Channel
@bragino_yar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,083subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002616829346 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bragino_yar |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bragino_yar |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 1,083 | +1 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 1,082 | +3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 1,079 | +2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 1,077 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 1,078 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 1,077 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 1,078 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 1,076 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 20 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
66 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 19 | 28.8% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 15.2% | |
| 🤡 | 10 | 15.2% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 13.6% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 10.6% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 7.58% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 4.55% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.52% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.52% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
♻️ ООО «Мовиста Регионы Ярославль» о благоустройстве пешеходных зон вдоль трамвайных путей: «В настоящее время работы сосредоточены на реконструкции двух путепроводов и обновлению трамвайных путей в Ленинском и Кировском районах Ярославля. Тротуары входят в общий план благоустройства, но работы на них начнутся позже». 💥 Подпишись на канал любимого района в Telegram 📹 Мы в VK | 🟣 Мы в MAX
🤬2😢1
😐 Вечное благоустройство... 💥 Подпишись на канал любимого района в Telegram 📹 Мы в VK | 🟣 Мы в MAX
🤡2😁1
🥲 Все новые остановки на Бабича и Труфанова уже изуродованы... Неужели выгодней бесконечно ремонтировать, чем подсоединить видеонаблюдение?! "Мовиста", вы там нормальные вообще?.. 💥 Подпишись на канал любимого района в Telegram 📹 Мы в VK | 🟣 Мы в MAX
🤬4😱1
🌞 Тёплый августовский денёк 💥 Подпишись на канал любимого района в Telegram 📹 Мы в VK | 🟣 Мы в MAX
❤3💯2🥰2
😱 А это Тутаевское шоссе, 101. Здесь гулявший по ночному Брагино мишка внезапно начал паниковать. 💥 Подпишись на канал любимого района в Telegram 📹 Мы в VK | 🟣 Мы в MAX
🤯4😱3
😳 В ночь на воскресенье, 23 августа, жители Дзержинского района среди жилых домов заметили... молодого медведя. В Сети также появились запись с камер видеонаблюдения. Медвежонок около половины третьего бродил по дворам на улице Пашуковской, затем направился в сторону корпусов девятой больницы. А кому-то даже довелось увидеть мишку вживую в районе пересечения Тутаевского шоссе и улицы Бабича. К счастью, обошлось без …
🤯5😱3
🥲 Житель района ругается: «Здравствуйте, обратите внимание! Пешеходная дорожка по Ленинградскому проспекту от велодрома до торгового центра „РИО“, 2025 г. По дорожке можно было ходить с удовольствием! После ремонта трамвайных путей дорожки не стало, так должно быть? Жилой массив от ТЦ „РИО“, три остановки, по пути бизнес-центры „Омега“, „Альфа“ и т. д., расстояние прогулки как по Волжской Набережной, где люди гуляют…
🤬6💯2
❤️ Сегодня 712 лет Толгской обители Фото: Darklars Rudyy 💥 Подпишись на канал любимого района в Telegram 📹 Мы в VK | 🟣 Мы в MAX
❤3🥰1
🥲 Подписчица ругается: «Школа № 26 продолжает свою экспансию на окрестности. Пошла вырубка сквера перед входом в школу». 💥 Подпишись на канал любимого района в Telegram 📹 Мы в VK | 🟣 Мы в MAX
🤬3💯1🤡1
🥲 Жители домов №№ 46, 48, 48а по Ленинградскому проспекту жалуются, что в их дворе растут около 20 старых аварийных деревьев. «При сильном ветре они могут травмировать проходящих по двору людей. Жители обращались с заявками в "Управдом Дзержинского района", но УК ответила, что комиссия выходила с проверкой и не признала деревья аварийными и предложила собственникам, если им не нравятся эти деревья, сделать собрание,…
🤡1🤬1
🏠 Строится 14-й микрорайон. 1984 год. Узнали место? 💥 Подпишись на канал любимого района в Telegram 📹 Мы в VK | 🟣 Мы в MAX
❤4🔥1
🥲 Жительница района жалуется на трамваи: «20 лет мучились из-за скрежета трамваев. Обрадовались было, что шум пропадёт после замены путей. Не тут-то было! Скрежет снова появился, не прошло и года! Устали уже от этого вида транспорта, хоть переезжай… Пользуются трамваями 10 человек, а 1000 мучаются от шума». 💥 Подпишись на канал любимого района в Telegram 📹 Мы в VK | 🟣 Мы в MAX
🤡6🤬3
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @bragino_yar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ярославль Дзержинский район” (@bragino_yar), 1,083 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bragino_yar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.