Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🔔زنگ عربی «ولی برجی»

@borjiarabi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,606subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001119702610
TypeChannel
Username@borjiarabi
CreatedBetween 1 March 2017 and 30 November 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/borjiarabi

Growth

2,6062,6182,6126 August 2026 — 2,618 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,618 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,614 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,606 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,604–2,620 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 15:412,606-8
8 Aug 2026, 23:382,614-4
6 Aug 2026, 05:202,618no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:372,618first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.5%
avg views ÷ 2,606 subscribers
Avg views / post
820
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held20 (15 July 202621 July 2026)
Views total11,485
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC608 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

▪️ دوازدهمی های انسانی؛ سطح سؤالات نهایی عربی (امروز ۳۰ تیر ۱۴۰۵) چطور بود؟

  1. دشوار بود18%
  2. متوسط بالا بود12%
  3. متوسط بود16%
  4. آسان بود9%
  5. دوازدهمی نیستم، می خواهم نتیجه را ببینم48%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC608 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

▪️دوازدهمی های تجربی و ریاضی؛ سطح سؤالات نهایی عربی (امروز ۳۰ تیر ۱۴۰۵) چطور بود؟

  1. دشوار بود24%
  2. متوسط بالا بود21%
  3. متوسط بود6%
  4. آسان بود7%
  5. دوازدهمی نیستم، می خواهم نتیجه را ببینم44%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

🎯 آزمون ۲ شبیه ساز نهایی (تالیفی) پایه دوازدهم تجربی و ریاضی ▫️با پاسخنامه کاملا تشریحی ✍️طراحان: گروه عربی مزرعه دانش: ▪️استاد ولی برجی ▪️استاد روح الله اصغری ▪️دکتر نعمت الله مقصودی •••••••••••••••••• 🔔زنگ عربی/ برجی👇 @borjiarabi

20 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

▪️پاسخنامه شبه نهایی دوازدهم تجربی و ریاضی ▫️ویژه بچه های آلفا ✍️طراح: مهران ترکمان ••••••••••••••••••••••• 🔔زنگ عربی/برجی👇 @borjiarabi

20 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

▪️آزمون شبه نهایی دوازدهم تجربی و ریاضی ▫️ویژه بچه های آلفا ✍️طراح: مهران ترکمان ••••••••••••••••••••••• 🔔زنگ عربی/برجی👇 @borjiarabi

20 Jul 2026, 05:54 UTC847 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

▪️ یازدهمی های انسانی عزیز؛ امتحان عربی امروز چطور بود؟

  1. دشوار بود13%
  2. متوسط بالا بود12%
  3. متوسط بود12%
  4. ساده بود9%
  5. یازدهم انسانی نیستم می خواهم نتیحه را ببینم56%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Jul 2026, 05:53 UTC784 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

▪️یازدهمی های تجربی و ریاضی عزیز؛ امتحان عربی امروز چطور بود؟

  1. دشوار بود15%
  2. متوسط بالا بود20%
  3. متوسط بود13%
  4. ساده بود8%
  5. یازدهمی نیستم می خوام نتیجه رو ببینم47%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 7 August 2026

📣📣هشدار به یازدهمی ها و دوازدهمی های علاقمند به فوتبال! ▪️امشب ساعت ۲۲.۳۰ (یکشنبه ۲۸ تیر ۱۴۰۵) مسابقه فینال جام جهانی بین اسپانیا و آرژانتین برگزار خواهد شد. فینال جام جهانی معمولا می تواند حدود ۳ ساعت از وقت هر علاقمند به فوتبالی را بگیرد. ۹۰ دقیقه بازی (بدون وقت اضافه و وقت تلف شده) و نیم ساعت مراسم و برنامه های بین بازی و مقدمات قبل بازی و مراسمات اهدای جوایز و جام قهرمانی پس از بازی، تایم بلندی را به خود اختصا

18 Jul 2026, 11:38 UTC617 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

🔔آزمون مفهومی عربی یازدهم تجربی و ریاضی 🔹خرداد ماه ✍️طراح: ولی برجی •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 🔔زنگ عربی/ برجی👇 @borjiarabi

18 Jul 2026, 11:37 UTC584 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

🔔آزمون مفهومی عربی یازدهم انسانی 🔹خرداد ماه ✍️طراح: ولی برجی •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 🔔زنگ عربی/ برجی👇 @borjiarabi

16 Jul 2026, 19:36 UTC925 viewsread 7 August 2026

▪️اصلاح مصوبه ترمیم سوابق تحصیلی ابلاغ شد دبیرکل شورای عالی آموزش و پرورش: ▫️اصلاح ماده ۳ مصوبه نحوه ترمیم سوابق تحصیلی پس از تصویب در شورای عالی آموزش و پرورش و تأیید رئیس‌جمهور، برای اجرا به وزارت آموزش و پرورش ابلاغ شد. 🔹براساس این اصلاحیه، از سال تحصیلی ۱۴۰۵-۱۴۰۴ داوطلبان برای نخستین بار می‌توانند نمرات آزمون‌های نهایی را به‌صورت تک‌درس یا تمامی دروس یک پایه ترمیم کنند؛ موضوعی که نسبت به مقررات گذشته، انعطاف

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @borjiarabi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTCAnonymous Poll204 voters

▪️ دوازدهمی های انسانی؛ سطح سؤالات نهایی عربی (امروز ۳۰ تیر ۱۴۰۵) چطور بود؟

  1. دشوار بود18%
  2. متوسط بالا بود12%
  3. متوسط بود16%
  4. آسان بود9%
  5. دوازدهمی نیستم، می خواهم نتیجه را ببینم48%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTCAnonymous Poll214 voters

▪️دوازدهمی های تجربی و ریاضی؛ سطح سؤالات نهایی عربی (امروز ۳۰ تیر ۱۴۰۵) چطور بود؟

  1. دشوار بود24%
  2. متوسط بالا بود21%
  3. متوسط بود6%
  4. آسان بود7%
  5. دوازدهمی نیستم، می خواهم نتیجه را ببینم44%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Jul 2026, 05:54 UTCAnonymous Poll198 voters

▪️ یازدهمی های انسانی عزیز؛ امتحان عربی امروز چطور بود؟

  1. دشوار بود13%
  2. متوسط بالا بود12%
  3. متوسط بود12%
  4. ساده بود9%
  5. یازدهم انسانی نیستم می خواهم نتیحه را ببینم56%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Jul 2026, 05:53 UTCAnonymous Poll238 voters

▪️یازدهمی های تجربی و ریاضی عزیز؛ امتحان عربی امروز چطور بود؟

  1. دشوار بود15%
  2. متوسط بالا بود20%
  3. متوسط بود13%
  4. ساده بود8%
  5. یازدهمی نیستم می خوام نتیجه رو ببینم47%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Jul 2026, 11:55 UTCAnonymous Poll216 voters

⚽️طرفدار کدام تیم هستید؟

  1. 🇪🇸اسپانیا48%
  2. 🇦🇷آرژانتین40%
  3. 📊دیدن نتیجه17%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTCAnonymous Poll195 voters

⚽️کدام تیم قهرمان جام جهانی می شود؟

  1. 🇪🇸اسپانیا51%
  2. 🇦🇷آرژانتین43%
  3. 📊دیدن نتیجه13%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 21 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 318,101 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔔زنگ عربی «ولی برجی»” (@borjiarabi), 2,606 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/borjiarabi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.