Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for всадник апокалипсиса

Channel

всадник апокалипсиса

@bolkoshaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

43,983subscribers

-412 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001172340717
TypeChannel
Username@bolkoshaa
Descriptionобразец для не подражания @bolkonskaia сотрудничество: https://t.me/bolkonskaia_pr в перечне РКН: https://clck.ru/3LuMPP
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bolkoshaa

Growth

43,98344,39544,1896 August 2026 — 44,395 subscribers6 August 2026 — 44,395 subscribers6 August 2026 — 44,390 subscribers7 August 2026 — 44,385 subscribers8 August 2026 — 44,364 subscribers9 August 2026 — 44,358 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44,349 subscribers11 August 2026 — 44,334 subscribers12 August 2026 — 44,327 subscribers13 August 2026 — 44,304 subscribers14 August 2026 — 44,274 subscribers16 August 2026 — 44,250 subscribers17 August 2026 — 44,243 subscribers18 August 2026 — 44,226 subscribers19 August 2026 — 44,207 subscribers20 August 2026 — 44,189 subscribers21 August 2026 — 44,176 subscribers23 August 2026 — 44,145 subscribers25 August 2026 — 44,128 subscribers25 August 2026 — 44,095 subscribers27 August 2026 — 44,086 subscribers27 August 2026 — 44,073 subscribers29 August 2026 — 44,103 subscribers30 August 2026 — 44,091 subscribers31 August 2026 — 44,082 subscribers31 August 2026 — 44,069 subscribers1 September 2026 — 44,062 subscribers3 September 2026 — 44,054 subscribers4 September 2026 — 44,021 subscribers7 September 2026 — 43,983 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 32 days, net -412. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,921–44,457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 04:1843,983-38
4 Sept 2026, 12:3944,021-33
3 Sept 2026, 03:0844,054-8
1 Sept 2026, 22:1344,062-7
31 Aug 2026, 23:5744,069-13
31 Aug 2026, 02:3544,082-9
30 Aug 2026, 00:2544,091-12
29 Aug 2026, 00:3544,103+30
27 Aug 2026, 22:3444,073-13
27 Aug 2026, 00:2644,086-9
25 Aug 2026, 23:3844,095-33
25 Aug 2026, 02:0744,128-17
23 Aug 2026, 12:4644,145-31
21 Aug 2026, 19:4944,176-13
20 Aug 2026, 18:5344,189-18
19 Aug 2026, 17:3444,207-19
18 Aug 2026, 18:1444,226-17
17 Aug 2026, 17:1544,243-7
16 Aug 2026, 08:4844,250-24
14 Aug 2026, 20:5644,274first reading

Engagement

304 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.6%
avg views ÷ 43,983 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,510
290 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
290
of 304 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held304 (29 July 20268 September 2026)
Views total2,757,547
Reactions total63,495
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Sept 2026, 23:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
12,800
Videos
2,020
Links
613

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 36s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

68,573 reactions across 304 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19,50628.4%
custom 525584985634112422810,77715.7%
😁9,96814.5%
custom 52489467529747621393,8295.58%
😢3,8105.56%
custom 52697639827170996783,4435.02%
custom 54585417024804039073,4425.02%
custom 51882925247409763451,7722.58%
🔥1,7212.51%
custom 52064835280107046511,3141.92%
🤝1,3121.91%
😍1,2941.89%
custom 53504698412978936431,1901.74%
👏9391.37%
😱7941.16%
👍7301.06%
🤔6901.01%
custom 58323958207956938986420.936%
😨4430.646%
💅3600.525%
3 further kinds5970.871%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 304 of the 304 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68,573 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 304 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 304 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bolkoshaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 304 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 8 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Sept 2026, 11:59 UTC≈7,150 views142 reactionsread 8 September 2026

ПРЕДЛАГАЮ ПОГОВОРИТЬ О САМОРАЗВИТИЯХ что у вас там имеется? кто-нибудь начал новую жизнь с начала осени ?

custom 5269763982717099678111custom 5458541702480403907189custom 52064835280107046514

8 Sept 2026, 11:58 UTC≈7,200 views93 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Forwarded from @margaritamiovaa

я вчера сходила в зал смустя месяц перерыва 10 минут подрочила степпер дома начала делать задания по психологии и возвращаю чтение даже приготовила еду дома на обэд тоже новая преисполненная жизнь начинается?)))

93

8 Sept 2026, 11:53 UTC≈7,430 views84 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

пасхалочка 🙏

🤔6614custom 52489467529747621394

8 Sept 2026, 11:40 UTC≈7,560 views177 reactionsread 8 September 2026

все ясно, саморазвиваться здесь никто не хочет

😁107custom 52558498563411242286010

8 Sept 2026, 11:05 UTC≈8,210 views112 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

сходила подрочить 3кг гантели 💪 в этом зале есть: дорожки, эллипсы, велотренажеры гантельный ряд, 2 скамьи, 1 скамья для пресса, тяга верхнего и нижнего блока, кроссовер, груша, коврик что можно делать на жопу: • приседы в широкой и узкой постановке ног с гантелями • болгарские от скамьи, выпады на месте с гантелями • румынка + румынка на одну ногу с гантелями • мостик + одноногий мостик с гантелями • лягушка с

74🔥21🤔10custom 52064835280107046517

8 Sept 2026, 06:42 UTC≈9,890 views451 reactionsread 8 September 2026

блять, у меня так-то новая жизнь тут началась , если кто не в курсе я рано встала, убралась в квартире, вычистила ото всюду кошачьи волосы, постирала постельное белье, полезно позавтракала заказала всякие приблуды для уборки и уюта хотела ненадолго пропасть из блога (ну, до вечера хотя бы), чтобы вернуться сюда с новой версией себя, но ничто не сможет заткнуть мой пиздак 😂😂 нишевой таинственности и загадочности

👏216custom 5255849856341124228155😁4823custom 51882925247409763459

8 Sept 2026, 06:37 UTC≈10,000 views123 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

а, я вам еще вот про это средство не рассказывала !! мое открытие года: термоактивный спрей от Секты он гораздо пизже ORIBE, который стоит 7+ к я хз как он работает, но с ним волос как будто в 2 раза больше становится видимо он их какой-то пленкой покрывает, что они становятся плотными (главное не переборщить) у меня уже от них как-то был шампунь для глубокого очищения (покупала, когда пыталась вымыть железо и пр

94🔥1514

8 Sept 2026, 06:22 UTC≈10,100 views93 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

я снова поддалась влиянию рилсов 🙏 • салициловая кислота 2% — для глубокого очищения пор • увлажняющий крем с церамидами и центеллой еще ни разу не пробовала ни того, ни другого • гликолевая кислота 7% — это уже юзанное ) круто выравнивает цвет кожи лица, но я так поняла, она работает именно на поверхности, поры не очищает, поэтому могут образовываться комедоны

77🔥96😍1

8 Sept 2026, 04:11 UTC≈10,500 views190 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 525584985634112422815729🔥4

7 Sept 2026, 13:30 UTC≈11,800 views445 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

как фотки решают: секси полицейский — нищий скуф

😁314custom 520648352801070465165custom 5255849856341124228497🤝4custom 51882925247409763453custom 58323958207956938983

7 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTC≈11,800 views281 reactionsread 8 September 2026

я съела и то, и другое с завтрашнего дня категорически начинается новая жизнь.

😁21345👏17🤝6

7 Sept 2026, 12:51 UTC≈11,700 views314 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

бляяяяяять 😭 заказала сэндвич с тунцом в Bartels, а мне положили булочку в подарок естественно, я съела булочку, и никакой тунец мне уже нахуй не нужен )) я увеличиваюсь в размерах в геометрической прогрессии, потому что у меня до сих пор никак не может закрыться рот

218😁90🤝6

Showing the 12 most recent of 304 posts we hold for @bolkoshaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@bolkoshaa edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 September 2026
Most recent edit
8 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“всадник апокалипсиса” (@bolkoshaa), 43,983 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bolkoshaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.