Channel
@blossomsreview
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,687subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002305133647 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blossomsreview |
| Description | 若批评不自由，则赞美无意义。 请大家优先订阅主报告频道 @szfanhuabg 投稿入口 @fanhuaabot 主群 https://t.me/+dLLvB0qAb9AzZTQx 验证资源 @fanhuax |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blossomsreview |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 00:22 | 2,687 | no change |
| 6 Oct 2026, 00:22 | 2,687 | no change |
| 5 Oct 2026, 23:47 | 2,687 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 October 2026 – 5 October 2026) |
| Views total | 969 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 00:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#梅梅 @meimei4686 700 宝安 人照课表差异： 没看见 优点： 没发现 不足： 死中介，约好时间，结果到了一句肚子不舒服，让我在楼下等了半小时，他给我发的地方还是个居民房楼下，人员太杂了，不远处就是派出所，出来玩，本来就是做贼心虚，哪里敢一直等，半小时不上线，上线之后还删我聊天记录 补充： 评分： 1 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-10-05 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉黑。 » 繁花资源 » 交流群组 » 我也要写报告
#小甜甜 @xtt789000 800 龙岗 人照课表差异： 9以上，本人比照片更好看 优点： 颜色好、肤白、纯天然🐻又挺又大 不足： 配合的很好 补充： 国庆放假，必须找小甜甜。一段时间没见，心里一直惦记着，直接私信约了课。 按时到达，她遥控让我上楼。进门见到她，比之前丰满了一点点，但还是该大的地方大，身材十分诱人。身姿往那里一站就很有气场，大E🐻又大又挺，穿衣服都撑得满满的，视觉冲击直接拉满。简单聊了几句近况，完全没有生疏感，就去洗澡。 鸳鸯浴她还是那么仔细，从胸口到下面都认真清洗。过程中那对大🐻一直贴着我背上、胸口、手臂蹭来蹭去，又软又热又有弹性，比记忆中更沉、更有料。洗到后面我已经完全硬了，她还低头笑了一下，气氛直接起来。 洗完擦干，她换了套性感情趣内衣，大🐻几乎要溢出来，随着动作轻轻晃，特别养眼。先是🐍吻，吻得又深又久，舌头灵活地缠着，口水交换得厉害，直接吻到有点喘不过气，头晕脑胀的。接着她往下做口活，含得深，…
👍1
#小护士沫沫 @xuu52 1000 南山 人照课表差异： 人照一致 优点： 嫩妹，粉，紧 不足： 没有缺点 补充： 是邻家小妹，很嫩肤白 评分： 5 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-10-05 投稿人: 南山小护... #历史投稿8045787255 投稿数: 0 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉黑。 » 繁花资源 » 交流群组 » 我也要写报告
#薏儿 @yiyiss668 700 宝安 人照课表差异： 老师不会拍照，我觉得本人比照片好看自然，跟课表没有差异。 优点： 小个子1米58左右我这个大个子。抱着老师站着正好，老师服务非常好，每个细节都做的比较到位。自己喜欢的姿势也可以告诉老师。 不足： 没有不足，这是我玩到现在遇到比较好的了 补充： 老师骚话连篇。本来是做环保的，让我忍不住想干。老师毒🐉口技都非常爽 评分： 5 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-10-05 投稿人: 冲 冲冲 #历史投稿6463266400 投稿数: 0 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉黑。 » 繁花资源 » 交流群组 » 我也要写报告
#小小鱼 @suike778 800 龙岗 人照课表差异： 9 人照一致 优点： 肤白貌美 服务态度好 不足： 无毒🐲 补充： 很满意，人照合一，说话声也很温柔，服务中有舌吻口活，🐻有着C的罩杯，确实让人没想到，一双笔直的长腿，不机车，妹子很会夹，各种方式夹，好几个频率，差点给我夹射了，很紧，水又多，喜欢叫床声，听话只要不是过分的各种姿势都能得到配合。可以复刷，也是吃上了 评分： 5 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-10-04 投稿人: 浪子 #历史投稿8799599355 投稿数: 0 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉黑。 » 繁花资源 » 交流群组 » 我也要写报告
#小雨 @abc885858 800 宝安 人照课表差异： 9成以上 优点： 体验感拉满 不足： 没有，还有送精油SPA 补充： 找了小雨约的pp课，小雨是我喜欢的类型 ，记忆深刻的是给我口的时候，可以无齿感也可以快速吞吐，小👄的包裹性很强，我甚至觉得要比下面更爽，尤其是口的时候，老师拉丝的眼神，瞬间让我想起了，少年青涩时期刚处对象时候，懵懂的女朋友给我口的时候的感觉，反差感十足，又骚又纯的感觉。口了一会我也受不了，带上雨伞直接开冲，老师很自然的把屁股撅起来。她说她喜欢这个姿势，说这样插的深，她很爽，那就恭敬不如从命，过程中大概换了几个姿势最后一个姿势，说要女上，说那样可以把握自己的感觉让自己高潮，最后也是在老师微微颤抖下，顺利出货，后来休息时老师也是无话不说。没有什么风尘女子的模样，聊了很多，休息够了就开始了第二次。老师给我的感觉就像和女朋友第一次做爱一样，很刺激。最后也顺利出水。 评分： 5 投稿信息： 时间:…
#小羽 @yuer16688 1000 福田 人照课表差异： 线下本人比照片好看可爱 皮肤真白嫩 虽然刚下海 服务做的还是可以的 课表写的基本都有 主要听话好把玩 优点： m底 户型馒头 特别粉嫩 乳头也是小小粉 健谈好相处 小穴真紧 舔起来口感很棒 不足： 无 补充： 是个超级嫩妹 小女朋友视角 需要好好维护 不要桩坏了 各位友友 评分： 5 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-10-03 投稿人: 飞鱼 #历史投稿8655515339 投稿数: 0 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉黑。 » 繁花资源 » 交流群组 » 我也要写报告
👍1
#阿雅 @yaya2026999 800 南山 人照课表差异： 人照一致 优点： 时隔一个月来返食，老师依旧非常热情，进门就是一个大大的拥抱加蟒蛇吻，搞得我直接就想在沙发上办了。后来还是忍住先泡泡浴。服务质量一如既往地高。泡泡浴到一半还是忍不住了戴套开搞。一发之后休息一会洗澡。之后老师又做了很详细的服务，弟弟硬邦邦再来了一发。结束之后休息了一会顶不住老师的诱惑还想再来一次，但是实在是没力气了哈哈。歇了一会，意犹未尽。下次再来挑战三次 不足： 还是太瘦了，多吃点 补充： 课室干净，老师也很健谈 评分： 5 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-10-03 投稿人: 库奇 #历史投稿1737221239 投稿数: 1 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉黑。 » 繁花资源 » 交流群组 » 我也要写报告
#小甜甜 @xtt789000 800 龙岗 人照课表差异： 人照一致 优点： 时隔一个月来返食，老师依旧非常热情，进门就是一个大大的拥抱加蟒蛇吻，搞得我直接就想在沙发上办了。后来还是忍住先泡泡浴。服务质量一如既往地高。泡泡浴到一半还是忍不住了戴套开搞。一发之后休息一会洗澡。之后老师又做了很详细的服务，弟弟硬邦邦再来了一发。结束之后休息了一会顶不住老师的诱惑还想再来一次，但是实在是没力气了哈哈。歇了一会，意犹未尽。下次再来挑战三次 不足： 还是太瘦了，多吃点 补充： 课室干净，老师也很健谈 评分： 5 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-10-03 投稿人: 库奇 #历史投稿1737221239 投稿数: 1 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉黑。 » 繁花资源 » 交流群组 » 我也要写报告
#小暖 @xiaonuan_888 700 南山 人照课表差异： 人照9 课表都有 舌吻管饱 这个不错，舌教的福音 优点： 口活不错，小小只却可以口的很深，配合度高，情绪到位 不足： 胸不大 补充： 口技很棒，舌头灵活，手也不闲着。这个时候就已经快缴械了，于是赶快戴套发车。自备钢板001，老师还加了润滑。 ls屁股手感贼好，叫声很销魂，轮番试了几个体位最后顺利出货，下次再来，舌的很舒服 评分： 5 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-10-03 投稿人: 五竹 #历史投稿8269015147 投稿数: 1 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉黑。 » 繁花资源 » 交流群组 » 我也要写报告
#思雨 @siyuq1818 700 龙华 人照课表差异： 人照8.5，真人耐看 优点： 大胸翘臀，风骚，服务不错，情绪价值高 不足： 暂时没发现 补充： 一进门看到大胸和善笑容思雨老师迎接我，人照一眼能认出是本人，丰乳肥臀是我的菜。自觉先交水费，脱衣洗澡选了吊带黑丝，主动帮我擦干水，看着大奶子秒硬嘻嘻，蹲下擦完脚，洗个手回来抓起老弟无桃吹，上床舌🐍吻，舔奶，👅毒🐉一边舔一边骚话挑逗我，拍拍屁股立即调头来了个69，差点该忍住，马上戴套套开干，几个姿势过后冲刺出货。事后让我躺会再去冲洗，本次出击很不错，非常好，兄弟们喜欢丰乳肥臀服务及态度好点无脑冲，萝卜白菜，各有所爱 评分： 4.5 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-10-03 投稿人: 谷主 #历史投稿8736874266 投稿数: 2 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉黑。 » 繁花资源 » 交流群组 » 我也要写报告
#可文 @kewen888888 1500 宝安 人照课表差异： 九分，清纯可人，有女友感，温柔 优点： 性格温和，态度好，各种配合姿势 不足： 第二次去了，很满意 补充： 评分： 5 投稿信息： 时间: 2026-10-02 投稿人: zwong #历史投稿8468505186 投稿数: 0 提示：本频道已建立10万份报告库，检出抄袭即拉黑。 » 繁花资源 » 交流群组 » 我也要写报告
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blossomsreview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳繁花报告（备用）” (@blossomsreview), 2,687 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blossomsreview.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.