Пока я только собираюсь отфоткать свою раскраску АЛИНКА ЭТО ДЕЛАЕТ! 😂
custom 54610890132239296094custom 54317769394655166942custom 54610571488615603682

Channel
@bonnoir_art
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
155subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001715022553 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bonnoir_art |
| Description | Illustrator, 2d artist |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bonnoir_art |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 155 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 155 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (4 June 2026 – 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 171 |
| Reactions total | 80 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
228 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5850353890809090517 | 47 | 20.6% | |
| custom 5431776939465516694 | 45 | 19.7% | |
| custom 5461089013223929609 | 38 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5460673376353793691 | 28 | 12.3% | |
| ❤ | 27 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5969628139096117975 | 22 | 9.65% | |
| custom 5461057148861560368 | 15 | 6.58% | |
| custom 5330353545923280423 | 4 | 1.75% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.439% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.439% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пока я только собираюсь отфоткать свою раскраску АЛИНКА ЭТО ДЕЛАЕТ! 😂
custom 54610890132239296094custom 54317769394655166942custom 54610571488615603682
Нынче тренд на раскраски и чем я собственно хуже? ❤️🔥 И начать свой путь в мир карандашей и маркеров мне поможет новенькая, недавно вышедшая раскраска от моей любимой подружки-художницы Боночки Ну что сказать.. Это прям колоссальный шедевр! С кучей деталей и разными иллюстрациями, которые придутся каждому на вкус. Есть и маленькие, и большие и что особенно нравится, на каждой странице составлен плейлист! Кстати, я…
custom 54317769394655166948custom 54606733763537936917custom 59696281390961179755
А у вас так бывает? Наскетчишь что-то, начнешь красить, а потом какой-то фрагмент так увлечет, что ты уже его финалишь, а на остальной иллюстрации еще кот не валялся? Рубрика "вредные советы" 😅 Но обезьянками этими я очень довольна ❤️ ах да! Так же для АСТ🤗!
custom 58503538908090905179❤4custom 53303535459232804234custom 54317769394655166942custom 54606733763537936912🐳1👍1
А у меня подъехало много контента! Додумалась спросить у редактора разрешения постить фрагменты иллюстраций к замечательному детскому изданию, над которым сейчас работаю для АСТ! Темп работы крайне интенсивный, картинок куча, сдача в конце лета, так что я рисую целыми днями, и очень хочется показывать! Потому что мне ну оооочень нравится, что получается! 😲🥹 Так что в ббллиижайшее время тут будет мннноггоо всякого, …
custom 585035389080909051712❤9custom 54606733763537936915custom 54317769394655166943
Внимание! Внимание! На даче была обнаружена некоторая маленьковость! Принесла вам для умиления! Если вам интересно, как я привлекла столько внимания, — я громко 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 В шоке не только коты.
custom 585035389080909051714custom 59696281390961179756custom 54610571488615603684custom 54610890132239296092
Ничто не может остановить иллюстратора на пути к его авторским экземплярам 😂 Сидела я вчера, приспокойненько рисовала книжку и тут мне приходит почтопуш о том, что меня ждёт посылка с моей страшной раскраской! Ну я, конечно, ноги в руки и бегом забирать! А на улице ТАКОЕ. ТААААКООООЕЕЕЕ! Красивое, конечно, будто Ван Гог руку приложил. А ещё я видела смерч на пустыре. И передвигалась перебежками. Несмотря на зонт, в п…
custom 543177693946551669410custom 54610890132239296098custom 54606733763537936917
Принесла вам немножко котячьего ренессанса по утру🐱
❤14custom 58503538908090905178custom 54610890132239296094custom 59696281390961179751
"не буду доставать палитру, так, чисто в одном месте мазну из банки"
custom 54610890132239296099custom 54606733763537936917custom 59696281390961179755
И тут Лёша напрягся...😈
custom 543177693946551669410custom 54610571488615603686custom 54610890132239296095
👋Сегодня уже посмелее чувствовала себя с аэрографом. У меня были подопытные: Иишный Хагрид с плохо пропечатавшимся зонтиком (точнее уже без него), какой то рандомный бард-эльф, который мне просто очень зашёл и Дарт Вейдер, потому что как же без него?! Забрала черный грунт, увлеклась немного и теперь вместо обычной грунтовки там целый подмалевок. Это вообще нормально? Кто знает, в росписи фигурок живописные приемник р…
custom 54610890132239296096custom 54317769394655166944custom 58503538908090905174
Ну что, я 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 это! Такая я ссыкуха, конечно, чо переживала, непонятно. Если что, щупальце это — подставка для аэрографа. Но у моего есть непредусмотренный в подставке этой клапан, который не даёт ему вольготно разместиться в ее пазу, поэтому всё вместе падает. Но КАК ЖЕ Я ЛЮБЛЮ ТЕНТАКЛИ! Сущий экстаз их рисовать и раскрашивать 😏 Так что я решила её покрасить, даже не шлифовала особо и напечатала супер быстро, п…
custom 54317769394655166946custom 59696281390961179755custom 54610571488615603683
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @bonnoir_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 50,256 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bonnoir | Чердак иллюстратора” (@bonnoir_art), 155 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bonnoir_art.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.