..🖇📊.. -آپدیت «بجهرم» | وقتی ریتم پنهان سهم خودش را نشان میدهد 🔘 مطابق با تحلیلهای قبلی، در بجهرم یک ریتم تکرارشونده را شناسایی کرده بودیم؛ به این صورت که حرکات صعودی و نزولی سهم از نظر شدت حرکت و مدت زمان تقریباً نصف حرکت قبلی تکرار میشدند. 💠 این رفتار را با باکسبندی منظم روی چارت نمایش دادیم تا نظم پنهان حرکات سهم بهتر قابل مشاهده باشد. ☑️ بر همین اساس، در تحلیل قبلی عنوان کردیم که سهم در آخرین باکس فشردگی …

Channel
بورس پژوهش
@boursepazhohesh
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,294subscribers
+440 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001785963498 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @boursepazhohesh |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/boursepazhohesh |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 9,294 | +15 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 9,279 | +55 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 9,224 | +135 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:53 | 9,089 | +6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 9,083 | +38 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 9,045 | +12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 9,033 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 9,036 | +91 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 8,945 | +65 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 8,880 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 8,881 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 8,875 | +19 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 8,856 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 8,854 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:09 | 8,854 | first reading |
Engagement
70 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 27.4%
- avg views ÷ 9,294 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,550
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 70 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 70 (4 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 15,300 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 49s
- Average length
- 49s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
📊 اعلام وضعیت بورس درمورد شاخص کل همیشه سوالات زیادی داریم؛ مقاومت کجاست؟ حمایت کجاست؟ رشد تا کجا ادامه دارد؟ اصلاح بعدی چه زمانی اتفاق میافتد و… رفقا، همانطور که بارها قبلا گفتم ما معمولاً شاخص کل رو به سبک کلاسیک و امواج الیوت تحلیل نمیکنیم. دلیلش هم این هست که شاخص کل برخلاف یک سهم حاصل برآیند تعداد زیادی نماد با وزنها، صنایع و رفتارهای متفاوته و عملکرد چند سهم بزرگ و شاخصساز میتونه تصویر کلی شاخص را به شک…
Sticker, posted without a caption
..🖇📊.. «شفن» | پایان اصلاح ۵ ساله و آغاز جنبش جدید 🔘 الگوی اصلاحی سهم پس از حدود ۵ سال فرسایش به نظر میرسد به پایان خود رسیده و سهم اکنون در ابتدای یک موج جنبشی جدید قرار گرفته است. 📈 در صورت تداوم ساختار فعلی حرکت میانمدت و بلندمدت سهم میتواند مطابق با شماتیک ترسیمی پیش برود. 🎯 هدف اول: بازپسگیری سقف سال ۱۴۰۰ در محدوده ۱۱۰۰ تومان 🔻مقاومت: ۶۶۰ تومان 🔺حمایت: ۵۱۰ تومان #شفن 📆سهشنبه ۰۳ شهریور ۱۴۰۵ 🆔لینک عضو…
🎼«خیابونا» از محسن یگانه
دوباره به همان شهر رسیدم این بار، بیآنکه عزیزی بگوید کجایش بروم. شهر همان شهر است، بعضی چیزها دیگر نه…
..🖇📊.. «قصفها» | در مسیر موج سوم جنبش صعودی 🔘 مطابق با چارت، سهم در یک جنبش صعودی قرار دارد و در حال حاضر در ریزموجهای موج ۳ این جنبش حرکت میکند؛ ساختاری که میتواند در میانمدت و بلندمدت سهم را به سمت اهداف بالاتر هدایت کند. 💠 در چنین ساختارهایی، اصلاحات بخشی طبیعی از مسیر هستند و همانند رفتار یک سال گذشته میتوانند کوتاهمدت و مقطعی باشند؛ در حالی که سهم در ادامه مسیر کفها و سقفهای بالاتری ایجاد میکند. 📈 ش…
Sticker, posted without a caption
..🖇📊.. -تکرار تاریخ در «فاذر» | وقتی گذشته دوباره روی چارت تکرار میشود رفتار سهم در دو برهه زمانی گذشته شباهت قابلتوجهی با یکدیگر دارد و میتوان آن را از منظر تکرار تاریخ بررسی کرد؛ بهگونهای که بسیاری از جزئیات و ریزرفتارهای حرکتی، در حال تکرار شدن هستند. 💠برای اینکه این شباهتها سادهتر و قابلدرکتر باشند، ساختار گذشته و حال را با باکسهای رنگی روی چارت مشخص کردهایم. 📈در حال حاضر نیز انتظار داریم با توجه ب…
Sticker, posted without a caption
انگشتانش هنگام تحلیل خودکار طلا بودند و من کاظم غریب آبادی 🎼گندم گون از چاووشی
رفقای عزیزم سلام❤️ برای چندمین بار لازم دونستم این موضوع رو یادآوری کنم؛ چون اصلاً دوست ندارم خدایی نکرده کسی از طریق کانال ما وارد کانالهای کلاهبرداری بشه و متضرر بشه. 🔴 تبلیغاتی که گاهی پایین پستهای کانال مشاهده میکنید، هیچ ارتباطی با «بورس پژوهش» نداره. تلگرام بهصورت خودکار و اجباری این تبلیغات رو در بعضی کانالها نمایش میده و امکان حذف یا انتخاب محتوای اونها از طرف ما وجود نداره. کانال «بورس پژوهش» هیچو…
Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @boursepazhohesh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kian1one · 52,646
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026
@Navesan_sabz · 34,311
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
@majaleh_bedanim · 136,058
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
@medumalii · 26,249
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
@BoursEsf13 · 23,049
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
@archivecharts · 24,073
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
@BoursarMedia · 31,100
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بورس پژوهش” (@boursepazhohesh), 9,294 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boursepazhohesh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.