Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CUET Books PYQs

Channel

CUET Books PYQs

@books_cuet

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,613subscribers

-266 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001583478914
TypeChannel
Username@books_cuet
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/books_cuet

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,6136,8796,7467 August 2026 — 6,879 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,872 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,865 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,852 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,848 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,839 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,826 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,817 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,817 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,802 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,795 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,750 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,736 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,727 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,717 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,686 subscribers10 October 2026 — 6,672 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,651 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,641 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,635 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,638 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,629 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,630 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,625 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,613 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 89 days, net -266. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,573–6,919 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 00:316,613-12
2 Nov 2026, 03:476,625-5
29 Oct 2026, 20:016,630+1
26 Oct 2026, 15:366,629-9
23 Oct 2026, 21:196,638+3
20 Oct 2026, 22:566,635-6
17 Oct 2026, 11:376,641-10
14 Oct 2026, 17:186,651-21
10 Oct 2026, 22:366,672-14
4 Oct 2026, 20:186,686-31
25 Sept 2026, 14:176,717-10
16 Sept 2026, 16:196,727-9
13 Sept 2026, 01:006,736-14
8 Sept 2026, 21:206,750-45
3 Sept 2026, 10:446,795-7
31 Aug 2026, 04:186,802-15
27 Aug 2026, 21:116,817no change
27 Aug 2026, 19:446,817-9
24 Aug 2026, 19:546,826-13
21 Aug 2026, 03:446,839first reading

Engagement

No public post preview. We read this entry on 3 November 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

PW CUET Wallah
@pwcuetwallah · 62,242
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 20 August 2026
CUET ADDA247
@cuetAdda247 · 85,546
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CUET Books PYQs” (@books_cuet), 6,613 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/books_cuet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.