Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Читательский уголок

Channel

Читательский уголок

@books_md

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

650subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002141757957
TypeChannel
Username@books_md
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/books_md

Growth

648651649.57 August 2026 — 651 subscribers8 August 2026 — 651 subscribers14 August 2026 — 648 subscribers22 August 2026 — 650 subscribers6507 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 648–651 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 23:45650+2
14 Aug 2026, 23:23648-3
8 Aug 2026, 02:46651no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:05651first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.2%
avg views ÷ 650 subscribers
Avg views / post
164
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
46.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total654
Reactions total306
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,392 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
53038.1%
custom 547010389188020966027920.0%
custom 546547156349304171615511.1%
🔥1248.91%
👍543.88%
custom 5465466551266209374523.74%
❤‍🔥312.23%
😢312.23%
custom 5470024928906470244271.94%
🥰201.44%
💯191.36%
😁181.29%
💔171.22%
😍161.15%
👀130.934%
🏆20.144%
😱20.144%
🕊10.072%
🤣10.072%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,392reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 20 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @books_md. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC139 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Книжный клуб оценил книгу Куда приводят мечты на 4,8 из 10 🌚 #оценка_клуба

custom 54701038918802096602119😢16👀7🕊1

4 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC160 views68 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Книга месяца на август — «Яма» Александра Куприна. Это один из самых известных романов Куприна и, пожалуй, самый обсуждаемый. В центре сюжета жизнь публичного дома, но книга совсем не про попытку шокировать читателя. Через эту историю Куприн показывает общество начала XX века, его лицемерие, двойные стандарты и отношение к женщине. Интересно, что перед написанием романа Куприн много общался с людьми, связанными с

28custom 547010389188020966023🔥15❤‍🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC172 views94 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мне кажется это моя лучшая покупка книги за последнее время, там внутри есть ещё цветные картинки, бумага хорошего качества и вообще очень красивая книжка 🥹

34🔥26🥰20custom 546547156349304171610😱2custom 54701038918802096602

2 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC183 views80 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рецензия на книгу «Мой любимый Sputnik» от @k_kivik Не секрет, что Мураками сейчас один из моих самых любимых авторов. И точно самый любимый среди современных. Иногда я сама задумываюсь, чем именно он меня так цепляет. Ведь далеко не все его книги я оцениваю на пять из пяти. На данный момент я прочитала уже двенадцать его книг и планирую со временем прочитать всё, что смогу найти. И недавно я поймала себя на одной

32custom 546546655126620937423custom 547010389188020966020👍3🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTC238 views77 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рецензия на роман Анатолия Кузнецова «Бабий Яр» от @Yasnovidyashii После прочтения серии книг «Голоса Утопии» Светланы Алексиевич и нескольких романов Алеся Адамовича меня уже сложно удивить или тем более шокировать какими-то подробностями, связанными с войной (и не связанными тоже) и человеческой жестокостью. Однако я все равно продолжаю регулярно читать такие книги. Зачем? Наверное, чтобы не забывать, в каком мире

36custom 546547156349304171624custom 547010389188020966017

23 Jul 2026, 10:08 UTC409 views78 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

И тогда я поняла. Всю дорогу мы казались замечательными попутчиками, хотя были всего лишь одинокими металлическими болванками, и каждая описывала круги по собственной орбите. Издалека они смотрятся прекрасными падающими звездами. А на самом деле там — мы, запертые поодиночке, как преступники, внутри этих железок, и летим неизвестно куда. Если случайно орбиты двух спутников совпадают, тогда мы и встречаемся. И соприко

32💔17😢15custom 54654665512662093747custom 54654715634930417164🔥3

22 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC409 views79 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рецензия от @maruseaaa «Мудрость чая» Норико Моришиты: как заваривание чая учит терпению Есть книги, которые я читаю быстро, чтобы поскорее узнать, чем всё закончится. А есть те, что сопротивляются спешке - и «Мудрость чая» как раз таковой и является. Я не сразу поняла, как к ней подступиться: сюжета здесь в привычном смысле нет, а есть двадцать пять лет, которые героиня провела на уроках чайной церемонии, заучивая

37custom 547010389188020966023custom 546547156349304171615❤‍🔥4

6 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC440 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На всякий случай : Если у кого-то есть второй том этой книги ⤴️ или может быть кто-то планирует поездку в Россию в скором времени и есть возможность купить ее, пожалуйста дайте знать 🙏

1

3 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC517 views85 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Купила Братьев Карамазовых, нашу книгу сезона, к сожалению только первую часть, вторую заказывала отдельно и будет уже в августе 😭💔

32custom 547010389188020966026custom 547002492890647024421🔥6

2 Jul 2026, 10:03 UTC465 views67 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Прочитанное за июнь. Если бы не Миллиган, то месяц можно было бы назвать удачным 🌚🌚 А вы что читали в июне?

29👍17custom 546547156349304171615custom 54701038918802096605🤣1

30 Jun 2026, 08:10 UTC478 views87 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Книжный клуб оценил книгу Цирцея на 8,6 из 10 Эта книга была юбилейной. Встреча по ней совпала с днем рождения клуба. Уже 2 года мы читаем книжки и обсуждаем их, прочитали вместе уже 28 книг. Книга многим понравилась, вообще из всех присутствующих книгу оценил на 6 только один человек. Если сравнивать с последними книгами в клубе, то эта книга была глотком свежего воздуха 😁 #оценка_клуба

35custom 547010389188020966023custom 546547156349304171620🔥6custom 54654665512662093743

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @books_md. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 712,082 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Психология саморазвитие
@Psihologiya_samorazvitie · 50,707
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Кишинёв INFO 🇲🇩 НОВОСТИ
@chisinau_info1 · 43,776
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Читательский уголок” (@books_md), 650 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/books_md.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.