the team has been doing and innovate this is like a soccer team, what is the consequence of playing well? The GOAL! "If you play well, the goal will come, we don't know when bu…
Signed TheBrauni
$DSB After my thread on twitter the price has been progressively rising for the last 2 hour rising over 70% tonight will we pass and mark an ATH above 5M? It is not far fetched 🔥🚀
👍1
Signed TheBrauni
https://twitter.com/TheBraunii/status/1778593889256865959?t=OnkCOLYhF1u4c-M7k6zgew&s=19
👏1
Signed TheBrauni
$DBS Ath now is 1.8M X2 From my call 🔥 900k > 1.8M I got you
Signed TheBrauni
$DBS EASY X2 FROM DIP 500k > 1.2M 🔥🔥
👍1
Signed TheBrauni
$DBS launching son in 3m https://t.me/devsellingportal Risk 2/5 J3pyAD1hhBtbFVfgfhrBmkauv49YhhHoULk4U9wvPCnx Based dev, is a bot on telegram Widely used 🟡
Signed TheBrauni
https://twitter.com/TheBraunii/status/1778197486634741936?t=ySAbT1Gjzn9pssy8mE3nCg&s=19 read
Signed TheBrauni
Ath now is 1m Marketcap 250K > 1M easy 4x from my call ✅ I got you 🔥
Signed TheBrauni
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @braunicryptoscanal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@braunicryptoscanal named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BrauniCryptos 🍩 Canal” (@braunicryptoscanal), 13 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/braunicryptoscanal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.