2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 180–182 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 12:58
181
no change
11 Aug 2026, 10:18
181
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 16 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
160 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
45
28.1%
❤
36
22.5%
🔥
27
16.9%
💯
14
8.75%
custom 5472146462362048818
11
6.88%
😁
9
5.63%
🤯
5
3.13%
👏
4
2.50%
🤩
3
1.88%
😢
2
1.25%
🤝
2
1.25%
🥱
2
1.25%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2025 to 12 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bobnosponge. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 June 2025 to 12 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Elon Musk is playing packman
Today marks the biggest IPO in history. Shares of 3 (or 4 🤔) of Elon's companies after successfully merging into one SpaceX, it is gonna become publicly tradable. Might sound like a regular IPO but there is a twist - the valuation is over $1.75 trillion. To put it into perspective it's more than half of Germany's whole stock market. After the IPO Elon is supposed to officially become the…
🦷 My oral care routine
I bet you all are sick to your throat from content about AI (do not confuse with AI content). So to bring a bit of variety on this channel I'm sharing my current oral care routine in this post.
I'm a huge sweets enjoyer and you may guess the condition of my teeth. Almost all of them have fillings from cavitation treatment, some of them have cracked or broken.
A few years back I saw videos on…
Oopsies... somebody got offended by my last post. Anyways I'm not here to please Anthropic employees. I'm here to point out problems and call out companies about their questionable morals. If you don't want to initiate a constructive conversation you either in a bubble which you clearly don't want to pop or you don't care to elaborate or both.
Dario clearly states he wants us to lose our jobs and our salaries instea…
AI economy
I was surprised with the results of the poll I posted recently. Claude won on spot (I assume that's because many of you are developers who use Claude Code), although I expected ChatGPT to take the lead followed by Gemini. Probably Anthropic's never ending hype makes itself known. Well this is a great opportunity for me to break everything down for you.
Anthropic's CEO - Dario Amodei is on every interview…
Over 8 decades ago
May 9 is marked as a holiday in some or many countries. Russia calls it Victory day, Germany doesn't celebrate for obvious reasons and Uzbekistan calls this day a Remembrance day which is worth noting. Media in many post Soviet countries gonna be actively brainwashing viewers with clips where government officials gonna be visiting memorials or very few veterans left from WWII.
I am always disgust…
The shares total 167%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤑 Nvidia's monopoly
Nvidia is the biggest software company in the world. Did I hear you saying - "wait a minute, Nvidia is a hardware company, they produce chips"? Yeah, you are right, but read on carefully and I will tell you who they really are.
The lifecycle of a GPU or an AI chip starts from the design. Nvidia uses chip design software to build an architecture of a chip and when finalized they contact TSMC (chi…
🏛 Government budget, its deficit and debt explained
Ever wondered how a government operates? To answer this question we first need to identify who exactly a government is. It's different for every country but for most it's clear - those who establish laws, control different aspects of running the country e.g. security, finance, economy, energy, healthcare, etc. So basically the things that are important to keep ever…
🏋️♀️Warm-ups
When I used to go to the gym with my fellow colleagues I would usually directly start with my workout. One of my colleagues once asked why I don't do warm-ups. I said - "Because I'm a hot guy". That joke really clicked and everyone would occasionally mention it here and there 😃
Back then I thought warm-ups are insignificant. Well they're not. And it's more than just about working out. Put your mind an…
🔥4😁3👍1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @bobnosponge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 167%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2025 to 12 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 486,934 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bob Usmonov” (@bobnosponge), 181 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bobnosponge.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.