Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 读舍 FM

Channel

读舍 FM

@bookcn

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,993subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001153165071
TypeChannel
Username@bookcn
CreatedBetween 1 October 2018 and 31 May 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/bookcn

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

3,9723,9953,983.56 August 2026 — 3,982 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,982 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,983 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,984 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,982 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,983 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,985 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,986 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,992 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,995 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,992 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,995 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,988 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,984 subscribers18 September 2026 — 3,972 subscribers27 September 2026 — 3,982 subscribers5 October 2026 — 3,983 subscribers12 October 2026 — 3,978 subscribers15 October 2026 — 3,986 subscribers18 October 2026 — 3,987 subscribers21 October 2026 — 3,990 subscribers24 October 2026 — 3,987 subscribers27 October 2026 — 3,985 subscribers31 October 2026 — 3,988 subscribers2 November 2026 — 3,993 subscribers3,9936 August 20262 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 89 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,969–3,998 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 16:063,993+5
31 Oct 2026, 00:273,988+3
27 Oct 2026, 19:073,985-2
24 Oct 2026, 16:053,987-3
21 Oct 2026, 13:393,990+3
18 Oct 2026, 19:173,987+1
15 Oct 2026, 16:373,986+8
12 Oct 2026, 07:563,978-5
5 Oct 2026, 19:153,983+1
27 Sept 2026, 23:413,982+10
18 Sept 2026, 08:153,972-12
13 Sept 2026, 18:203,984-4
9 Sept 2026, 13:373,988-7
4 Sept 2026, 12:583,995+3
31 Aug 2026, 17:363,992-3
28 Aug 2026, 21:363,995+3
26 Aug 2026, 04:343,992+6
22 Aug 2026, 19:563,986+1
19 Aug 2026, 14:073,985+2
16 Aug 2026, 19:533,983first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

69 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4362.3%
😁1420.3%
❤1217.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2023 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jun 2026, 15:33 UTC≈1,080 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

关于阅读这件事,这篇文章讲的很专业 https://sspai.com/post/110557

❤3👍3

Signed Shawn Xie

5 Jun 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,090 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

机核把《地海巫师》讲完了: https://www.gcores.com/albums/308

❤2👍1

Signed Shawn Xie

2 Jun 2026, 12:21 UTC≈1,210 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

最近看了下今年的 Locus 轨迹奖获奖名单。 https://reactormag.com/winners-2026-locus-awards/ 最佳科幻长篇:《作者之死》(Death of the Author)—— Nnedi Okorafor 这本书最吸引我的地方是它讨论的不是太空战争或者未来科技,而是“创作者”本身。 一个普通作家因为写出爆款作品而一夜成名,随后开始面对作品脱离自己掌控、公众重新定义自己身份的过程。AI、文化认同、名人效应这些当代话题也都融进了故事里。 感觉这类聚焦“人”的科幻作品,这几年越来越受欢迎了。 最佳奇幻长篇:《永恒者》(The Everlasting)—— Alix E. Harrow 相比传统奇幻里的冒险和战争,这本书更像是在讲一个国家的历史是如何被创造出来的。 神话、传说、记忆和现实交织在一起,每一代人都在重新书写过去。 Alix E. Harrow 的文字一直很有味…

👍2❤1

Signed Shawn Xie

23 Apr 2026, 02:55 UTC≈1,510 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

今天是世界读书日。读舍群的群友今天可以放下书休息一下了。 #世界读书日

😁14

Signed Shawn Xie

15 Jul 2024, 12:05 UTC≈8,290 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://openbookshongkong.com

👍13

Signed Shawn Xie

31 Dec 2023, 12:09 UTC≈10,500 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

#每周一书 #EP30 📖S2EP30《千面英雄》:揭开神话面纱与现代英雄之旅 📝《千面英雄》是一本开创性的作品,由神话学大师约瑟夫·坎贝尔撰写,深入探讨了穿越古今东西的英雄叙事——一个与人类文化的根本心理结构紧密相连的普遍模式。这一迷人的研究不仅仅揭示了各种神话传说中共通的英雄旅程框架,还阐释了这一旅程如何对应个人的成长过程,促使人们反思自我与社会的关系。无论是对神话学感兴趣,还是寻求个人生命中深层次的启迪,坎贝尔的这部杰作都将提供一次思想上的冒险,激励着每一位读者去发现自己生活故事中的英雄之旅。 🛒你可以从这里购买:https://u.jd.com/JuYLxqJ 🌍网站:https://shu.fm/posts/s2ep30/ 📻收听渠道:苹果播客|小宇宙|Google Podcast|Spotify 搜索「读舍FM」

👍9❤1

Signed Shawn Xie

25 Dec 2023, 07:51 UTC≈8,620 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

#每周一书 #EP29 📖S2EP29《红与黑》:时代的镜像与个人的探索 📝《红与黑》是法国作家司汤达经典之作,描绘了19世纪法国社会的复杂性和阶级矛盾。这部心理小说中跌宕起伏的情节,不仅映射了历史背景下的社会冲突,更深入地探讨了个人理想、野心与道德的较量。主人公朱利安·索莱尔的故事是对成就与失败、轮回与挣扎的生动描写,展示了人物命运和社会环境相互纠缠的复杂关系。如果你对探索人性深层的文学作品感兴趣,对历史小说和心理剖析富有兴致,那么《红与黑》无疑是一本不可多得的佳作。这是一部经久不衰的文学宝典,对任何热爱深度思考社会和人物性格的读者而言,都是必读之选。 🛒你可以从这里购买:https://u.jd.com/EsxiJcG 🌍网站:https://shu.fm/posts/s2ep29/ 📻收听渠道:苹果播客|小宇宙|Google Podcast|Spotify 搜索「读舍FM」

👍3

Signed Shawn Xie

16 Dec 2023, 15:17 UTC≈6,670 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

#每周一书 #EP28 📖S2EP28《穷查理宝典》:深入查理·芒格的智慧财富 📝《穷查理宝典》携带着查理·芒格,这位投资界传奇人物的丰富智慧和深刻见解。此书不仅汇集了芒格数十年的演讲与文章,更提炼出了他对多学科思维和认知误判的独到理解。在其中,我们不只学到如何做出明智的投资决策,还能发现如何在日常生活中运用这些原则来加强思维、避开误区,并促进个人成长。无论是投资者、商业决策者,还是求知欲旺盛的读者,都能在《穷查理宝典》中找到宝贵的知识财富。 🛒你可以从这里购买:https://u.jd.com/A8mIXYk 🌍网站:https://shu.fm/posts/s2ep28/ 📻收听渠道:苹果播客|小宇宙|Google Podcast|Spotify 搜索「读舍FM」

❤2👍2

Signed Shawn Xie

11 Dec 2023, 05:51 UTC≈5,850 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

#每周一书 #EP28 📖S2EP27《疼痛部》:探索人类疼痛与存在的文学之旅 📝《疼痛部》是杜布拉夫卡·乌格雷西奇的一部引人入胜的作品,它以其深入的思考和精湛的叙事能力而闻名。通过故事中的人物和情节,乌格雷西奇探索了人类疼痛的多个方面,从身体到心灵的痛苦,以及个体和社会的矛盾。通过细腻的描写和独特的视角,她让读者思考生命的意义和人性的复杂性。《疼痛部》是一部引人深思的文学之旅,必将让读者深受触动。 🛒你可以从这里购买:https://u.jd.com/Au1aNrX 🌍网站:https://shu.fm/posts/s2ep27/ 📻收听渠道:苹果播客|小宇宙|Google Podcast|Spotify 搜索「读舍FM」

❤1

Signed Shawn Xie

3 Dec 2023, 12:21 UTC≈4,660 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

#每周一书 #EP26 📖S2EP26《论自由》:个人权利与政府干预的艰难较量 📝《论自由》是约翰·穆勒的政治哲学经典,集古典自由主义理论之大成。阐述个人自由的核心思想:个人享有完全的思想、言论和个性自由,但受限于不伤害他人的范围。政府限权和宪政制衡是对个人自由的保护。本书强调个人自由与社会责任的平衡,引发对政府干预和个人权利的辩论。对追求自由和社会平衡的思想家和个体都有启发。 🛒你可以从这里购买:https://u.jd.com/ZuHjxW4 🌍网站:https://shu.fm/posts/s2ep26/ 📻收听渠道:苹果播客|小宇宙|Google Podcast|Spotify 搜索「读舍FM」

👍1

Signed Shawn Xie

25 Nov 2023, 12:08 UTC≈3,900 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

#每周一书 #EP25 📖S2EP25《强风吹拂》: 征服箱根驿传的奋斗与友情 📝《强风吹拂》是一部感人至深的小说,讲述了阿走和宽政大学宿舍的舍友们一起组建杂牌长跑队,挑战日本历史最悠久、备受瞩目的长跑接力赛“箱根驿传”的故事。在这个充满困难和挑战的旅程中,他们不仅体验到了田径训练的艰辛,也建立起了深厚的友谊。作者三浦紫苑以细腻入微的笔触,描绘了角色们的成长与蜕变,让读者在阅读中感受到运动的力量和人性的美好。这是一部既温暖又励志的作品,对于喜欢体育、友情与成长题材的读者来说,绝对是一本不能错过的图书。 🛒你可以从这里购买:https://u.jd.com/ZbuxWsU 🌍网站:https://shu.fm/posts/s2ep25/ 📻收听渠道:苹果播客|小宇宙|Google Podcast|Spotify 搜索「读舍FM」

👍1

Signed Shawn Xie

18 Nov 2023, 15:57 UTC≈3,180 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

#每周一书 #EP24 📖S2EP24《幻灭》: 理想与现实冲突中的人性剖析 📝《幻灭》是法国大文豪巴尔扎克的一部杰作,作品以巴尔扎克独特的视角和生动的笔触,描绘了两个才华横溢的青年在社会现实面前理想破灭的悲剧。这本书深入地揭示了资本主义社会下的无情现实,展现了个体在追求理想道路上的挣扎与困惑。在巴尔扎克的笔下,每一个细微的描绘都充满了力量,每一个人物都具有生动的命运。《幻灭》是一部扣人心弦的现实主义巨作,除了对理想与现实、才华与命运的深刻探讨,更是对人性的深入剖析。无论你是文学爱好者还是社会观察者,都能在这部作品中找到共鸣和感动。它不仅能让你思考人生,也会让你对生活有更深刻的理解。推荐给所有热爱阅读,热爱生活的你。 🛒你可以从这里购买:https://u.jd.com/Wz6sGOY 🌍网站:https://shu.fm/posts/s2ep24/ 📻收听渠道:苹果播客|小宇宙|Google Podcast|Spot…

👍4❤1

Signed Shawn Xie

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bookcn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“读舍 FM” (@bookcn), 3,993 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bookcn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.