go to @werefriendship

Channel
BPINKVELVECT MPPS
@bpinkvelvect
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001265993172 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bpinkvelvect |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 14 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bpinkvelvect |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
BPINKVELVECT MPPS pinned «close partnership‼️»
🆙
🆙
🆙
🆙
🆙
🆙
🆙
🆙
🆙
.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bpinkvelvect. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 938,636 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 76 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@avadachannel · 353 posts✶ ALTAR!EZ ✶ HIRING ADMIN
@ALTAR1EZ · 182 posts[OPEN PASIEN] 𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐌𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐤𝐚 𝐇𝐨𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥
@Everlandmedikahspital · 212 posts𝙂𝙪𝙢𝙢𝙞𝙚𝙨 𝘿𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮
@gummiesdelivery_mv_mv_mv · 192 postsOFC 𝕳𝐈𝐆𝐖𝐀𝐘𝐌𝐀𝐍 [ VAKUM ]
@HIGWAYMANOFC · 162 postsOPMEM - OFC RAVENOUS
@ravenousofc · 152 posts𝐀𝐑𝐒𝐈𝐏 𝐏𝐒 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐁𝐁𝐄𝐃 𝐆𝐀𝐍𝐆
@SBGARSIP · 22 postsOFC. 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝘼𝙂𝙀𝙉𝙏 𝙂–𝙕 || VAKUM
@TheAgentZ · 762 postssᨣ̸ft 𝛎ɩ︩︪llꬰցꫀ
@angkringansoftvilagge · 151 postARSIP ABADDON
@ARSIPABADDON · 11 postBLYTHEROUX OFC
@Blytheroux · 191 post𝐃𝐃𝐀𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐍𝐆
@ddaengrpw · 151 postDJ PARTNERSHIP
@DJMPPS · 41 post𝐌𝐀𝐑𝐊𝐀𝐒 𝐊𝐉𝐍
@markaskjn · 51 post[OPENLINK] 𝐍𝐘𝐗𝐂𝐎𝐄𝐔𝐒 𝐒𝐐𝐔𝐀𝐃
@NYXCOEUS · 241 postPINDAH ! @CWOOMINGSOON
@o567pride · 191 postWΛRKØP 731
@OFC731 · 141 postせ — 𝐎fc 𝐌miyh 𝐒q ᵢᵎ
@ofcmmiyhsq · 101 postOFC VILLA STRAYKIDZ
@OFCVKIDZ · 221 postὍℋᏃᎩፐΟGEፐℎEℛ੭ੋ੍ // bubar
@OHZYTOGETHEROFC · 41 postBubar, free unsub
@Olenyevagojek · 51 postPS SCETSRIC
@psScetsric · 31 postSKY PHOENIX [ HIATUS ]
@skyphoenixofc · 521 postZAVOS LABEL
@ZAVOSLABELMPPS · 31 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@argestodsq · 31 post174. D'LOST EMPIRE
@DLOSTEMPIRE · 3531 post𝟯𝟬𝟭.𝗠𝗔𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗢 𝗝𝗘𝗞𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗛𝗔
@MAESTROJEKATEHA · 2911 post𝐍𝐂𝐓 𝐌Λ𝐍𝐒𝐈Θ𝐍 Ø𝐅𝐂
@NCTMANSION · 461 post𝐎𝐅𝐂 𝐁𝐀𝐒𝐄 𝐍𝐂𝐓
@OFCBASENCT · 1791 post𝐍𝐞𝐨𝐳𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐤𝐢𝐝𝐳𝐲_𝟗
@OFCNZKY9 · 2881 post𝗧𝗡𝗦𝗧 𝗦𝗤𝗨𝗔𝗗
@ofctnst · 6191 post𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗔𝗟.
@THECONTINENTALBAR · 13,9171 postTeman Zombie
@werefriendship · 21 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 6
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 6
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@bpinkvelvect named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BPINKVELVECT MPPS” (@bpinkvelvect), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bpinkvelvect.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.