2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 339–341 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 10:00
340
no change
10 Aug 2026, 09:46
340
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.6%
avg views ÷ 340 subscribers
Avg views / post
56.6
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
24.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
9 (20 July 2026 – 9 August 2026)
Views total
509
Reactions total
125
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
689
Videos
42
Links
116
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5m 14s
Average length
5m 14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
125 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5395636456116998807
38
30.4%
custom 5395759833347543169
35
28.0%
custom 5395772902933025257
26
20.8%
custom 5404374558490786904
26
20.8%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩🤩 #прочитанное
как же меня помотала эта история… вроде 300 страничек, но как много эмоций!!!
конец мне было очень тяжело читать, безумно больно за героев и все, что там происходило.
герои все 10/10
сюжет 10/10
атмосфера 10/10
эмоции 10/10
вся книга 1000/10!!!!
это было реально ОЧЕНЬ хорошо. я приятно удивлена и, думаю, она может войти в топ года
#красный_сокол #аврора_пайель
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
начала читать пару дней назад, когда дочитала «этим летом я стала красивой» (отзыв нужен?).
❤️🔥 честно, я с одной стороны
❤️🔥давно хотела прочитать эту книгу, а с другой… особо никаких ожиданий не было. думала, это обычный спортивный роман, где все будет максимально глупо и банально. НО КАК ЖЕ ЭТО ШИКАРНО
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
одна из немногих книг за последние пару месяцев, в которой я за один …
у меня опять затуманился разум и я покупаю новые книги….
какую из этих новелл посоветуете? я еще ни с одним автором не знакома, так что нужна помощь, чтобы не купить ИХ ВСЕ
🤩🤩 day one — done 🖇️#отзыв
🤩🤩 «неделя, чтобы
🌱 влюбиться»
🌱 😆Катя Саммер
—А можно влюбиться всего за неделю?
—Можно влюбиться и за один миг.
что могу сказать?
это было нормально, именно нормально. не хорошо, не плохо.
основные моменты я рассказала на видео (ссылка на тик ток), а здесь добавляю некоторые детали:
🫶во-первых необычно было читать книгу от лица парня, но это было достаточн…
1️⃣🙂📽️🤍1️⃣❤️😆🙂📽️
это было… интересно. мне по вайбу и настроению очень зашло, хотя косяки, определено, есть.
завтра постараюсь заснять отзыв, а пока всем сладких снов!!💕
#неделя_чтобы_влюбиться #катя_саммер
планирую сделать 3 дня 3 книги, снимать влог в тикток?
да, снимай, буду смотреть!95%
не, не надо10%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤩🤩 новые книги!
🤩🤩 2 часть
🤩 «ты пахнешь как море»
заключительная книга цикла Эллин Ти!! безумно уже хочу ее прочитать
🤩 «самый синий из всех»
купила эту книгу по скидке из-за хорошего отзыва Эллин Ти! она очень хвалила эту историю, так что ожидания высокие)
🤩 «без любви не считается»
любимая Алекс Хилл!!
читали что-то из этого?
#новые_книги
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @bookmariasha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
планирую сделать 3 дня 3 книги, снимать влог в тикток?
да, снимай, буду смотреть!95%
не, не надо10%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 848,698 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“#букмари🦩| лови момент” (@bookmariasha), 340 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bookmariasha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
