Channel
@braindevs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
19,557subscribers
-131 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001497091790 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @braindevs |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 19 February 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/braindevs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 19,557 | -12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 19,569 | -26 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 19,595 | -32 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 19,627 | -26 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 19,653 | -21 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 19,674 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 19,686 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 19,688 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 19,688 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 February 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
🖐 Since December, we have been experiencing problems with our amazing bot @rreadbot and the service for easy reading a.devs.today. We have worked hard to restore the functionality of the service. 😱 Today all the problems have been solved and the bot is working well again! ❤️ We are grateful to everyone who uses our services and supports us with donations during this difficult time. Thank you!
🗣 About advertising in @MentionBot Since the support of our projects requires effort, time and money, and we do not have enough rare support with donations from our users, we launch advertising in @MentionBot. Read more: https://telegra.ph/About-advertising-in-MentionBot-06-25
BrainDev Channel pinned «👋 Salut! Our bots have always remained free and we have never bothered our users with advertising. But the development and support of our projects requires effort, time and money. We will be glad of any support from your side :) You can help bots with…»
⚙️ Branded Mention Bot Our users asked us to run their own copy of @MentionBot - for example, to give the bot a different name and avatar. Today we give this opportunity to everyone: * No ads * Stable work * Custom name and profile picture ▶️ START YOUR COPY OF MENTIONBOT HERE
https://bugs.telegram.org/c/19148/27
https://www.techtracker.in/2022/08/telegram-is-not-so-unlimited-active.html
Telegram's Message Limit: Old Messages Gone Forever Telegram's main web page boasts that the service has «no limits» on the size of chats. However, with careful testing, we can find this statement false — that after a given number of messages (around 1 million), Telegram will stop serving you your own messages. This limitation is found both in channels/supergroups as well as private messages as a whole. Those encou…
🔥Instant Read Bot updated We've made @rreadbot a little bit smarter and more beautiful! Enjoy its features: • Inline mode: type @rreadbot in any chat and then paste link to article • Groups and DM: you can add the bot to group by this link or use it right in the direct messages • Channels: add @rreadbot to your channel with permission to edit posts and the bot will create Instant View for first link in each post A…
Instant View for any link Telegram supports Instant View technology, which allows you to view the site without leaving the corners of our favorite messenger, but in order for the site to support it, the site owner needs to go through a lot of actions. We are trying to eliminate this shortcoming and are releasing our bot: @rreadbot, which will try to generate an instant viewing opportunity for an unsupported site.
Our support account was unexpectedly lost tonight 😔 But we have already created new support with the new username @teleX :) If you have written to us before please contact us again at @teleX
We are happy to announce that @MentionRobot has now been translated not only into Russian and English, but also into: • 🇹🇷 Turkish, thanks to @MrFlyman • 🇮🇩 Indonesian, thanks to @hdiiofficial and to @julioFz, who corrected the Indonesian language If you also want to help us with translating the bot into languages such as Arabic and others, write to @teleX, we will be very glad of your help! :) And stay tuned, ano…
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @braindevs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 509,198 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@braindevs named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BrainDev Channel” (@braindevs), 19,557 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/braindevs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.