4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,563–1,572 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 04:04
1,571
+4
10 Aug 2026, 06:35
1,567
+3
6 Aug 2026, 23:00
1,564
no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:48
1,564
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 28 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.4%
avg views ÷ 1,571 subscribers
Avg views / post
415
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held
16 (28 April 2026 – 29 July 2026)
Views total
415
Reactions total
8
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
146 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
52
35.6%
❤
46
31.5%
🙏
38
26.0%
❤🔥
7
4.79%
👍
2
1.37%
🥰
1
0.685%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡️ищем протагонистов
готовим новый спринт в комьюнити.
тут дима про него уже начал рассказывать - подхватим тут.
всю прошлую неделю мы исследовали вопрос: а что сейчас стало возможно делать с агентами с телефона, грубо говоря, из коробки?
gpt work для нас оч сильный сигнал и в целом это было ещё раньше понятно, что уже сейчас управлять своими делами, проектами вместе с агентами можно без проблем с телефона
да и …
fable 5 вернули в подписки до 7 июля
если вы работаете в claude code через приложение, а не терминал, то рекомендуем обновить приложение и проверить доступ
ещё по новым правилам на неё можно потратить до 50% квоты в вашей подписке
кто откладывал тест модели в тот раз - сейчас самое время потестировать на своих задачах 😉
видим много коммуникации про то, что модель может быть уже не такая бойкая, как до ограничений.…
⚡️ запускаем новый формат в комьюнити - ии утро / ai morning
это такие чиловые утренние созвоны про то, как ai реально используют в продуктах, маркетинге, операционке и жизни.
первый делаем с Сашей Колмайером (CРO Сила Ветра) в это воскресенье в 9:30 мск
думаем, многие уже слышали про то, как сша ограничило доступ к fable и на этой волне хочется посмотреть в то, а что есть кроме open ai / anthropic - китайские мод…
зацените контент
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjsPTMT8Vcw
мы завтра начинаем следующий спринт в комьнюнити - creative os. вот тут рассказывали, как про него думаем
сейчас действительно очень много дум-сценариев про будущее с ии и мы хотим воспользоваться коллективным сознательным и бессознательным и посмотреть в:
- как я сейчас думаю про своё будущее с ии
- какие слои у меня там поднимаются
- как ии может меня …
птичка нашептала, что у Hermes вышло на той неделе обновление, поэтому, если у вас отваливается ваш hermes стабильно раз в несколько дней - обновите его и всё починится
а накидайте огонёчков, если пользуетесь Hermes
❤️🔥 - openclaw
🙏 - наблюдаете за всем
⚡️докатывается обновления codex
несколько недель назад open ai начал раскатывать доступ к сессии codex через телефон. не всем тогда ещё докатилось и у нас в команде тоже не было
проверяйте свои codex. обязательно обновите (кнопочка слева сверху обновить)
если уже игрались - расскажите как вам 👇
от «не знаю с чего начать» до «строю свои архитектуры»
дайджест лабы - день 1
прошёл первый звонок лабы по здоровью. на звонке знакомились и рассказывали кто с чем пришёл. ниже несколько историй.
одна участница вошла в gpt через свою бессонницу. полгода долго засыпала, в голове бежали мысли. gpt научил её концентрироваться на теле и держать фокус - проблема ушла. теперь хочет идти дальше: спорт, питание, сон через…
друзья, нам написали много людей про лабу сейчас. мы хотим сделать эксперимент и дать возможность почувствовать тему, группу и потом принять решение
если хотите зайти, но сомневаетесь - напишите там и мы дадим доступ на сегодняшний звонок https://t.me/m/vbyRd_mBZjc5
черпать идеи и получить вдохновения
ах да, лаба для меня уже окупилась: я полгода прокрастинировала свою health OS, но пару дней назад села и собрала уже кодексом свои данные whoop, историю с эл. весов, анализы за 7 лет, анамнез и прочие medications&supplements
на лабе хочу обработать свой последний чекап и из него создать себе поддерживаемые протоколы.
настроить для себя систему контроля и поддержания здоровья, н…
чатик по лабе
друзья, все, кто зашёл в лабу по здоровью, проверяйте сообщение от нас. мы открыли чат участников
сейчас там знакомимся, проверяем, что у всех получилось поставить codex. если потеряли доступы, то напишите нам @blrofficialsupport
завтра делаем первый звонок. доступы, записи, чат с вами остаются навсегда. можно зайти будет в любое время
→ как тоня и маша строят свои системы здоровья
→ подробнее про л…
у нас для вас классная новость (мы очень заряжены)
это постик из комьюнити, мы его специально не редактировали для вас.
вокруг ai сейчас плотный пессимистичный нарратив: отнимет работу, обесценит труд.
одна из наших ценностей комьюнити, которую мы хотим культивировать - смотреть в то, что наоборот нам всем помогает и давать туда больше внимание.
недавно Peter Diamandis (xprize foundation) выкатил future vision xp…
это штучки, которые транскрибируют все ваши войсы в текст в любом приложении на компе34%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @brainloveandrobots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 392,589 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“brain, love and robots” (@brainloveandrobots), 1,571 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brainloveandrobots.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.