Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Темная Кухня

@brainskitchen

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

191subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002248814089
TypeChannel
Username@brainskitchen
DescriptionКухня автора канала @brainshare Рассказываю узкому кругу про темные паттерны, истории под NDA, пощу мемасы, обсуждаю игры и кино — в общем все, что я бы делал на кухне с друзьями
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/brainskitchen

Growth

1917 Aug 2026, 15:35 — 191 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 12:00 — 191 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:358 Aug 2026, 12:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 190–192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 12:00191no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:35191first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 19 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
88
Videos
10
Links
40

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
923.1%
🤡717.9%
😁615.4%
👍410.3%
🤝37.69%
😐25.13%
😢25.13%
❤‍🔥12.56%
💩12.56%
🔥12.56%
🙈12.56%
🤨12.56%
🥴12.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2025 to 7 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jul 2025, 18:09 UTC163 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @pavel_egorkin

— мы прожили половину 2025-года — олсо теперь мы ближе к 2050 чем к 2000

😐1

29 Jun 2025, 09:22 UTC267 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Впервые в жизни вижу такой прикол, что приложение не дают скачать из-за того что у меня слишком новая версия андроида 😂

😁5

26 Jun 2025, 05:24 UTC231 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как же грустно читать все эти комментарии в соц сетях. Про Израиль, Иран, Россию, Украину (решил даже удалить X Platform и отписаться ото всех в инстаграме и фейсбуке). Столько агрессии и ненависти к друг другу у людей, которые даже ни разу не встречались, которые совершенно не знакомы. Что это если не «программы», зашитые в систему убеждение и мировоззрение. Даже если тебе сейчас хуярят ракетой по голове — это тож

🤡7👍1💩1🥴1

23 Jun 2025, 13:32 UTC191 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Когда слетал в Токио на пару минут

😁1

2 Jun 2025, 08:29 UTC238 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

прикол конечно все что есть в плане ценностей — все это так или иначе управляется деньгами все были такие толерантные, но когда сменился президент, сразу переобулись потому что в ценности эти не верят, а используют их для набора аудитории и репутации

1

2 Jun 2025, 08:29 UTC271 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dankmarketingPhoto

Бренды в этом году решили не поддерживать месяц прайда. Впервые за долгие годы официальные аккаунты больших компаний не поменяли аватарки на радужные 1 июня Речь идёт не только об американских отделениях, но и о европейских. Видимо, на ближайшие 4 года традиция отменяется

😢21🙈1

23 May 2025, 07:25 UTC282 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вначале ты спотыкаешь о феминитивы, а потом читаешь позицию "виртуальный - такой же настоящий, но тут возможные разные ответы". Обожаю таких экспертов и эксперток.

20 May 2025, 17:14 UTC217 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Терапия, IFS, психоанализ, гештальт, расстановки и десятки других методологий потихоньку превращают наше поколение в кучку роботов, которые общаются между собой на бездушном лексиконе психологии, где человек воспринимается как набор «программ», «частей», «травм»… Кто-то вообще доходит до того, что о себе в третьем лице говорит: «Моя часть раненого ребёнка обижается на твои слова». Или «мой защитник ответил тебе груб

🤝3🤨1😐1

17 May 2025, 02:29 UTC194 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @pavel_egorkin

В классическом уже фильме «Black Hawk Down», упавший эпонимный Black Hawk — это один из самых известных и массово используемых вертолётов в мире. У него дофига специализированных модификаций, включая секретный малошумный и малозаметный для радаров вариант, на котором успешно слетали убить Бин Ладена. Black Hawk — основной вертолёт армии США с 1979 года, когда он заменил легендарный «Ирокез» (сцена с «Полётом валькир

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @brainskitchen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Темная Кухня” (@brainskitchen), 191 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brainskitchen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.