Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

болевой порог. ||рест

@bolevoi21

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

643subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002006622726
TypeChannel
Username@bolevoi21
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bolevoi21

Growth

643644643.510 Aug 2026, 08:31 — 644 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 08:45 — 644 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 04:28 — 643 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 08:3111 Aug 2026, 04:28
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 643–644 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 04:28643-1
10 Aug 2026, 08:45644no change
10 Aug 2026, 08:31644first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
66.1%
avg views ÷ 643 subscribers
Avg views / post
425
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held16 (4 July 202626 July 2026)
Views total2,552
Reactions total236
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

657 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 528294789163834236816224.7%
custom 545170772231770588813019.8%
custom 545160994309223968512318.7%
609.13%
custom 5391340221805644443558.37%
custom 5417848450718913727406.09%
274.11%
custom 5233431368301569987243.65%
custom 5339326638842730314121.83%
custom 5348506899509687457121.83%
🆒91.37%
💘20.304%
💋10.152%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 657reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
79
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 16 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bolevoi21. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC349 views56 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

к слову полноценка будет ноо я хз когда закончу и не уверен будет ли нфсв эээ

custom 54517077223177058883410custom 53485068995096874575custom 54516099430922396854custom 53393266388427303142custom 52334313683015699871

Signed кирюша стерва 🎱🧨

26 Jul 2026, 13:53 UTC339 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

столько тавтологий слова время сори

9custom 54516099430922396852custom 52334313683015699871

Signed кирюша стерва 🎱🧨

26 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC329 views43 reactionsread 10 August 2026

добрый день, как относитесь к тому, что я буду выкладывать работки в традише временами? времени на классные полноценки в дидже в последнее время почти нет мммьье 🐱

custom 539134022180564444316custom 53393266388427303149custom 52829478916383423687custom 54517077223177058885custom 545160994309223968532custom 52334313683015699871

Signed кирюша стерва 🎱🧨

17 Jul 2026, 19:47 UTC518 views28 reactionsread 10 August 2026

бля, я скоро начну правила вводить эмэм.....

16custom 54516099430922396855custom 54178484507189137274🆒2custom 54517077223177058881

Signed кирюша стерва 🎱🧨

17 Jul 2026, 19:46 UTC517 views30 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ах да, забыл сообщить, немного поменял там в чате возможность писать, ибо меня заебло что мне всякую хуету там рекламят окда

custom 545170772231770588815custom 54516099430922396856custom 54178484507189137275custom 53913402218056444433🆒1

Signed кирюша стерва 🎱🧨

17 Jul 2026, 19:44 UTC500 views67 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#art #фупокажи намёк на #NSFW хз пополнение. очень редко рисую лолей эмэммм

custom 52829478916383423683612custom 545170772231770588811custom 54516099430922396856💘1custom 53913402218056444431

Signed кирюша стерва 🎱🧨

11 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC600 views67 reactions10 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

пiздюк

custom 528294789163834236832custom 545160994309223968512custom 5451707722317705888124custom 53913402218056444433custom 52334313683015699872💘1custom 54178484507189137271

Signed кирюша стерва 🎱🧨

10 Jul 2026, 10:11 UTC605 views17 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

благодарю за звездочки, балуете 🥺

custom 528294789163834236810custom 54517077223177058883custom 54516099430922396852custom 52334313683015699871custom 53913402218056444431

Signed кирюша стерва 🎱🧨

10 Jul 2026, 10:08 UTC579 views35 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤 смешное фото, не забудь поделиться с родными : https://t.me/WhatTheFileBot?start=DGl-tCgAL2kIggA4ODGlgKABp6ASoS2xGDdpAR9hGNwzApVAJC3Qj8

custom 5417848450718913727196custom 54517077223177058884custom 52829478916383423682custom 53485068995096874572custom 52334313683015699871custom 53913402218056444431

Signed кирюша стерва 🎱🧨

10 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC555 views71 reactions51 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#art #фупокажи #NSFW (?) снова ферби ихехех. фулл будет, вы удивитесь. 🥺

custom 545170772231770588836custom 53913402218056444431411custom 52829478916383423684custom 53485068995096874573🆒1custom 53393266388427303141custom 54516099430922396851

Signed кирюша стерва 🎱🧨

9 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC447 views31 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ферби всем смотреть

custom 545160994309223968516custom 53913402218056444438custom 52334313683015699873custom 54517077223177058883💋1

Signed кирюша стерва 🎱🧨

9 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC442 views54 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

СМРОТРМТЕ ЧТО СМОТРИТЕ ЧТО. спасиьо @Kolien_SOP эта очень круто ьеьетьаа 🥺

custom 528294789163834236823custom 545160994309223968512custom 53913402218056444438custom 545170772231770588852custom 53485068995096874572custom 54178484507189137272

Signed кирюша стерва 🎱🧨

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @bolevoi21. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 563,945 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“болевой порог. ||рест” (@bolevoi21), 643 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bolevoi21.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.