Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Book

Channel

Book

@booksonhershelf

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002221296709
TypeChannel
Username@booksonhershelf
Created1 September 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/booksonhershelf

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2729287 August 2026 — 29 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28 subscribers8 September 2026 — 27 subscribers30 September 2026 — 28 subscribers7 August 202630 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 54 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27–29 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Sept 2026, 20:5828+1
8 Sept 2026, 12:3827-1
16 Aug 2026, 16:3628-1
11 Aug 2026, 05:0229no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:4529first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 1 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4693.9%
⚡12.04%
🌚12.04%
🤝12.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2024 to 31 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Mar 2025, 17:26 UTC305 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @yekbarazan

هميشه به انتهاى گريه كه مى رسم صداى ساده ى فروغ از نهايت شب را مى شنوم صداى غروب غزال ها را صداى بوق بوق نبودن تو را در تلفن آرام تر كه شدم شعرى از دفاتر دريا مى خوانم و به انعكاس صدايم در آيينه اتاق خيره مى شوم در برودت اين همه حيرت كجا مانده اى آخر؟ @yekbarazan

❤1

25 Mar 2025, 21:21 UTC320 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @yekbarazan

ما هر دو با تبسم خورشيد زنده ايم. ما عاشقان نور و بهار و پرنده ايم. @yekbarazan

10 Mar 2025, 04:29 UTC356 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @yekbarazan

حيف نيست بهار از سر اتفاق بغلتد در دستم و تو نباشى؟ @yekbarazan

3 Mar 2025, 13:31 UTC359 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @yekbarazan

نمى توانستم ديگر نمى توانستم صداى پايم از انكار راه بر مى خاست و ياسم از صبورى روحم وسيع تر شده بود و آن بهار، و آن وهم سبزرنگ كه بر دريچه گذر داشت، با دلم مى گفت نگاه كن تو هيچ گاه پيش نرفتى تو فرو رفتى @yekbarazan

❤5

1 Mar 2025, 15:30 UTC337 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @yekbarazan

بیا و مرا ببر دیگر نه آفتاب گُر گرفته زبانم را روشن می کند نه بال‌بال شب پره ای جانم را می شکافد و نه شبنمی در قلبم آب می شود بیا دستم را بگیر و خرده ریز این کلمات تباه شده را از پیشم جمع کن ... @yekbarazan

❤5

17 Feb 2025, 15:50 UTC376 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026

تو نور بودى مى ديدمت اما نمى توانستم لمست كنم از من عبور مى كردى پنجره اى بودم پنجره اى بيهوده بر ديوار خرابه اى كه هرگز كسى نفهميد به كدام طرفش نگاه مى كند؟

❤10🌚1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @booksonhershelf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Book” (@booksonhershelf), 28 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/booksonhershelf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.