Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ты моë тепло 🎀

Channel

Ты моë тепло 🎀

@bopovaqwr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

293subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003579792730
TypeChannel
Username@bopovaqwr
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bopovaqwr

Growth

2892932918 August 2026 — 289 subscribers8 August 2026 — 289 subscribers14 August 2026 — 293 subscribers8 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 288–294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:26293+4
8 Aug 2026, 08:18289no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:20289first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.6%
avg views ÷ 293 subscribers
Avg views / post
172
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,920
Reactions total103
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4240.8%
😢1110.7%
💋98.74%
❤‍🔥87.77%
🍓76.80%
💩54.85%
👍43.88%
🔥43.88%
🤡43.88%
👎32.91%
🤮32.91%
🥰32.91%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 04:41 UTC73 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

я часто думаю о том, как люди появляются рядом именно тогда, когда внутри становится пусто. будто кто то сверху понимает, что человеку нужна поддержка, и отправляет кого то, кто сможет тихо держать за руку. так ты появилась у меня. не громко, не ярко, а очень спокойно. и эта спокойность стала тем, что я чувствую каждый день. я не знаю, что ждёт дальше, но знаю, что хочу идти туда с тобой..

1🍓1

5 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC106 viewsread 8 August 2026

«имя», знаю, что сейчас тебе, наверное, не до разговоров, и я прекрасно понимаю почему. мое сердце буквально сжимается от боли, когда я думаю о том, через что ты сейчас проходишь. я хотел бы быть рядом и обнять тебя так крепко, чтобы ты почувствовала, что ты не одна, что кто то разделяет твою боль, пусть даже не может забрать ее полностью. мне так тяжело смотреть, как ты мучаешься из за «имя». я знаю, как сильно ты е

3 Aug 2026, 01:07 UTC157 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Нет актива, нет постов

😢11🤡3👎2💩2❤‍🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 01:05 UTC150 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

от всей души поздравляю тебя с этим важным, долгожданным и невероятно торжественным днем, твоим выпускным из института мвд! сегодня ты официально выпускаешься и становишься лейтенантом, и я даже если честно не могу передать словами, насколько сильно я тобой горжусь. за этими новенькими погонами и красивой формой стоят целых четыре года невероятно тяжелого труда, строгой дисциплины, дежурств, ранних подъемов и постоян

5💋2🔥2❤‍🔥1🍓1

3 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC129 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дорогая, любимая Карина Александровна! Хочу сказать вам огромное, искреннее спасибо за нашу смену «Наши гости 3». Я могу с абсолютной уверенностью сказать, что без вас эта смена была бы совершенно не той. Вы сделали её особенной, живой, наполненной невероятным теплом, светом и уютом. Благодаря вам каждый день был ярким событием, а лагерь стал местом, где дышалось легко и свободно. Вы подарили мне такое огромное кол

6❤‍🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC163 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

котеночек мой, сегодня очень важный день для нас, потому что мы теперь вместе, и у меня сейчас очень тепло на душе. честно говоря, я сама не заметила, как так быстро и сильно тебя полюбила, ты за всё это время стал для меня реально самым близким и важным человеком, без которого я уже просто не представляю каждый свой день. ты правда самый лучший парень, и я безумно ценю то, как ты ко мне относишься и всё то, что ты д

🍓53❤‍🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC154 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

мне всегда было интересно, что первым бросается в глаза в моей внешности..

3

1 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC169 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Триста добьем

👍43💩3🤮3💋2👎1🔥1🤡1

1 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC186 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Родной мой, я вижу, как тебе сейчас тяжело. Я вижу, через какую темноту и глухую стену тебе приходится пробираться каждый день, и как сильно ты устал. Я не буду говорить тебе банальные слова вроде "все пройдет" или "держись". Я просто хочу, чтобы ты знал: я рядом. Ты не один в этой темноте. Тебе не нужно притворяться сильным со мной, не нужно надевать маску, что у тебя всё в порядке, если это не так. Ты можешь быть

2❤‍🔥2💋2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bopovaqwr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 923,468 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ты моë тепло 🎀” (@bopovaqwr), 293 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bopovaqwr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.