Тот самый стилист «БЕРЁМ/НЕ БЕРЁМ»😉 Разбираю ваши гардеробы даже онлайн 😎
Здесь прямые ссылки на стильные вещи
Запись на мои услуги и сотрудничество писать 👉🏻 в @bolilaya_ksu
pj63431lycgw6zcw
РКН
https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67ea482706df63421e22a8
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -113. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,363–39,520 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 07:45
39,381
-30
13 Aug 2026, 23:38
39,411
-11
12 Aug 2026, 19:56
39,422
-23
11 Aug 2026, 21:02
39,445
-28
10 Aug 2026, 22:18
39,473
-7
10 Aug 2026, 01:51
39,480
-22
9 Aug 2026, 03:51
39,502
+1
8 Aug 2026, 02:27
39,501
+7
7 Aug 2026, 18:00
39,494
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:58
39,494
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.30%
avg views ÷ 39,381 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,870
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
30 (5 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
86,197
Reactions total
1,986
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,240
Videos
≈672
Links
≈389
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
14m 34s
Average length
1m 02s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,986 reactions across 30 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,085
54.6%
🔥
661
33.3%
😁
125
6.29%
👍
39
1.96%
👏
25
1.26%
😍
16
0.806%
⚡
11
0.554%
🤩
11
0.554%
🥰
5
0.252%
💯
3
0.151%
🎉
2
0.101%
🏆
1
0.05%
👌
1
0.05%
🦄
1
0.05%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,986reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
10.0%
3 of 30 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,430
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,840
over 27 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2RanykM9QDq
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
2Ranymen7po
1
13 August 2026
13 August 2026
2Ranyn94FsZ
1
6 August 2026
6 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Разбираем вашу вещь ❤️
Ну что, начинаем нашу новую рубрику!
И сегодня у нас сразу две интересные вещи — пушистый свитер красивого лаймового оттенка и леопардовые кроссовки.
И знаете, что я подумала, когда их увидела?
Я бы точно не отправляла их обратно в шкаф!!
Потому что обе вещи заметные, но при этом вполне носибельные. Просто им нужно немного помочь и правильно собрать вокруг них образ.
💛 Начнём со свитера.
…
«Вы у моей жены в карте желаний. Как сделать так, чтобы вы приехали к ней на разбор гардероба?»
Именно с этого сообщения началась эта история❤️
В начале июля мне написал муж одной из моих подписчиц. Оказалось, его жена давно мечтала о разборе гардероба именно со мной.
Мы договорились о встрече — в Ижевске.
И вот спустя некоторое время я уже еду к Марии. Поля, подсолнухи, много разговоров и предвкушение чего-то оч…
Собрала для вас стильную подборку на предстоящую осень от классного бренда OKSANA UTOVA BRAND 😍
📌Канал бренда в тг - https://t.me/oubrand_official
📌Канал бренда в MAX - https://max.ru/id731101939975_biz
📌Канал бренда в VK - https://vk.ru/ou.brand
У них самые трендовые цвета, фактуры и детали. Бренд, который действительно можно назвать дизайнерским✨
Подойдут на любой тип фигуры и будут сочетаться с любой одеждой …
MAAG… Выглядит красиво…но всё ли из этого стоит брать? Разбираю в этом видео
Куда идём дальше?
❤️- если нравится рубрика
С ❤️ Ваш стилист Ксения Болилая
смотреть контент в МАХ
смотреть контент в ВК канале
А знаете, какая вещь чаще всего недооценена в гардеробе?
Ремень.
Причём я сейчас не только про то, чтобы удерживать брюки 😂
Иногда один хороший ремень может полностью изменить привычный образ.
Надели джинсы, футболку и жакет — вроде бы всё знакомо.
Добавили ремень — и образ уже выглядит собраннее.
Поверх платья — он может подчеркнуть талию и изменить силуэт.
С широкими брюками — добавить структуру.
А если взя…
Девочки, только один день! 📛
Спешите сделать заказ!
Только 13 августа скидка 15% на ассортимент бренда Cozy Home на Wildberries на каждый заказ по моему промокоду - KEK2BRX5
Акция суммируются с другими предложениями.
Переходите по ссылке, чтобы оформить заказ - https://cozyhome.prfl.me/bolilayaksu/2goi55?erid=2Ranymen7po
А ещё я давно хочу попробовать одну штуку здесь, в канале 🤔
Разбирать ваши вещи!
Уверена, у многих есть та самая покупка, которая когда-то очень понравилась, а потом почему-то почти не носится.
Присылайте мне фотографии таких вещей, а я буду выбирать одну и разбирать вместе с вами:
Почему она «не работает», с чем её можно носить и можно ли вообще было обойтись без этой покупки? 😊
Мне кажется, может получиться оч…
А знаете, что я всё чаще замечаю? 🤔
Иногда для того, чтобы собрать совершенно новый образ, нам вообще не нужна новая одежда.
Достаточно взять одну привычную вещь и попробовать посмотреть на неё немного по-другому.
Вот, например, жакет.
Казалось бы, ну что с ним можно придумать?
Надеть с джинсами — и готово.
Но я решила показать вам, как одна и та же вещь может совершенно по-разному работать в гардеробе.
Первый …
А знаете, что я заметила♥️?
Каждый новый сезон мы вроде бы ждём чего-то нового — новые вещи, силуэты, сочетания…
А иногда достаточно просто добавить цвет, чтобы привычный гардероб заиграл совсем по-другому.
Собрала для вас 8 оттенков, которые особенно хочется примерить этой осенью и зимой 🍂
Здесь есть и спокойные — графитовый, шоколадный, глубокий синий.
И те, которые сразу добавляют настроения — бордовый, сливо…
Я, кажется, нашла тот самый способ сделать обычную стирку намного приятнее 😉
Уже какое-то время пользуюсь кондиционерами для белья Tesori d’Oriente и каждый раз ловлю себя на мысли, почему я раньше не уделяла столько внимания аромату вещей 🤔?
Это не просто «пахнет свежестью». Это именно парфюмерный аромат, который остаётся на ткани и создаёт ощущение, будто ты только что вышла из спа 🤩
А бельё после стирки становит…
Кто сказал, что спортивная одежда это только про спорт?
Я наконец-то обновила свои спортивные комплекты и теперь хочется тренироваться ещё больше!
Выбирала так, чтобы было удобно, красиво и чтобы самой нравилось отражение в зеркале.
Артикулы оставляю ниже 👇
Комбинезон длинный
https://wburl.ru/kseniya-11q3
Артикул :300365205
Размерный ряд : 38-48
Комбинезон на молнии
https://wburl.ru/kseniya-g3kh
Артикул :3003667…
Берём/ Не берём сумки этой осенью 👜🍷
Девочки, ну всё, давайте разбираться с сумками 😍
Я посмотрела, что сейчас предлагают бренды, и собрала для вас модели, на которые я бы действительно обратила внимание, и те, на которые сейчас точно не стала бы тратить деньги👇🏻
❤️ ЧТО БЕРЕМ:
👜 Мягкие, объемные сумки
Вот это сейчас прям ДА.
Мне нравится, когда сумка не стоит «колом», а мягко собирается в складки и выглядит нем…
❤49🔥25👍8💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @bolilayaksu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,113,337 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“БОЛИЛАЯ КСЮ” (@bolilayaksu), 39,381 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bolilayaksu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.