Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bonusbing | Deneme Bonusu & Freespin Casino

Channel

Bonusbing | Deneme Bonusu & Freespin Casino

@bonusbing

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,164subscribers

-124 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001916754368
TypeChannel
Username@bonusbing
Description🎰 Deneme Bonusu | Casino 📩 Reklam: @Bonusb1ng 💰 Güncel deneme bonusu, freespin ve yatırım kampanyaları 🔥 Yeni giriş adresleri #denemebonusu #casino #bonus 🔗 https://telegra.ph/Bonusbing-11-20
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bonusbing

Growth

24,16424,30324,233.57 August 2026 — 24,288 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,302 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,303 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,289 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,290 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,299 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,271 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,284 subscribers15 August 2026 — 24,272 subscribers16 August 2026 — 24,275 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,244 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,195 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,183 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,172 subscribers22 August 2026 — 24,164 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 15 days, net -124. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,143–24,324 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 01:5624,164-8
20 Aug 2026, 20:0824,172-11
19 Aug 2026, 19:4224,183-12
18 Aug 2026, 17:0324,195-49
17 Aug 2026, 20:3824,244-31
16 Aug 2026, 22:2524,275+3
15 Aug 2026, 19:1324,272-12
14 Aug 2026, 07:3724,284+13
13 Aug 2026, 02:0424,271-28
12 Aug 2026, 02:4324,299+9
11 Aug 2026, 03:0424,290+1
10 Aug 2026, 05:2224,289-14
9 Aug 2026, 05:0324,303+1
8 Aug 2026, 07:1024,302+14
7 Aug 2026, 12:1524,288first reading

Engagement

655 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.54%
avg views ÷ 24,164 subscribers
Avg views / post
130
655 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.494%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
655
of 655 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 53 of 655 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held655 (7 August 202622 August 2026)
Views total85,408
Reactions total57
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10,700
Videos
446
Links
198,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

57 reactions across 49 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3968.4%
👍712.3%
35.26%
🎉35.26%
🔥35.26%
❤‍🔥11.75%
🤩11.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 655 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 655 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC81 viewsread 22 August 2026

TİPOBET TipomanKazandırıyor https://tpbtgrsgn.xyz/Register-3562

Showing the 12 most recent of 655 posts we hold for @bonusbing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,005,176 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Betine Club
@BetineClub · 61,696
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
Baywin Official
@baywinsocial · 76,689
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 August 2026
Saha Resmi Telegram
@resmisaha · 101,526
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 20 August 2026
Betine Official
@betineofficialtg · 63,126
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 August 2026
Zlot
@zlotoriginals · 92,217
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 17 August 2026
Holigan
@holigantg · 212,294
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 August 2026
GrandPasha Resmi
@grandpashagir · 164,429
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bonusbing | Deneme Bonusu & Freespin Casino” (@bonusbing), 24,164 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bonusbing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.