Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Секта Юрия Ветрова

Channel

Секта Юрия Ветрова

@bogvaytg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,898subscribers

+110 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002439292677
TypeChannel
Username@bogvaytg
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bogvaytg

Growth

2,7882,8982,8437 August 2026 — 2,788 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,788 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,819 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,860 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,898 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 8 days, net +110. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,772–2,915 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 09:432,898+38
11 Aug 2026, 15:032,860+41
8 Aug 2026, 12:302,819+31
7 Aug 2026, 13:472,788no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:362,788first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
76.4%
avg views ÷ 2,898 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,220
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (22 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total39,876
Reactions total2,781
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,781 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 534606044748320811367624.3%
custom 528525366201105313848717.5%
custom 534588122279291216037413.4%
custom 540257802950542658734912.5%
custom 536414117746760886433111.9%
custom 59677250390872594732609.35%
custom 53437368229314316831766.33%
custom 53436141286006876431284.60%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,781reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 18 we hold a reading for · 39%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bogvaytg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC696 views115 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну идешь ты, видишь бабушка лежит Ну подойди, подними ее И на душе благодать И людского прибавилось

custom 534373682293143168351custom 528525366201105313822custom 534606044748320811321custom 53436141286006876437custom 59677250390872594736custom 54025780295054265875custom 53458812227929121603

6 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈2,070 views131 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Выставка «100 колобков юрия ветрова» будет идти 3 часа в Москве 21 августа скриньте

custom 528525366201105313881custom 534373682293143168326custom 536414117746760886420custom 59677250390872594734

4 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC≈1,470 views152 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Какую индустрию разъебать?

custom 534606044748320811380custom 534588122279291216034custom 536414117746760886415custom 59677250390872594737custom 52852536620110531386custom 53437368229314316835custom 54025780295054265875

4 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈1,530 views169 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Какого хуя происходит? Где он?

custom 540257802950542658779custom 534588122279291216036custom 596772503908725947325custom 534606044748320811314custom 53641411774676088648custom 52852536620110531387

3 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,840 views97 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Думайте

custom 534361412860068764349custom 540257802950542658722custom 536414117746760886414custom 53460604474832081137custom 52852536620110531385

31 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC≈2,290 views178 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Потихоньку все

custom 528525366201105313898custom 596772503908725947327custom 534606044748320811318custom 534361412860068764316custom 54025780295054265877custom 53437368229314316836custom 53458812227929121606

29 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTC≈2,870 views131 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Потихоньку вникаю в шоу бизнес Джонгарик это баста?

custom 534361412860068764351custom 536414117746760886429custom 534373682293143168324custom 534606044748320811316custom 52852536620110531387custom 54025780295054265874

29 Jul 2026, 17:18 UTC≈2,730 views162 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что думаете про голую вечеринку?

custom 528525366201105313872custom 534606044748320811338custom 534588122279291216022custom 540257802950542658717custom 59677250390872594738custom 53641411774676088645

28 Jul 2026, 09:08 UTC≈2,880 views145 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 534606044748320811375custom 540257802950542658730custom 536414117746760886415custom 596772503908725947313custom 52852536620110531387custom 53436141286006876435

27 Jul 2026, 19:08 UTC≈2,510 views154 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Триптих

custom 540257802950542658771custom 534606044748320811334custom 596772503908725947326custom 534588122279291216013custom 53641411774676088644custom 52852536620110531383custom 53437368229314316833

27 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC≈2,280 views164 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

Знаете в чем проблема современных Русских художников?

custom 536414117746760886486custom 534588122279291216035custom 534606044748320811322custom 540257802950542658717custom 53437368229314316834

26 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC≈2,630 views139 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Алексей Землянов «Девушка и солнце» 1925 Уральский авангард

custom 534588122279291216067custom 536414117746760886433custom 528525366201105313820custom 534606044748320811311custom 53437368229314316835custom 54025780295054265873

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bogvaytg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 73,001 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Секта Юрия Ветрова” (@bogvaytg), 2,898 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bogvaytg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.