Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 《布尔什维克》

Channel

《布尔什维克》

@bolshevik_red

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,816subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002006671859
TypeChannel
Username@bolshevik_red
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bolshevik_red

Growth

1,7881,8161,8027 August 2026 — 1,788 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,788 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,789 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,791 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,793 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,792 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,799 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,804 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,810 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,816 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 23 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,784–1,820 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 20:331,816+6
27 Aug 2026, 16:041,810+6
24 Aug 2026, 06:571,804+5
20 Aug 2026, 20:451,799+7
17 Aug 2026, 20:531,792-1
14 Aug 2026, 14:041,793+2
10 Aug 2026, 21:011,791+2
7 Aug 2026, 17:081,789+1
7 Aug 2026, 15:471,788no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:181,788first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

188 reactions across 16 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7439.4%
3920.7%
🔥3116.5%
👏105.32%
🥰94.79%
👎52.66%
❤‍🔥31.60%
😁31.60%
🙉31.60%
21.06%
🎉21.06%
🙈21.06%
👨‍💻10.532%
🕊10.532%
🖕10.532%
😭10.532%
🫡10.532%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 01:03 UTC330 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

1929年华尔街股灾对今天的启示(上) 近日,除了伊朗战争对全球造成的剧烈震荡外,前世界也在担忧着另一颗经济未爆弹:主要在西方金融市场酝酿的AI泡沫。世界货币基金和英格兰银行等组织自去年以来纷纷警告其危险。与此同时,自2024年以来,西方金融市场开始传出某些“影子银行”,即非正式银行但以提供信贷为营业模式的企业开始出现危机,规模高达三千万亿。某些如此的企业突然倒塌,而摩根大通执行长Jamie Diamond也警告这些案例如同“蟑螂”:有一必有二。 从西方开始爆发新一轮金融崩盘已经成为巨大可能,而马克思主义者也有必要学习、分析这种发展的重要先例:1929年的华尔街股灾。当时几乎一夜之间,数百万人的命运便被市场那只所谓“看不见的手”无情地推向深渊。 #经济 #危机 #1929大萧条

👍61❤‍🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC348 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

当水灾撞上官僚主义——人祸放大天灾 6月以来的大雨不仅打乱了广西人民的日常生活,更牵动了全国群众的心弦。洪灾不仅摧毁了当地居民的房屋、村庄,甚至连许多基础设施也遭到了破坏。7月6日,广西六蓝水库发生溃坝险情,更将这场灾害推向舆论焦点。面对一次次反复发生的洪灾,许多关心广西的群众尖锐地提出:真正放大这场灾难的,究竟只是极端天气,还是长期存在的管理和治理问题? #汛期 #广西 #官僚 #环境问题

4🔥3❤‍🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC507 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

《布尔什维克》杂志第六期:革命与女性解放——中国性别问题 (访问此网页下载) 过去的中国互联网女权运动就已经证明,性别解放议题蕴含的巨大阶级斗争潜力。如今,身份政治运动在中国衰落,资本主义危机继续加深。一面是青年人持阶级立场的广泛激进化,一面是经年来未曾止息的性别战争,例如彩礼、婚育等问题。 这都是危机的产物,那么解决办法是什么? 中国女性解放问题背后,一是就业和劳动权益的问题;二是社会保障系统的问题,它直指住房、育儿、养老、照护、家务劳动等工人阶级再生产自身的需求;三是教育社会和惩处犯罪的问题,它要求工人阶级拥相应的物质和政治杠杆。一句话,中国女性解放问题,就是工人阶级要掌管、改造社会的问题,就是社会主义革命的问题。 因此,必须辩证而非机械地用阶级方法分析性别问题并提出解放纲领。这种力量不容小觑。处理它需要阶级的方法论和分寸感的艺术。 #中国革命1949 #女性解放 #彩礼 #性别战争 #身份政治 #家务劳动 #十月

🥰8👎2❤‍🔥1👍1

23 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTC458 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

亲爱的同志们,《布尔什维克》月报7月份休刊休息,将于8月回归。

23 Jul 2026, 14:22 UTC449 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

亲爱的读者同志们,《布尔什维克》理论杂志第6期将于近期发布!本期杂志将围绕着女性解放问题展开,同志们届时可以于本频道下载或通过海外邮箱订阅、接收(订阅邮箱:[email protected])。本期杂志封面和目录如上

👍7

4 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC861 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

抗议的呼喊响彻街头——合肥垃圾中转站抗议的启示 6月27日晚,抗议的呼喊响彻合肥市的街头。上千名群众自发走上街头,反对政府在当地建设垃圾中转站。随着抗议规模不断扩大,当地政府不得不当即向群众宣布停止该项目。对于这场斗争而言,这无疑是一场属于群众的阶段性胜利。它再次说明了一个简单却重要的事实——当群众团结起来,依靠自身的集体行动捍卫自身利益时,即便是平日里高高在上的官僚,也不得不作出让步。 #群众斗争 #抗议 #集会 #阶级斗争 #时事评论

👍13🔥4😁31🙉1

3 Jul 2026, 22:03 UTC611 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @imt1917zhPhoto

中国共产党的创建:英雄主义与悲剧 一个世纪前(1921年7月1日)是中国共产党正式成立的日子。它最初是一个由忠诚而英勇的干部领导的真正的革命政党,却在1925至1927年的革命中走向悲剧性的失败。今天,中共已成为资本主义统治的工具,但它的早期历史充满了对当今革命者既鼓舞人心又发人警醒的教训。欲了解更多信息,我们推荐这两篇文章:中国共产党1927至1937年的历史与1937至1949年的历史;以及约翰·彼得·罗伯茨(John Peter Roberts)所著的《中国:从不断革命到反革命》,可在卫红出版社(Wellred Books)购买。(按:本文原文发布于2021年7月1日) #历史回顾 #理论学习 #中国 #共产党 #中国共产党 #革命 #斯大林主义

👍11👎2👨‍💻1🖕1

2 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC694 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

《布尔什维克》月报26年6月刊已出! 社论:权贵飞扬跋扈,群众水深火热 【现提供EPUB和PDF两种版本供同志们学习使用,请点击以上链接访问下载!】 目录 (1)社论:权贵飞扬跋扈,群众水深火热 (2)台湾问题何去何从? (3)中国帝国主义在中东 (4)热浪来袭,汛期已至,荒漠洪水:气候危机出路何在? (5)高考考生议政——为工人阶级而发声! (6)论“混的人”和“崩老头”:青年人往何处去? (7)广西地震:天灾还是人祸? 短评 (8)短评:“社会就不该给你们工作!”——巨婴资本家和沉默的青年人 转载 (9)国际特稿:以色列控制着美国吗? 特稿 (10)女性解放专题:女性斗争与阶级斗争 (11) 共产主义问答:没有独裁者,还有独裁制度吗? #月报 #布尔什维克

9👏2

18 Jun 2026, 20:30 UTC979 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

论“混的人”和“崩老头”:青年往何处去? 近来,“混的人”成为了中国互联网的热词。广大群众都关注到了这样一群青年——他们初高中辍学,在城市中过着收入不稳定的贫困生活(“混”)。对于社会经验较少、格外渴望经济独立、又对未来毫无期望的青少年来说,任何快速获得金钱的手段都格外诱人。 以现在格外猎奇的崩老头为例,“崩老头”指的是通过网络情感陪伴索取金钱,“崩”的人一般包括“精神小妹”、伪装成“精神小妹”的“精神小伙”、和产业化的利用或欺骗辍学青少年“崩老头”团伙。被“崩”的对象一般是二十到四十岁之间的工人。他们因为忙于工作而没有精力社交,于是互联网上默认通过金钱购买陪聊就成为了一种异化的满足情感需求的方式。 中共官僚用惯常的高高在上与虚伪指责“混的人”和“崩老头”:网信办声称这些现象来自于青年“不劳而获的心态、攀比的虚荣心”。可谁又能比吸血的资本家和官僚们更加不劳而获呢?谁又能比用奢侈品、豪宅装点自己的他们更加虚荣呢?那些批量生产出

🔥921

16 Jun 2026, 09:42 UTC856 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

中国帝国主义在中东 在过去的十年间,美帝国主义在中东的影响力经历了缓慢但难以逆转的衰落。与其实力上的衰落相对应的,美帝国主义对伊拉克、叙利亚、利比亚、阿富汗的入侵以及其对以色列帝国主义的长期支持,也令其在中东各国群众中的威望迅速下滑,并且在2023年的加沙战争后跌落至冰点。 与之相对的,中国帝国主义在这一地区的影响力则在过去的一个时期稳步上升,越发积极地介入地区局势。在2023年,中国促成了沙特阿拉伯和伊朗这一对互相冲突的次级帝国主义国家间的和解,随后又促成了巴勒斯坦各政治力量在北京的谈判。 中国帝国主义这些活动的动机是什么?它将起到怎样的影响?它会取代美帝国主义吗? #美国的衰落 #中国 #中东 #沙特阿拉伯 #阿联酋 #伊朗 #能源 #投资

👍8👎1🙈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bolshevik_red. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“《布尔什维克》” (@bolshevik_red), 1,816 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bolshevik_red.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.