Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

💥 Переходник 🔥

@borzeus

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

133subscribers

-19,502 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003000744758
TypeChannel
Usernames@borzeus @zeus_devs
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/borzeus

Growth

13319,6359,8847 August 2026 — 19,635 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,610 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,571 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,541 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,513 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,462 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,444 subscribers14 August 2026 — 133 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -19,502. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:28133-19,311
13 Aug 2026, 03:1619,444-18
12 Aug 2026, 16:4319,462-51
11 Aug 2026, 13:5819,513-28
10 Aug 2026, 10:3219,541-30
9 Aug 2026, 11:5119,571-39
8 Aug 2026, 14:0619,610-25
7 Aug 2026, 17:0219,635first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
764.9%
avg views ÷ 133 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.684%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 December 20258 August 2026)
Views total7,121
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

419 reactions across 18 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11327.0%
🔥9923.6%
👍6615.8%
5212.4%
❤‍🔥296.92%
💯133.10%
👨‍💻71.67%
🤝71.67%
🏆61.43%
🙏51.19%
🤡51.19%
👎40.955%
💩40.955%
👌30.716%
👏20.477%
🤨20.477%
🌚10.239%
🥰10.239%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 419reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,187
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 20 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
1,060
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @borzeus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 December 2025 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC538 viewsread 13 August 2026

Все кто оставлял заявки на вакансию в бот, в ближайшее время с вами свяжется моя ассистентка, как отберет интересующих для нас кандидатов и проведет первичное собеседование, кто не успел отправить заявку, самое время.

4 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC974 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Со времён раздевалки — снимаю шляпу 😁 Дипфейки развиваются быстрее, чем общество успевает к ним привыкнуть. И самое страшное даже не поддельные ролики со знаменитостями, а то, что через пару лет любой человек сможет сказать: «Это не я, это нейронка». Мы идём в мир, где ни видео, ни голосу, ни фотографии нельзя будет верить без подтверждения. Технологию уже не остановить, поэтому единственная защита — критическое мы

1

4 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC780 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Вайбкодинг сейчас — уже не отдельное направление, а обычная часть работы любого программиста. Почти никто не пишет всё руками с нуля. Важно не просто попросить ИИ что-то собрать, а понимать, что происходит внутри, уметь проверить код и контролировать результат. Мои проекты, конечно, тоже написаны не без Codex 😁 Но рынок уже переполнен тысячами вайбкоденных SaaS-продуктов. Накидать какой-нибудь сервис сейчас можно д

1

4 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC699 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026

вайбик на поболтать появился у меня, можете накидать вопросов которые вам интересны, нашел первый попавшийся бот 👇 t.me/voprosy?start=se5ivrs

2 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC≈1,120 views5 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026

Posted without readable text

2🔥2💯1

31 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC≈1,340 views19 reactions12 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

Pixly Кринжа навалю ладно?

95🔥5

29 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,670 views19 reactions50 Starsread 13 August 2026

В связи с последними новостями, мы тут все экстремисты и террористы оказывается 😄

💯9🤝5👌3👏2

11 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC≈2,290 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

💰 Проекты должны зарабатывать Вчера владельцы крупных маркетплейсов Telegram-подарков объединились и решили ввести комиссии за сделки. На мой взгляд, это логичный шаг. Проекты должны зарабатывать, иначе рано или поздно они просто перестанут развиваться. Да, не все участники рынка поддержали решение, но сам подход правильный. Похожая проблема давно есть и на рынке ИИ-генераторов. Борьба за креаторов уже дошла до а

72🤝1🙏1

11 Jul 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,750 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Если вы хотели создать своего бота в системе AiGram x Pixly - самое время, данная возможность скоро будет отключена и все реф ссылки будут ссылаться на официальный бот.

3🤝1🙏1

3 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC≈2,310 views14 reactions1,060 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

🔥 Глобальный апдейт AiGram x Pixly Последние недели мы практически 24/7 работаем над самым крупным обновлением проекта, и сейчас могу сказать одно — готовность уже 98%. 🚀 Это уже давно не просто очередной апдейт с новыми нейронками. Мы превращаем AiGram x Pixly из обычного веба с ИИ в полноценную социальную сеть для создания и потребления AI-контента. После релиза вас также ждут новый сайт и приложения во всех поп

👍6💯3🙏32

12 May 2026, 17:01 UTC≈4,120 views9 reactions5 Starsread 13 August 2026

Вакансия: Менеджер по работе с Instagram-блогерами: Ищем менеджера для поиска и подключения Instagram-блогеров к нашей нейросети @pixly Что нужно делать: 🟠искать блогеров в Instagram выходить на контакт 🟠подключать к партнерской программе 🟠сопровождать блогеров на старте Условия: 🟠ставка + % процент от подключенных блогеров 🟠удаленная работа 🟠обучение и материалы 🟠испытательный срок Что важно: 🟠опыт работы с блог

5🤡4

26 Feb 2026, 10:38 UTC≈8,320 views29 reactions45 Starsread 13 August 2026

Последнее время внимательно наблюдаю за рынком подарков и вижу, как активно китайские инвесторы откупают Plush Pepe. Ещё под Новый год хотел взять себе одного — тогда цены начинались примерно от 550 000 ₽. Прошло всего два месяца, и цена выросла почти вдвое 👀 В итоге — спонтанное решение + выгодное предложение, и я приобрёл свою первую Plush Pepe 🧸🐸 Вот она: 👉 https://t.me/nft/PlushPepe-284 🎉 А теперь приятный бон

11🔥10👨‍💻7🌚1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @borzeus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@borzeus edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 550,509 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💥 Переходник 🔥” (@borzeus), 133 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/borzeus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.