https://t.me/bookclub_uz?boost

Channel
Book Club Uz
@bookclub_uz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
594subscribers
+55 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001378410254 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bookclub_uz |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bookclub_uz |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 594 | +27 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 567 | +18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 549 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 550 | +6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 544 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 535 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 539 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
79 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 32.9% | |
| 😍 | 11 | 13.9% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 11.4% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 10.1% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 7.59% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 7.59% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 3.80% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 3.80% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 3.80% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 2.53% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⏳ Успейте записаться — осталось всего 3 места! ⬇️⬇️⬇️ 💬 telegram
😱2
📚 Почему хорошие люди совершают плохие поступки? А плохие — иногда становятся героями? Что, если свободы воли гораздо меньше, чем нам кажется, а наши решения рождаются задолго до того, как мы их осознаём? 🗓 16 августа (воскресенье) приглашаем вас на встречу книжного клуба, где мы обсудим одну из самых обсуждаемых научно-популярных книг последних лет — «Биология добра и зла» Роберта Сапольски. Это будет разговор не…
❤4🔥1🆒1
Книга недели #13 📚 «Биология добра и зла» — Роберт Сапольски Жанр: научпоп Язык оригинала: английский Дата написания: 2017 Количество страниц: 766 __________ 📖 О чём книга: Это глубокий разбор нейробиологии поведения человека — от проявлений жестокости и агрессии до высших актов эмпатии, самопожертвования и альтруизма. Роберт Сапольски — американский нейроэндокринолог, приматолог и профессор Стэнфордского универ…
❤3👍1😍1
Регистрация закрыта
Увидимся…✋
❤4
📚 Встреча книжного клуба 🗓️ 2/08/26 в Воскресенье ➡️Обсуждаем книгу 📚«О дивный новый мир» Олдоса Хаксли. Вас ждут: ✨ тёплая и дружеская атмосфера; ✨ интересное обсуждение книги; ✨ новые интересные знакомства. Для гостей вне клуба есть 3 свободных места ✋ Успейте забронировать: 💬 telegram
😍6🆒2❤1
Книга недели #12 📚 «О дивный новый мир» — Олдос Леонард Хаксли Жанр: антиутопия Язык оригинала: английский Дата написания: 1931 Дата публикации: 1932 Количество страниц: 220-350 __________ 📖 О чём книга: «О дивный новый мир», другие название «Прекрасный новый мир» и «Счастливый новый мир» (англ. Brave New World) — антиутопический сатирический роман о предупреждение о том, как технологии и общество потребления мог…
❤2
ℹ️ Сегодня у нас по плану: 🤾 Идём играть в падел 😊 🗣️ Обсудим рассказ Владимира Тендрякова «Хлеб для собаки» 📚 ⬇️ 🔗 Скачать книгу ℹ️ Дополнительно: 📖 Мы уже утвердили книгу недели, которую будем обсуждать 2 августа 2026 года. 🗳️ Пост с книгой, победившей в голосовании, будет опубликован сегодня вечером 🌃 ✨ Не пропустите! ✨
❤2👍2😍2⚡1
Ребята, выхожу к вам за советом! 🤍🙏📚 В клубе никак не можем определиться, какую книгу выбрать для следующего обсуждения. Хороших книг так много, что глаза разбегаются, но хочется найти именно ту, которая подарит яркие эмоции и станет поводом для увлекательной дискуссии ☕️🧸📖🤯🔳 Ждем ваши рекомендации! 💋 Кстати, автор лучшей рекомендации получит пригласительный билет на обсуждение этой книги. 🎫🎁
Как правило, дочитав книгу, надо обсудить и обязательно посмотреть её качественную экранизацию 🎞️ Я в полном восторге от книги ❤️ «Ангелы и Демоны» — Ден Браун 📕
❤2
Встреча сегодня в 18:30 🕡
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bookclub_uz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Друзья! Есть ли среди вас те, кто читает книги, выбранные в клубе?
- Да, это я 🙂↕️10%
- Нет, я просто слежу 🕵️23%
- Хочется присоединиться, но стесняюсь ☺️19%
- Хотелось бы, но читаю медленно, либо времени нет 🫠26%
- Читаю свои книги, подписан просто так 😏42%
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📕 The Book of the week… Hi 👋 Do we have any English-speaking subscribers here?
- Yes, I’m a foreigner7%
- Yes, but I’m a local resident93%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Book Club Uz” (@bookclub_uz), 594 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bookclub_uz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.