Channel
@booklidia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,543subscribers
+272 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002209497191 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @booklidia |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/booklidia |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 1,543 | -11 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 1,554 | -8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 1,562 | -16 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:18 | 1,578 | -20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:15 | 1,598 | -74 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 1,672 | +119 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 1,553 | +196 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 1,357 | +42 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 1,315 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 1,318 | +15 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 1,303 | +45 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 1,258 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 1,271 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 1,271 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
157 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 36.3% | |
| 🔥 | 55 | 35.0% | |
| 😍 | 45 | 28.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На этом канале почти не было контента про детские книги, но сегодня я почему-то задержалась в соответствующем уголке Читай-города, и у меня разбежались глаза от красоты: 🔵Обложки к некоторым книгам будто сошли с полотен лучших музеев 🔵Блестящая обложка «Незнайки», созданная, чтобы сиять 🔵Красивейшая обложка Снежной королевы в серии Большие книги 🔵«Алиса в стране чудес» во всевозможных оформлениях. На фото книга неста…
❤6😍3🔥1
“Во сколько лет вы узнали, как выглядит бергамот?” – вспомнила я мем, когда увидела этот пончик на витрине. Как выглядит бергамот я помню, но не прощу себе, если не попробую пончик с этим вкусом. Сказано – сделано, люблю десерты с цитрусовой кислинкой. Выяснять, как выглядит пончик с бергамотом и пробовать его на вкус можно в Зое
❤9😍5🔥4
И самое необычное в романе – связь реальной жизни и выдуманной истории, которую автор воплотил в жизнь с помощью настоящего Музея невинности, открытого в Стамбуле. В 2014 года он был удостоен звания Европейского музея года. Орхан Памук собирал коллекцию музея более 15 лет и посвящена она культуре и быту Стамбула 1970-х годов. Книга писалась как брошюру к музею, но потом роман зажил отдельной жизнью и сейчас я бы вос…
❤6🔥5😍3
Пытаюсь собраться с мыслями, чтобы написать отзыв на «Музей невинности» Орхана Памука. Это одна из немногих книг, которую мне хотелось бросить почти с самого начала. Однако необъяснимая магия слога нобелевского лауреата и атмосфера Стамбула, который тоже будто являлся действующим лицом, удерживала меня, ну и, конечно, хотелось узнать, что будет дальше с главными героями, хотя об исходе я стала догадываться еще задол…
🔥7😍7❤6
Что сейчас читают в разных книжных клубах? Собрала небольшой топ: 🩷 Джон Стейнбек «К востоку от Эдема» 🩷 Жауме Кабре «Я исповедуюсь» 🩷 Энди Вейер «Проект Аве Мария» 🩷 Мадлен Миллер «Цирцея» 🩷 Александр Куприн «Яма» 🩷 Валери Перрен «Поменяй воду цветам» Читали что-то из списка?
🔥9😍9❤8
Я: не могу найти сумку, в которой было бы удобно носить книгу. Буду ходить с шоппером. Бренды: держи сумку с дополнительным горизонтальным отделением для книги.
🔥18❤10😍10
Продолжаем путешествовать с книгами. И сегодня подборка с авторами из Латинской Америки. В ней много ярких стран и не менее ярких имен, которые стали известны во многом благодаря методу магического реализма, а также обращению к историческим, политическим и социальным сюжетам. 🔵Габриэль Гарсия Маркес «Любовь во время чумы» (Колумбия) История любви, побеждающей все, от лауреата Нобелевской премии по литературе 1982 г.…
❤12🔥11😍8
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @booklidia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Книгобулочное издание” (@booklidia), 1,543 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/booklidia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.