Channel
@bobbynetwork
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
1,851subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001347916571 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bobbynetwork |
| Created | 10 April 2021 β measured β cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bobbynetwork |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 1,851 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 1,852 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 1,853 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 1,853 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 12 May 2022 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
329 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 168 | 51.1% | |
| β€ | 65 | 19.8% | |
| π₯ | 37 | 11.2% | |
| π | 31 | 9.42% | |
| π | 28 | 8.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 329reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2022 to 11 June 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Proper Gamer-Lingo VS Social Engineering Re-Hashing: β Gamification is a low-tier Social SCIENCEβ’ β Controlled Op is attached to it β Swarm Intelligence originated in dull Gamification-noobs-circles β Gamification is used by noobs at laissez faire-shitholes like Esalen, combined with psychdedelics ("muuuh Ayahuasca muuuh") β World Economic Forum is a "muuuh sustainable" Goa Trance Hare Rama Hare Krishna Loser Boomerβ¦
π32π₯7β€2π2
the elephant in the room: Neither the Vaxxed, nor the Un-Vaxxed are dying in great numbers.
π46π16π5π₯3β€1
Lost in War-Bukkake Part 1 & 2 Part 1: The president of Poland - Andrzej Duda - is butthurt: Germany & Olaf Scholz broke the war-bukkake-promise: βGermany has promised to deliver these tanks to us [.] not fulfilled this promise" Die Welt Article: EN / GER Tweet-Archive Part 2: Zelenskyy is butthurt: Joe Biden is too senile for any kind of war-bukkake-games: "U.S. will not send Ukraine rocket systems that can β¦
π₯9π8β€5
Western Media on Ukraine before 2022, which turned then to SLAVA UKRAINI chanting Hi Res (ibb.co) (Still ongoing) Thread @bobbynetwork
π17
Meanwhile in Davos at the Hare Rama Hare Krishna World Economic Forum: George Soros DoomsDay Nightmare Mode activated "... slams Merkel for "special deals" on Russian Gas" "... civilization may not survive Putin's war in πΊπ¦" ... while being member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Or in other words: When uncle George Soros overdoses at the World Economic Forum on Zelenskyy-cocaine provided by the Council onβ¦
π11β€5π₯2
That's how the Monkeypoxalypse started [thx 2 Tobias Kowitt in my VIP group for pointing out]
β€20π6π6π1
Cute Fake Account When Jikky The Glowie Mouse aka Arkmedic does a threesome with Q-Tard " ΜΆDΜΆrΜΆ" Simon and his Trust The Plan Gang. "thebobby_network" has quite a fuzzy gain of trust creativity problem. The Real Deal: @bobbynetwork Connected 1 Connected 2 "Muuh Truth"
π12π₯4π3π2
https://twitter.com/Bobby_Network/status/1528320838516322304
At least π€‘π memes have had an upgrade π
β€26π12π₯5π3
Wanna laugh? I did not know that Bhakdi Jr was directly involved into the COVID-19 qPCR testing realm... maybe I had overseen it in the past. Though I noticed an odd connection to "personalized gene therapies". Consider this: What if it is on purpose that such odd Pharma Connections are re-surfacing right now - while Bhakdi is in German Headlines for some (actually) irrelevant / grotesque KenFM Circle Jerking Disβ¦
π20π₯5π2π1
Did someone say "Truth"? https://twitter.com/Bobby_Network/status/1524775870912729092
π7β€5
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @bobbynetwork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 657,251 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@bobbynetwork named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βBobby's Network γ πππβ οΈβ (@bobbynetwork), 1,851 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bobbynetwork.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.