new nails by моя любимая ксюша 🤩
❤10💘4🔥4

Channel
@bookgiz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,316subscribers
-49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001196113771 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bookgiz |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bookgiz |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 2,316 | -4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:20 | 2,320 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:59 | 2,322 | -6 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 2,328 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:13 | 2,329 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 2,331 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 2,334 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 2,339 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 2,345 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 2,347 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 2,348 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 2,357 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 2,361 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 2,365 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
156 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 89 | 57.1% | |
| 😱 | 15 | 9.62% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 8.33% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 5.13% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 5.13% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 4.49% | |
| 🍓 | 6 | 3.85% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 3.85% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
new nails by моя любимая ксюша 🤩
❤10💘4🔥4
к слову причина почему я ныла о том что хочу перечитать «Правило номер 5» 🤩 начала новиночку от Дж.Уайлдер «Заманчивое предложение» секси миллиардер, фиктивный брак 🤩 а ещё это история Мисти, её мы знаем, как соседку Пайпер из «Правила игры» так что здесь наши любимые пидорасы с серии про хоккеистов! а еще, я дочитала «Разрушь меня» Тахира Мафи, МНЕ ПОНРАВИЛОСЬ!
❤7🔥1
хочу перечитать «правило номер 5» какой же Джекс хорошенький, такой он джентельмен, такой влюбленный пес 😭
🥰8❤🔥3🍓2🕊1
в июле прочитала манхву «Люби осторожно» 🤩 я влюбилась с первой главы в главного героя. он популярный парень в универе, влюбляется в отличницу и начинает бегать за ней, ухаживать. и все 20 глав все было идеально, пока авторша не решила добавить драму ради драмы. тогда я возненавидела мгг, непонятный и никому ненужный таймксип, глупая жгг, которая все ему простила и вот оценка 5/10 и 5ка только за первые 20 глав🤩 а …
❤13🥰2❤🔥1🍓1🕊1
интересное я заметила в читай городе 🤩 когда я пишу отрицательные отзывы (делаю это крайне редко) то их чаще всего очень долго держат на модерации, либо вообще не выкладывают со словами «неинформативно» 🤩
😱15💔6❤2❤🔥1🍓1🕊1
дочитала первую новеллу Ребеккы Яррос про горячих пожарных 🤩 не думала, что буду на стороне тех кому не зашло, но вот я тут и пришла поворчать 😭 вообще, я очень люблю такие истории с маленькими городками, поэтому плюсик есть. и если честно, то это единственный плюсик… слишком все быстро развивалось, ниче неясно, герои раньше любили друг друга. мгг Себастьян бросил её и сбежал из города ничего не сказав, потом верн…
❤23❤🔥1🍓1🕊1
пьем вкусный джус с моей викторией на веранде, которая снова закроется через полгода🤩
❤18🥰3🍓1💔1🕊1
файнали, я пишу о прочитанных книга в июле🤩 прочитано всего 6 книг + 2 книги, которые не дочитала, в видео все объяснила 🫣+ одна завершенная гет манхва не могу сказать, какая книга очень понравилась, все было хорошо, ничего не могу выделить хд а вот худшая: «Покоренная судьбой» Кора Рейли история про детей не зашла… а манхва «Люби осторожно» думаю про эту историю я расскажу более подробно, много нюансов хд и вообщ…
❤16🔥3❤🔥1💔1🕊1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @bookgiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“книжный интроверт” (@bookgiz), 2,316 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bookgiz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.