Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Bot Maker

@botmaker_channel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,406subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001661115702
TypeChannel
Username@botmaker_channel
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/botmaker_channel

Growth

1,4061,4301,4186 August 2026 — 1,430 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,430 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,429 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,413 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,406 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,402–1,434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:181,406-7
9 Aug 2026, 15:141,413-16
6 Aug 2026, 12:401,429-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:481,430no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:351,430first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 1,406 subscribers
Avg views / post
193
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total2,515
Reactions total125
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC≈46 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В разработке сервис по выводу GRAM в рубли себе на карту. Кто желает потестить - пишите в ЛС, дам доступ к закрытому сервису. Вывод от 13 GRAM. Ну и тестерам накину $SPC / монеты в JUMP в качестве награды 😊

31 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC≈116 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ищу добровольца! 🤔 В разработке интересный сервис. Задача добровольца: получить деньги на карту. Без подводных камней и оплат. Просто получить и сказать, что все ок. UPD: Доброволец найден.

29 Jul 2026, 10:38 UTC≈140 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Дуров снова не дал возможность читать наши переписки в режиме онлайн Павла Дурова снова обвиняют за то, что не удалил бота из тг, который работает в максе и вк👏 Но настолько очевидна нам всем настоящая причина всего этого театра, что мы лучше просто продолжим билдить, не отвлекаясь на всё это. Лично я рад, что тг под запретом 🚀 Есть ощущение, что все что не запрещено, тем лучше не пользоваться.

26 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC≈165 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Жаль парня, но никто не знал, что именно в этот турнир игроки начнут делать результаты, которых никогда не выдавали: новые рекорды и неожиданные участники высоко в ТОП. Чем выше призовые в турнире, тем выше скилл игроков? 🤔 В итоге его скинули с 1 места. Закинул Никите 25к монет в чате космонавтов - за смелость)

25 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC≈159 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

200$ за несколько минут 🔼 Вспомнил про OnlyOptions, заглянул и залил туда 100$ проверить свои трейдерские способности. Потребовалось всего несколько минут и ровно 2 успешные сделки, чтоб сделать +200$ на изменения цены ETH. Я думаю, это особенно подойдет тем, кто пытается заработать в апках тг, вкладывает, ждет полгода и скамится. Здесь хотя бы ждать результат всего несколько минут и от тебя реально что-то зависи

24 Jul 2026, 09:55 UTC≈431 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Кто этот парень на первом месте? Не помню когда последний раз набирали больше 630. Скин пулеметчика сделал свое дело - на первом месте тот, кто никогда там не был. Он взял защиту от снайперов, и теперь никто не сможет купить его место. 🤔 Интересно складывается Граммовый Турнир #2! А лидеры прошлых турниров вообще способны его догнать?

23 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC≈139 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😊 Но я хочу понаблюдать как сейчас работает игра, а именно как она обернется для снайпера Никиты. Он не стал собирать монеты, ускорив процесс. Вот этот парень купил первое место за 17$ (в ⭐️), и сейчас он на первом месте с потенциальной наградой 100$ в GRAM.

22 Jul 2026, 20:00 UTC≈138 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Чуть меньше 4 дней до завершения турнира в JUMP, не мог не купить за 41к монет результат 594 очка (3 место). 🎯 Напомню: в JUMP можно накопить монеты прямо в игре, а потом купить уже готовый результат другого игрока через Режим снайпера. Именно эта механика уже полтора года помогает многим игрокам занимать призовые места и зарабатывать💰 Вероятно, меня скинут, но в ТОП-15 или 10 оказаться могу 😀

16 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC≈166 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🆕 Адреса-копилки в OnlyUSDT ⚡️ В меню 🛠 Услуги → 🔒 Адреса-копилки появилась механика, которая решает одну из главных проблем любого криптана: как заставить себя не тратить то, что отложил. 🔒 Что такое адрес-копилка? Бот создает тебе отдельный USDT-адрес (TRC-20) и ты устанавливаешь цель: 💰 По сумме — копишь до конкретной цифры (от 10 USDT) ⏳ По сроку — блокируешь средства на определённое время (от 3 до 365 дней)

15 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC≈116 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤟 500 GRAM в SunSpace JUMP Граммовый Турнир #2 начался! Играй - набирай результат - зарабатывай. 🏆 Призовые 500 $GRAM (~800$) разделят топ-500 лучших игроков. 😀 Настоящий GameFi, а не вот эти скам-вайбкодерские апки от непонятных инфлюенсеров. 🔫 Прикупил еще 2000 GRAM для будущих турниров

15 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC≈135 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

💲 Плачу 30$ человеку, кто пройдет вериф на CryptoBot Условия: 18+, ранее не проходил вериф на криптоботе Пиши ➡️ @botmaker ‼️ Неактуально

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @botmaker_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 243,374 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bot Maker” (@botmaker_channel), 1,406 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/botmaker_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.