Channel
@blonde_bryansk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
70subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001426949377 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blonde_bryansk |
| Description | К красивым или к умным? Для блонинки этого вопроса не существует. ) |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 17 March 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blonde_bryansk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 70 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 70 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 17 March 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 January 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Дядя Вадим, вы теперь наш депутат. Дайте ачивку бабушке Маше. Пайкин платил,она хотябы края чуствовала. Без лавешек у нее пукан рвет. Она хастлит деца, но без денег ее телега и ее городской стали факовыми. В Брянске плохие дороги? Рили? Депутат Деньгин! Купите крезанутую жиробаску! https://t.me/bryansk_today20/274
Вадим Деньгин! ❤️ ЛДПР - лучшая!
Это зашквар! Тётенька палится! https://t.me/marliter/7
Фитнес топчик. Борис Романович мой краш! ❤️❤️❤️ https://t.me/ldpr_party/903
Тётки с центрального рынка приехали на нормальных тачках к налоговой и требуют мрот. С ними какойто мужик. Ну дал бы им мрот ,раз просят.
Женя Зорин не красавчик а конч. Сначала он мутил с депутаткой Валей "Сиськи" Нечаевой ,экология все дела а потом настучал за то что она купила квартиру в подмосковье. Это не преступление.Если бы у него были бабки, он бы тоже купил бы. Каждый купил бы.
Это варик разогнать этих хикканов. Идея топчик. https://lenta.ru/news/2020/05/19/senator/
Жесть! Нужно перекрыть дорогу из Смоленска! https://smoldaily.ru/902-zarazhyonnyh-v-smolenskoj-oblasti-zafiksirovali-rekordnoe-kolichestvo-inficzirovannyh-covid-19
Как отличник у доски ,все знает но волнуется. https://t.me/koronavirus32/682
Тянки из ЛДПР кинули линк на крутой видос, жирдяй, Маслов, Малюта, Каломейцев и какая то бабка говнят всех. Я чекнула ,видоса нет. Канал АКМ присел на очко и не сохранил трансляцию.
Video, posted without a caption
Тётка продолжает самоизоляцию. Норм. Ей можно.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @blonde_bryansk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@blonde_bryansk named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Брянская блондинка” (@blonde_bryansk), 70 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blonde_bryansk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.