Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Boykot qildim - Isroilga baykot

Channel

Boykot qildim - Isroilga baykot

@boykot_qildim

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,554subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002008072529
TypeChannel
Username@boykot_qildim
Created7 November 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/boykot_qildim

Growth

2,5542,5622,5587 August 2026 — 2,562 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,562 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,555 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,554 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,553–2,563 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:252,554-1
10 Aug 2026, 15:512,555-7
7 Aug 2026, 12:302,562no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:002,562first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 43s
Average length
1m 09s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,539 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,06355.3%
😢1,20721.8%
💯4197.56%
🔥3055.51%
2714.89%
1031.86%
🫡741.34%
🤝581.05%
👎180.325%
👌150.271%
🌚60.108%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,539reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2024 to 9 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Oct 2025, 01:47 UTC≈4,210 views189 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Kecha sudga taxminan 50-70 odam keldi. Taxminan yarim qismi sudga qatnasha oldi. Sud adolatsiz va saviyasiz o'tdi. Shahar va Respublika sudlariga apellyatsiya topshirishligini Nurulloh Muhammad aytib o'tdilar. Meni mahzun qilgan narsadan biri: biz befarq bo'lib qoldik. Qatnashuvchilar juda kam. Dunyodan 2 soatimizni ajratolsak bo'ldi edi. Nega 1000 ta odam kelmadi?!. Yoki qo'rqyapmizmi. Ko'rdim, ayol-qizlar, qariy

😢146💯27👍1221🌚1

8 Oct 2025, 09:16 UTC≈3,590 views116 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Turib bering Ko'p eshitaman: "G'azoda shuncha zulm bo'lmoqda, nega musulmon davlatlar jim, nega Turkiya amaliy harakat qilmaydi?" Yaqinda aksar qismi musulmon bo'lmagan Global Sumud flotilyasi nomi ostida 400 dan oshiq inson G'azoga borishga, yordam qilishga harakat qilishdi. Kirisholmagan bo'lishsada bu ishlari yana minglab balki millionlab insonga turtki bo'ldi. Endi yana ham kattaroq jamoa bilan bu ish qaytalana

4624😢21🔥10👍5💯5🫡5

26 Sept 2025, 18:14 UTC≈8,090 views143 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video lavha yig'latdi Bu voqelarga befarq bo'lishlik - hissizlik Do'stimiz "Cola" ichyaptimi demak biz sustmiz. Necha marotaba uni qaytardik? Necha marotaba G'azoga moddiy yordam berdik? Bunga ishonchli fondlar talaygina (1, 2) Tongda g'am bilan turadigan zamondamiz Befarq bo'lmayman. Buni javobi bor! @boykot_qildim

😢121👍9💯832

29 Jul 2025, 19:33 UTC≈15,300 views77 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Sizchi, siz qachon va nima sababga ko’ra yig’ladingiz? Manbaa: @temurbek_adhamov *** Inson sifatida befarq bo'lmasligingizni so'rardim Men @boykot_qildim - boykotqildim.com

😢69🔥511👍1

17 May 2025, 18:34 UTC≈18,800 views246 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Мана террорчи исроилнинг асл башараси. Кола, пепси, фанта, кфс ва бошка маҳсулотлардан нафсини тиёлмай "битта ман билан нима ҳам бўларди” дейдиган мусулмонлар! Мана нималар бўлади, нафсингизни тиймасангиз" ✍️ Murod (feyzbukdan olindi) — Faqat boykot bilan cheklanib qolmang. Bir qancha haqiqatda yordam berayotgan tashkilotlar mavjud. Topib moddiy yordam bering. Esdan chiqarmang. Shu chaqaloqlar o'rniga o'z farz

😢184💯33👍19🔥64

15 Nov 2024, 12:01 UTC≈48,800 views404 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Boykot qilyapsizmi? boykotqildim.com saytini tashkil qilinganiga 1 yildan oshibdi Boykot qilish kerak bo'lgan narsalar juda ko'p. Eng ommaboplarini sizlarga taqdim qildik. Lekin ular biz o'ylagandan ko'proq. Men faqat ishonchli o'zimizni yoki Turkiya mahsulotlarini sotib olishga harakat qilaman doim. Kunlik hayotimda faqat kerakli narsalarni bilib olganman. Imkon boricha men uchun yangi narsalarni olmayman. Bu cho

👍270🔥47🫡39💯25116👌3😢3

5 Nov 2024, 08:07 UTC≈26,700 views223 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

⚠️ Hamma narsa ko‘z o‘ngingizda sodir bo‘lgan edi! Faqat tomoshabin bo‘ldingizmi? O'z farzandimizni shu bolalar o'rniga qoyib tasavvur qilib ko'ring. Qotillik to'xtab qolmadi. Har kuni bolalar o'ldirilyapti. Qanday yordam qilsak bo'ladi. Izlanamiz. Eng kamida moddiy yordam qilamiz Tomoshabin bo‘lmaylik, iltimos! boykotqildim.com

😢173👍3677

15 Aug 2024, 14:09 UTC≈31,100 views388 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔞 Faxsh targ'ibotchilariga boykot Faxsh - bu uyatsiz ish, zino holatlari (qisqa qilganda meni tushuncham) 📹 Bu videoni ko'rgandirsiz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRQWc_47kgE Yo'q bo'lsa ko'ring. ✋ Keling faxshni va yomon odatlarni targ'ib qiluvchilarga baykot qilaylik 🤔 Vaynerlarni qanday qo'llaymiz -> ko'rishlar sonini ko'paytiramiz -> ko'rishlar soni reklama beruvchilarni jalb qiladi -> reklama beruvchilar

👍311💯42🔥2165👌2👎1

26 Jul 2024, 10:24 UTC≈21,300 views203 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔺 AQSh iqtisodiyoti asosi 21-asrda AQSh ishtirok etgan muhim urushlar va nizolar ro'yxati, joy nomlari va yillar oralig'i bilan: 1. Afg'oniston (Afg'oniston urushi) - Yillar: 2001–2021 2. Iroq (Iroq urushi) - Yillar: 2003–2011 3. Pokiston (Dron hujumlari va harbiy operatsiyalar) - Yillar: 2004–hozirgi vaqtga qadar 4. Suriya (Suriya fuqarolar urushi ishtiroki) - Yillar: 2014–hozirgi vaqtga qadar 5. L

😢122👍45🔥15💯85👎4🌚2👌2

25 Jun 2024, 07:50 UTC≈59,800 views422 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🍎 Boykot Apple Men nega Apple (iPhone) kompaniyasini boykot qildim? Sizga 3 ta ko'pchilik biladigan katta sabablarni aytaman ⚠️ Quyida yozganlarimga rasmiy va ishonchli manbaalardan havola keltirib o'tdim! 🔹️️ Birinchi sabab Apple xodimlari Isroil mudofaa kuchlari (Saxal - G'azoda genosid qilayotgan harbiy guruh) uchun hissa qo'shishsa (donate) huddi shuncha qo'shib Saxalga berayotgan ekan Masalan Apple xodimi S

👍310🤝45💯30🔥1714👌3😢2👎1

24 Jun 2024, 17:46 UTC≈17,200 views196 reactionsread 7 August 2026

O'z farzandingiz yoki yaqin qarindoshingizni (jiyanlar) shu chaqaloq o'rniga qo'yib tasavvur qiling! Meni ham farzandim bor, hali 1 yoshga to'lmagan. Chidab bo'lmaydi😖 Bunday videolarni deyarli kanalga yubormaganman. Lekin odamlar yodidan ko'tarilmoqda G'azo holati. Eslatib qo'ydim. Uzr so'rayman. Amerika shu ishlarda asosiy sababchilardan. Qotillik uchun yordam bermoqda. Ertaga Apple haqida maqola chiqaraman insh

😢12330👍16💯16🔥10🌚1

24 Jun 2024, 17:44 UTC≈15,800 views212 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @FalastinVideo

Shimoliy G'azodan yurakni vayron qiluvchi manzaralar: Bir paytlar og'irligi 18 kg bo'lgan sog'lom bola bo'lgan Muhammad, Isroilning davom etayotgan blokadasi tufayli og'ir to'yib ovqatlanmaslik va ocharchilik tufayli atigi 8 kg og'irlikda. Telegram: t.me/FaIastin

😢198👍1111🌚1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @boykot_qildim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 882,659 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Boykot qildim - Isroilga baykot” (@boykot_qildim), 2,554 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boykot_qildim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.