Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 55 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 415–425 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Oct 2026, 04:57
416
-2
27 Sept 2026, 08:57
418
-2
13 Sept 2026, 02:39
420
-1
28 Aug 2026, 08:43
421
-1
21 Aug 2026, 12:48
422
-2
12 Aug 2026, 20:01
424
no change
12 Aug 2026, 19:48
424
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 8 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 23s
Average length
2m 23s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
205 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
109
53.2%
👍
33
16.1%
🔥
31
15.1%
💯
10
4.88%
❤🔥
9
4.39%
🤯
5
2.44%
😍
3
1.46%
⚡
1
0.488%
🏆
1
0.488%
😁
1
0.488%
🙏
1
0.488%
🤣
1
0.488%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 205 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2026 to 23 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Новые изменения для бизнеса - о чем говорили на Петербургском налоговом форуме
Разберу ключевые моменты.
1️⃣АвтоУСН — серьёзное ужесточение лимитов
Сейчас лимит — 60 млн рублей.
Обсуждают:
— для 2026 года — 20 млн
— для 2027 года — уже 15 млн
То есть если бизнес в 2026 году зарабатывает больше 20 млн — в 2027 он вылетает с режима со всеми вытекающими (в т.ч. станут плательщиками НДС)
Интересный момент:
В самом з…
Налоговый контроль начинается с отчетности 😎
Итак, отчетная кампания в самом разгаре и мы сейчас активно проверяем данные, прежде, чем сдать в налоговую, потому что налоговый контроль начинается не с выездной проверки. Он начинается со сданной отчетности.
И если в ней есть несостыковки — дальше начинается то самое «взаимодействие» с налоговым органом:
пояснения, требования, комиссии.
А оно вам надо?
Думаю, что не…
Давненько я тут ничего не писала.
И на это есть вполне объективные причины.
Похоже, год лошади действительно решил оправдать своё название — после январских праздников как поскакали… У вас тоже так?!)
В понедельник я вернулась из двухнедельной командировки из Владивостока. И это были не «рабочие поездки с видом на океан», а по-настоящему сумасшедшие дни: утром — работа с клиентами по Владивостоку, вечером — уже по …
Гениальное решение, которое всё испортило или как делать не надо…
Расскажу одну историю.
Компания. Обычная торговля. Работают на УСН, обороты растут — всё классно.
И вот в какой-то момент собственник видит цифры и понимает:
ещё чуть-чуть — и упираемся в лимит по выручке.
Сидят, думают.
И тут рождается гениальная идея 💡
Прямо из серии «ну а что тут сложного?».
👉 Увольняем менеджера по продажам.
👉 Быстро открывае…
Я тут поймала себя на странной мысли.
У меня давно нет кошелька.
Вообще. Карты, телефон — и вперёд.
Но новости января (про рекордное снятие наличных денег) и ситуации в городе интересные:
— мелкие магазины: «терминал не работает» (конечно же 😏)
— в салонах: «наличкой будет дешевле»
— знакомые между делом: «ну наличка сейчас… надёжнее»
И я впервые за долгое время подумала:
а не завести ли мне снова кошелёк и не сня…
Январь ещё никогда не был таким сумасшедшим
Обычно после праздников бизнес «раскачивается»:
кто-то возвращается в режим, кто-то доживает на автомате до февраля.
Кроме бухгалтеров, конечно — у них всегда «сразу в бой»
Но в этом году всё иначе.
Первый рабочий день начался с требований.
А к концу первой рабочей недели:
— по одной компании — решение о выездной 🤯,
— по другим — такой характер требований, что интуиция …
Многие ждали: чем в итоге закончится история с “Машенькой”?
Ситуацию уже разбирают на федеральном уровне.
И вроде бы даже признают:
— есть нестыковки,
— бизнес не смог адаптироваться,
— что-то пошло не так.
А дальше — какие-то точечные, не проверенные решения:
👉 поменяйте ОКВЭД
👉 поднимите зарплаты
👉 перестройте бизнес-модель
И здесь у меня вопрос:
а вы вообще смотрели, могут ли компании и рынок в целом это вытян…
❤10👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @boos_consult. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🟠 Стал(а) чаще держать наличные «на всякий случай»29%
🔴 Да, снимаю и использую регулярно15%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2026 to 23 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Налоги и спокойствие с Боос Евгенией” (@boos_consult), 416 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/boos_consult.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.