9 measurements spanning 23 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,494–1,552 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 14:53
1,501
-5
27 Aug 2026, 10:24
1,506
-7
24 Aug 2026, 15:28
1,513
-9
20 Aug 2026, 14:52
1,522
-7
17 Aug 2026, 09:28
1,529
-9
13 Aug 2026, 13:17
1,538
-2
10 Aug 2026, 18:32
1,540
-5
7 Aug 2026, 12:02
1,545
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:54
1,545
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
153 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
61
39.9%
👨💻
33
21.6%
🌭
29
19.0%
🐳
24
15.7%
🗿
5
3.27%
custom 5283116494874485330
1
0.654%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2025 to 18 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
51
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bob_crypt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 November 2025 to 18 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😭 НОВОГОДНЯЯ ПРИКОРМКА
MEXC щедро одарил наше комьюнити 🦸♂️
каждый кто выполнит условия получит 30 USDT на свой акк мекса
- зарегайте аккаунт по моей ссылке (обязательно)
- пройдите KYC (только для СНГ пользователей)
- депозит от 101$ и держать нужно минимум 2 дня
- торговый обхем на фьючах – 500$
не надо абузить на одни и те же доки – за это ничего не раздадут
промка щедрая – покушать все смогут
кто еще не вдуплился что такое полик 😐
не буду сам долго рассказывать, а лучше скину открытое дао полимаркета в снг 💙
https://t.me/+eHYSsD9Hy00zYjM0
если вам реально интересно разобраться - заходите, вам там будут рады и помогут со всем
а те, кто реально будут чет делать смогу попасть в мейн дао, в котором сижу и я 👍
также чекайте мой твитак регулярно
https://x.com/ethb0b
пощу туда коллы и контент по полику к…
🍦 легкие 8% на сайз?
сейчас очень плотно слежу за одним событием на экране
https://polymarket.com/event/nothing-ever-happens-november?via=michael-nl9t
🔜 заканчивается сегодня в 19:59 по МСК
нам нужно чтобы ничего из этого не произошло:
- ядерная война
- война с Венесуэлой
- вывод РФ войск
будто бы риск фри бабки на большой сайз
NFA DYOR
🪙 солана к слову 140
среднее твх у меня наверное около 125 на сайз
пока хз закрепимся ли
но ребята верят в бычку и откупают проливы
сейчас полимркет планирует в сша выходить
+ лайтер тге скоро
+ только что мон вышел
🐂 начинается мини движуха
хотелось бы конечно в новом году приятный сюрприз в виде альтсезона увидеть
+ еще сейчас мажор по кс2 🦸♂️
по этому поводу некст пост будет поэтому ждите)
к слову зимой и н…
🌟 Зашел я от скуки в X
ну и вспомнил что аж в далеком 2023 я плотно его вел и даже набил 1к подписоты
вспомнил что хотел почекать что такое полик и решил влиться в это с головой
начал шариться по иксу и еба чего накопал
💙 Полик – единственная платформа рн где можно делать risk-free бабки
и я понял, что хочу посвятить этой истории свой твиттер
вот кстати и он {ТЫК}
уже публикую в него плотно все свои находки, мы…
пока делайте фокус на чем-то вне крипты
вне графиков и тем более солана тренчей
развивайте стейбл income
потом скажите спасибо на буллиш рынке
+ откупить сейчас просадку сможете
а сидеть графики чекать каждый день
и говорить ой как хуево все сможете и потом
🦸♂️ я не знаю в какой момент тон решит что хватит падать
но нельзя же сука столько говна в рынок подарков пускать
типы буквально штампуют любое говно и выпускают
а все хавают
но потом блять сливают сразу в минус
буквально папахи выпустили
уже в -30% торгуются
а хабиб вообще любые упоминания о партнерстве удалил
полный тормоз ребята
дальше меньше
пока началась какая-то движуха с укр россией
мы немножко вверх отскочили
думаю до нового года особо ничего интересного больше не будет
можем пойти снова вниз
я уже впринципе неплохо успел спота набрать
меня любой вариант устроит
лонги и шорты не брал
сейчас оч сильная неопределнность
большой страх у людей
но при этом любой даже самый мелкий отскок – щепоть веры на рост
так что нас может сейчас ебашить туда сюда …
продолжаю набирать солану
плотно летим вниз пока что
начал набирать со 130 по дса
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bob_crypt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,303,899 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“bob.crypto” (@bob_crypt), 1,501 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bob_crypt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.