Channel
@bloqueados_por_Alvise_SALF
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,078subscribers
+98 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002579899504 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bloqueados_por_Alvise_SALF |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bloqueados_por_Alvise_SALF |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 1,078 | +11 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 1,067 | +4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 1,063 | +4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 1,059 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 1,058 | +8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 1,050 | +57 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 993 | +7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 986 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:21 | 980 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 980 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
223 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 96 | 43.0% | |
| 🤣 | 65 | 29.1% | |
| ❤ | 22 | 9.87% | |
| 👌 | 16 | 7.17% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 3.14% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 1.79% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.35% | |
| 👻 | 3 | 1.35% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.897% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 0.897% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.448% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.448% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.448% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 223 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴 Una vez más, el texto de Alvise no se corresponde con el documento que publica. Alvise: La Audiencia Nacional, debido a la denuncia presentada por SALF, solicita la Guardia Civil aclarar si recibió alguna alerta en los días previos a la entrada masiva de inmigrantes en Ceuta y reclama un informe completo sobre el operativo desplegado. El auto: INCÓENSE DILIGENCIAS PREVIAS, dando cuenta de su incoación al Minist…
👍17❤1
https://tgstat.com/channel/@Alviseperez/stat/subscribers 🔴 Ayer no fue precisamente un gran día para la Ardillita: más de 1.400 ardillas, hartas de comprar sus bellotas caducadas, decidieron dejar de financiar su particular casita del árbol. 😓 ✴️ Entérate de lo que Alvise esconde aquí 👇 https://t.me/bloqueados_por_Alvise_SALF
🤣13👍4
🔴 Si la Ardillita viera estas fotos, le quedaría súper claro quién es quién. ¡Lástima que no nos siga! 🤣 🇺🇸 Embajador de EEUU en Israel https://il.usembassy.gov/ambassador-mike-huckabee/ 🇮🇱 Embajador de Israel en EEUU https://embassies.gov.il/usa/en/the-embassy/the-ambassador ✴️ Entérate de lo que Alvise esconde aquí 👇 https://t.me/bloqueados_por_Alvise_SALF
👍10🤣4😁2
🔴 En el vídeo que acompaña la publicación anterior, Alvise encadena una intervención del embajador Mike Huckabee con la suya. Esto puede dar la impresión de que se trató de una respuesta directa, pero no es así. En el programa completo puede comprobarse que sus intervenciones se produjeron en momentos distintos. Piers Morgan despidió primero al embajador de EEUU en Israel y, posteriormente, presentó a Alvise Pérez y…
🤣7👌3👻3❤1
🔴 La Ardillita afirma textualmente: "ALVISE PÉREZ RESPONDE AL EMBAJADOR DE ISRAEL EN EEUU - PIERS MORGAN SHOW..." Pero la realidad es bastante menos épica: 1️⃣ En ese programa, Alvise y el periodista Miguel Mora respondieron a preguntas de Piers Morgan y expusieron su punto de vista sobre la invasión de Ceuta. 2️⃣ Mike Huckabee había intervenido previamente, pero no coincidió con Alvise en directo: Piers Morgan de…
🤣18👌2
🔴 Parece que la Ardillita ha vuelto a sacar el kit de Photoshop para crear un titular que no he conseguido localizar en ningún medio de comunicación. Si un juez español hubiera aceptado una querella y hubiera "ordenado diligencias urgentes" por primera vez contra Mohamed VI por delitos de lesa humanidad, la noticia estaría hoy en las portadas de medio mundo, no solo en su canal de Telegram. ✴️ Entérate de lo que Al…
👍18😁4🤣2🤡1
🔴 La Ardillita tiene una forma muy particular de contar las cosas para parecer la protagonista de todo, pero la realidad es muy diferente. Versión de Alvise: La Audiencia Nacional abre diligencias por el asalto masivo a Ceuta 72 horas después de las denuncias de Se Acabó La Fiesta. Titular de El Español: La jueza María Tardón abre diligencias para investigar delitos contra la seguridad del Estado y la Nación en C…
👍20❤3
https://x.com/i/status/2083780023614320872 🔴 Daniel Esteve, de Desokupa, parece que ya no es amigo de la Ardillita. Ahora apoya a Roberto Vaquero. Daniel Esteve: "Si viene, ya sabe lo que se va a encontrar... La concentración oficial es la vuestra y allí estaré con mi comunidad apoyando." "Roma no paga traidores..." 📌 Todo apunta a que las piezas se están recolocando en el tablero. ✴️ Entérate de lo que Alvise e…
❤14👍4👎2🤪2💩1🖕1😁1
El murciano comenta, sobre Alpiste, y otros influencers en Ceuta... https://www.youtube.com/live/57wA2T7mt2M?is=sWkSXeytioRTQ_Uz ✴️ Entérate de lo que Alvise esconde aquí 👇 https://t.me/bloqueados_por_Alvise_SALF
👍16❤3👏3👌2
🔴 Roberto Vaquero: «Alvise, al más puro estilo CNI, después de esconderse en un restaurante en Ceuta y desmovilizar, después de liársela a los agricultores y desmovilizar, después de lo que hizo en Ferraz y desmovilizar, vuelve a actuar como un agente del PSOE...» 🌹🐿️🌹 🤣🤣🤣 ✴️ Entérate de lo que Alvise esconde aquí 👇 https://t.me/bloqueados_por_Alvise_SALF
🤣21👍7👎1🤮1
🔴 Estos carteles muestran que tanto Roberto Vaquero como Daniel Esteve han convocado a los asistentes a la concentración autorizada para las 20:30 h., frente a la Embajada de Marruecos en Madrid. Mientras tanto, Alvise ha citado a sus seguidores una hora antes, en un punto cercano, para desplazarse posteriormente a esa misma concentración. De ahí que Roberto Vaquero sostenga que esa convocatoria paralela puede perj…
👌9👎1🤮1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @bloqueados_por_Alvise_SALF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bloqueados por Alvise SALF🇪🇸” (@bloqueados_por_Alvise_SALF), 1,078 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bloqueados_por_Alvise_SALF.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.