Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BOOKS_FOR_WOMEN

Channel

BOOKS_FOR_WOMEN

@books_for_women_t

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,299subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001687106873
TypeChannel
Username@books_for_women_t
Created24 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/books_for_women_t

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2961,3031,299.56 August 2026 — 1,298 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,298 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,297 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,299 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,303 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,302 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,298 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,296 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,299 subscribers1,2996 August 20268 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 33 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,295–1,304 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 04:161,299+3
3 Sept 2026, 10:251,296-2
30 Aug 2026, 21:051,298-4
18 Aug 2026, 21:041,302-1
15 Aug 2026, 19:441,303+4
12 Aug 2026, 01:321,299+2
9 Aug 2026, 07:541,297-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:511,298no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:191,298first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

162 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7546.3%
❤5735.2%
👍2113.0%
🥰53.09%
🎉31.85%
😁10.617%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC89 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

КНИЖНЫЙ АНОНС ⏰ 📖 Стив Кавана «Два типа незнакомцев» Элли Паркер прославилась в интернете тем, что периодически делала добрые дела – спонтанно и на глазах у подписчиков. Ее жизнь казалась им идеальной, пока Элли не предал муж с ее лучшей подругой. Красивый фасад рухнул, но миллионы людей продолжили наблюдать: кто-то сочувствовал, кто-то ждал нового падения. Однажды Элли встречает в метро незнакомца на костылях и с …

🔥9👍1

5 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC180 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я испытываю искреннее уважение к этим несгибаемым людям 👏 Представляете, если бы они сдались? Даже, если забыть про Гарри Поттера - что могло не понравится в Унесенных ветром и Кэрри??? Вы бы на каком отказе сдались?

👍7🔥5

5 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC186 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Держите два трекера на сто книг 😁 У кого какие планы на год? Хотите сделаю такой трекер под ваше число?

🔥8

4 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC221 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

КНИЖНЫЙ ТЕСТ ⏰ Давайте поиграем 😁 Читаете правила на первом слайде, считаете галочки на втором и получаете результат на третьем. И оказывается… Я, например, коллекционер красивых обложек 😂 А казалось бы 🧐 А у вас какой результат? Есть хоть кто-то близкий к бессмертным? 😁

🔥8❤6

4 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC222 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ЛУЧШИЕ ДЕТЕКТИВЫ первой половины 2026 года 📚 📖 🕵🏻 Саймон Бекетт «Химия смерти» (вся серия) 📖 🧚🏻‍♀️ Татьяна Дыбовская «Копия неверна» 📖 🕵🏻 Кейт Латимер «Пропавшая книга Шелторпов» 📖 🕵🏻 ☕️ Джуно Блэк «Забытые кости в Тенистой Лощине» (вся серия) 📖 🕵🏻 Елена Михалкова «Колодец и бабочка» 📖 🕵🏻 Роберт Гэлбрейт «The Hallmarked Man» (вся серия) 📖 🕵🏻 Елена Михалкова «Перо бумажной птицы» 📖 🕵🏻 Рэнни Эрт «Река тьмы» (вся серия…

🔥14👍2❤1

3 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC224 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

КНИЖНЫЕ ИТОГИ ИЮЛЯ ☀️ Прочитано 24 книги 4/5 📖 🌳 Энтони Троллоп «Вот так мы теперь живем» 4/5 📖 Алексей Осадчук «Излом» 4/5 📖 Кэти Мари Уэйланд «Архитектура сюжета» 4/5 📖 Горбов, Бачурова «Человек государев» (книга 3) 4/5 📖 Андрей Стоев «За последним порогом» (13 книг) 4/5 📖 Снайдер Блейк «Спасите котика» 🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺 3.5/5 📖 Андрей Волковский «Убийство в ритуальном зале» 3.5/5 📖 Мари Бенедикт «Королевы детектива…

🔥9👍1

3 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC241 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Если кому-то нужен план на август 😁

🔥10❤4

2 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC251 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Небольшой подарок вам ❤️

🥰4

2 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC266 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, сегодня - день книжной закладки 🔖 А какая у вас была самая странная закладка? У меня, мне кажется, было все 😁 От фишек казино до другой книги 📕 А у вас?

👍5❤1

2 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC241 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Какой у вас получился результат? 😁

❤6🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @books_for_women_t. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Книжный Вестник
@duosoft_books · 120,035
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026
у меня дома | in_myhome
@in_myhome · 35,251
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BOOKS_FOR_WOMEN” (@books_for_women_t), 1,299 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/books_for_women_t.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.